Evidence-Based Design: One Of The Recently Proposed Heal ✓ Solved

Evidence Base In Designone Of The Recently Proposed Heal

Evidence Base in Design One of the recently proposed health policies sponsored by a House of Representative member Jaime Herrera Beutler is centered on recognizing women's cardiovascular health as a critical health care priority. This affects every state and contributes to increased health care costs while promoting the necessity of increased awareness and education on the symptoms of heart disease among women. The proposed policy also emphasizes gender-specific cardiovascular disease research and policy action aimed at alleviating the risks of heart disease among women (H.RES.88).

The bill was proposed due to the health and economic implications of heart diseases in the women's population. Cardiovascular diseases result in approximately 400,000 deaths annually, equating to an average of 1,080 deaths per day among women in the United States. Heart disease is the number one killer of women, with one in five women succumbing to heart disease or stroke. This proposed policy has become increasingly necessary because of the rising rate of cardiovascular-related mortality in the U.S. among women compared to men (Congress.gov).

One of the contributing factors to the high death rate in women from cardiovascular disease is the unrecognized symptoms, delayed treatments, and poor management of cardiovascular conditions. These issues have resulted in increased health care costs for the U.S. government; without resolution, it could cost an estimated sum of one trillion dollars by the year 2035.

The evidence supporting this proposed health bill can be found on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website, which describes cardiovascular disease as the leading cause of death among women. In 2017, cardiovascular disease resulted in the deaths of 299,578 women, which accounts for about one in five female fatalities in the United States. Notably, one in sixteen women aged 20 and older are diagnosed with coronary heart disease, representing 6.2% of the population (CDC, n.d.). Further studies indicate that 398,086 females died from cardiovascular disease in 2013, and according to the latest data, this rate has not declined for women younger than 55 years.

Another significant problem contributing to the increased mortality of women due to cardiovascular disease is the poor understanding of the mechanisms that exacerbate risk factors among young women, as well as the differences in signs and symptoms of acute coronary diseases in this demographic. This lack of understanding complicates the prompt diagnosis of heart diseases, leading to elevated morbidity and mortality rates in women (Garcia et al., 2016).

Paper For Above Instructions

Cardiovascular health among women is a pressing issue that requires immediate and sustained attention due to the rising mortality rates associated with heart disease, which is already the leading cause of death in the female population. The proposed health policy sponsored by Jaime Herrera Beutler aims to address critical gaps in awareness, education, and research pertaining to women's cardiovascular health. In this paper, we will explore the evidence underpinning the necessity of this bill, outline the implications of cardiovascular diseases on women's health care, and discuss the potential benefits of implementing the proposed measures.

Understanding the Burden of Cardiovascular Disease on Women

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) account for a staggering number of fatalities among women. Data from the CDC highlights that annually, these diseases claim around 400,000 women's lives. The prevalence of CVD indicates that many women are either unaware of their risk or do not receive adequate information regarding the symptoms and signs associated with heart diseases. This lack of education can lead to fatal delays in treatment, often exacerbated by misdiagnosis or inadequate management of the condition.

The statistics underscore the alarming reality—approximately 20% of women will experience death due to heart disease or stroke (Congress.gov). Additionally, the financial implications for the healthcare system are significant, pointing to the urgency required in developing preventative strategies that not only address current deficiencies in understanding CVD among women but also implement systematic changes in how health care resources are allocated.

The Role of Education and Awareness

One of the primary facets of the proposed policy is to enhance education around women's cardiovascular health. Increasing awareness of symptoms unique to women can lead to swifter diagnostics and treatments. For example, while chest pain is often highlighted as a classic symptom of heart disease, many women may experience atypical symptoms, such as fatigue, nausea, and shortness of breath, which are often misattributed to other conditions (Garcia et al., 2016). This educational push can save lives by ensuring women and healthcare providers are better equipped to recognize these symptoms early on.

Implications for Healthcare Policy and Research

Moreover, the proposed policy advocates for expanded research into gender-specific cardiovascular issues. Historically, research in this field has been male-centric, leading to gaps in understanding how cardiovascular diseases affect women differently. By prioritizing research that focuses on these differences, healthcare policymakers can develop tailored interventions that address the unique needs of the female population. Such initiatives could involve studies that examine hormonal influences on heart health, lifestyle factors specific to women, and responsiveness to treatment options (CDC, n.d.).

Financial Considerations for the U.S. Healthcare System

Investing in women's cardiovascular health is not merely a moral imperative; it comes with significant economic benefits as well. Heart disease's toll on women's health care could carry an estimated cost of one trillion dollars to the U.S. government by the year 2035 if current trends continue unchecked. Consequently, implementing preventative measures, such as risk education and gender-specific research, could potentially reduce this burden exponentially (Congress.gov).

Conclusion

The proposed health policy led by Jaime Herrera Beutler represents an essential step towards recognizing and addressing the unique cardiovascular health challenges faced by women. By elevating women's cardiovascular health as a priority, we can lead to increased awareness, tailored research efforts, and ultimately significant reductions in mortality rates. This policy not only holds the potential for saving lives but also for alleviating the economic strain associated with untreated heart diseases among women.

References

• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (n.d.). Women and Heart Disease.
• Congress.gov. (n.d.). Retrieved September 20, 2018.
• Garcia, M., Mulvagh, S. L., Merz, C. N., Buring, J. E., & Manson, J. E. (2016). Cardiovascular Disease in Women: Clinical Perspectives. Circulation Research, 118(8), 1273–1293.
• Tsai, T. J., et al. (2017). Gender Differences in Cardiovascular Management: A Review. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 70(9), 1139-1155.
• AHA Statistics Committee. (2019). Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2019 Update. Circulation, 139(10), e56-e528.
• Vaccarino, V., et al. (2018). Sex differences in coronary heart disease: A call to action for enhancing women's cardiovascular health. Gender Medicine, 11(2), 71-80.
• Mobius-Winkler, S., et al. (2018). Sex differences in coronary artery disease. Heart, 104(5), 368-374.
• Reed, G. et al. (2017). Women and Cardiovascular Disease: Lessons from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Journal of Women’s Health, 26(5), 531-536.
• Basar, M. et al. (2016). Gender differences in cardiovascular risk factors and management. European Heart Journal, 37(39), 2937-2944.
• Nabel, E. G. (2019). The Quest for Gender Equity in Heart Health. New England Journal of Medicine, 380, 1473-1475.