Examination Of A Political Leader Through Adlerian Theory

Examination of a Political Leader through Adlerian Theory of Superiority Striving and Style of Life

Understanding the motivations and personality development of political leaders through psychological frameworks can provide valuable insights into their behaviors and decisions. Among various theories, Alfred Adler’s approach offers a unique perspective by emphasizing the significance of childhood experiences, feelings of inferiority, superiority striving, style of life, and birth order. This paper applies Adlerian theory to analyze the leadership of Nelson Mandela, a prominent social and political figure renowned for his resilience, dedication to social justice, and transformative leadership in South Africa.

Superiority Striving and Motivation

Adler believed that feelings of inferiority in childhood could motivate individuals to strive for superiority, not merely for power but for personal achievement and significance. Nelson Mandela’s early life was marked by significant hardships, such as the death of his father and subsequent struggles within his family and community. Mandela’s childhood experiences of social marginalization and discrimination in apartheid-era South Africa likely contributed to his feelings of inferiority concerning racial inequality. According to Adler (1927), such feelings can be catalysts for striving toward significance and societal improvement.

Mandela’s choice to pursue law and dedicate his life to fighting apartheid reflects the Adlerian concept of superiority striving rooted in a desire to overcome perceived inferiority and injustice. His resilience in prison and relentless pursuit of racial equality demonstrate a high level of superiority striving aimed more at social change and justice rather than personal power. Mandela’s motivation was thus deeply connected to an internal drive to compensate for the oppressive social environment and his personal feelings of helplessness and marginalization, aligning with Adler’s notion that inferiority feelings can motivate constructive striving.

Style of Life and Long-Term Outcomes

Mandela’s style of life centered on social interest—prioritizing community well-being over personal gain. His goal was to dismantle systemic racial discrimination and establish a democratic South Africa. His actions included initiating dialogue with oppressors, advocating for reconciliation, and promoting national unity. Mandela’s style of life manifested in perseverance, forgiveness, and humanitarian values, which contributed to building bridges rather than burning them.

The long-term outcome of Mandela’s striving was the peaceful transition of power and the end of apartheid, with South Africa moving toward racial reconciliation and democratic stability. His leadership thus exemplified Adler’s concept of a healthy style of life—focused on societal interests rather than selfish pursuits. Mandela’s emphasis on social justice and equality reflects his intrinsic motivation to serve the collective good, consistent with Adler’s assertion that genuine superiority striving involves social interest and community welfare.

Application of Adler’s Birth Order Theory

Regarding birth order, Nelson Mandela was the first in his family lineage, which Adler theorized could influence one’s personality development. As the first-born son, Mandela might have experienced a sense of responsibility and a need to serve as an example for others. Adler suggested that first-borns often develop leadership qualities and a desire to leave a legacy, which aligns with Mandela’s authoritative yet caring style of leadership. His early position may have fostered a sense of duty and ambition to rectify social wrongs, reinforcing his long-term commitment to justice and social change.

Furthermore, Mandela’s upbringing in a traditional setting and his role as the eldest would have reinforced core Adlerian themes of social interest, responsibility, and a desire to improve society—traits evident throughout his leadership journey. This supports the idea that his personality was shaped by his birth order in conjunction with childhood experiences of adversity and responsibility.

Conclusion

Applying Adlerian theory to Nelson Mandela reveals that his motivation was driven by a desire to overcome social inferiority and contribute positively to society. His superior striving was rooted in social interest and a commitment to justice, reflected in his style of life that prioritized reconciliation and communal progress. The influence of his birth order further supported his leadership qualities and sense of responsibility. Mandela’s life exemplifies how childhood experiences, feelings of inferiority, and birth order can inform personality development and leadership styles within Adler’s framework.

References

• Adler, A. (1927). The practice and theory of individual psychology. Harcourt, Brace & World.
• Corey, G. (2017). Theory and practice of counseling and psychotherapy (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Feist, J., & Feist, G. J. (2018). Theories of personality (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• McLeod, S. (2018). Alfred Adler's individual psychology. Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/alfred-adler.html
• Nelson Mandela Foundation. (1994). Long walk to freedom: The autobiography of Nelson Mandela. Little, Brown and Company.
• Sternberg, R. J., & Kaufman, S. B. (2018). The // and psychology of leadership. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Leadership: Perspectives for a new era (pp. 45–66). Cambridge University Press.
• Watts, R. E., & Watts, J. D. (2011). Adlerian counseling: A practitioner’s approach. Wadsworth Publishing.
• Yalom, I. D. (1980). Existential psychotherapy. Basic Books.
• Yin, R. (2017). The case study anthology. Sage Publications.
• Zollicoffer, J., & Bussey, D. (2017). Leadership and social psychology: Tradition and innovation. Psychology Press.