Examine Ethics In Your New Career As A Criminal Justice Prof

Examine Ethics In Your New Career As A Criminal Justice Professional

Examine Ethics In Your New Career As A Criminal Justice Professional

Examine ethics in your new career as a criminal justice professional. You have just started out as a criminal justice professional. You have a partner who has spent 15 years in this profession. One day while you are out with your partner, you see that he is talking to a member of the local mob. Your partner accepts a large yellow envelope and tucks it quickly into his pocket.

You know that the man has a criminal record and has a history of extorting money out of the local businesses, but has never been charged with it due to lack of evidence. You ask your partner about the mobster and he tells you not to worry about it. You wonder if you should report the incident to the chief or not. Discuss the virtues that affected your judgment. Why is it important to have virtues?

Define virtue and list five examples of good virtues. How do these virtues develop? Can training play a role in developing these virtues? Discuss the importance of ethics. What choices did you have while making the decision of telling the chief about the incident with your partner?

Was the choice that you exercised based on an internalized or externalized behavior and value? Which virtues supported not reporting your partner? You continue to question your partner about the "envelope." Your partner finally responds and says it has been a long established tradition for local bookies to donate to the Police Athletic League and in return the cops look the other way when it comes to minor things like betting on sports. How would you react if guided by: Ethical formalism, Egoism, Utilitarianism, Ethics of care? Which choice would you personally make, and why?

Paper For Above instruction

Making ethical decisions in the criminal justice field is inherently complex, especially when faced with situations involving potential corruption or unethical behaviors by colleagues. The scenario presented here necessitates an examination of virtues, ethical principles, and personal values that shape decision-making. As a new criminal justice professional, understanding the role of virtues and ethical frameworks is essential, not only for personal integrity but also for maintaining public trust and upholding the law.

Understanding Virtues and Their Impact on Ethical Judgment

Virtues are character traits that exemplify moral excellence and guide individuals toward ethical behavior. They serve as foundational qualities that influence decision-making and moral conduct. Virtues such as honesty, integrity, courage, justice, and responsibility are particularly salient in the criminal justice profession. These traits foster trustworthiness, accountability, and moral strength, especially in challenging situations like witnessing unethical conduct among colleagues.

For a new professional encountering a colleague accepting an envelope from a known mobster, virtues like integrity would be pivotal. Integrity involves consistency between one's actions and moral principles. Demonstrating moral courage by confronting or reporting the misconduct reflects integrity. Conversely, virtues like loyalty may support hesitation in reporting, especially if the colleague is regarded as a long-time partner or friend.

Development of virtues occurs through personal reflection, education, mentorship, and experiential learning. Formal training in ethics can significantly enhance the development of virtues by clarifying moral standards and fostering deliberate practice of virtuous conduct. For example, ethics courses and role-playing scenarios can cultivate virtues like honesty and responsibility, essential for law enforcement officers.

The Importance of Ethics and Decision-Making Dynamics

Ethics provide a systematic framework for making morally sound decisions. They help individuals resolve dilemmas where competing values or principles are involved. In this scenario, ethical considerations include loyalty, truthfulness, justice, and the duty to uphold the law. The decision to report or not report reflects internal conflicts between personal values and professional responsibilities.

Choosing to report the incident might stem from internalized values—deeply held beliefs about justice and honesty—or from externalized behaviors learned through socialization and institutional norms. The virtues that support reporting include integrity and justice, emphasizing the importance of acting in accordance with moral principles rather than external pressures or convenience.

On the other hand, supporting non-reporting are virtues like loyalty or discretion, which might be rooted in external influences such as organizational culture or informal traditions. The "envelope" exchange and the perceived tradition of police turning a blind eye in exchange for community support highlight the influence of externalized values, rooted in social and institutional environments.

Analysis of the Ethical Dilemmas: Formalism, Egoism, Utilitarianism, and Care Ethics

Faced with the dilemma of whether to report the corrupt behavior, different ethical theories offer varying guidance. Ethical formalism emphasizes adherence to moral rules or duties, such as the duty to uphold justice and honesty. From this perspective, the morally correct action would be to report the colleague’s misconduct, regardless of personal relationships or outcomes.

Egoism, which prioritizes self-interest, might lead the individual to avoid reporting if they fear personal backlash or damage to their career. Conversely, utilitarianism considers the overall consequences, suggesting the action that maximizes well-being and minimizes harm. Reporting the misconduct might prevent future criminal activity, benefiting society, but could also cause personal or professional repercussions.

Ethics of care emphasizes relationships and compassion, advocating for considering the emotional bonds and responsibilities involved. This perspective might encourage a focus on loyalty or concern for colleagues, but also on the broader impact on the community and victims of corruption. Ultimately, this approach advocates balancing justice with compassion.

Personal Reflection and Ethical Choice

Personally, I would align with utilitarian principles, prioritizing actions that promote the greatest good for the greatest number. Reporting the misconduct, despite personal discomfort, would serve to uphold justice and protect the community from ongoing criminal influence. However, I recognize the importance of safeguarding personal integrity and the need for institutional support when making such decisions.

Decisions involving loyalty and tradition pose complex challenges. While loyalty to colleagues can impede ethical action, professional standards demand accountability and transparency. Acknowledging the influence of externalized values emphasizes the importance of cultivating virtues like honesty and justice to navigate such dilemmas effectively.

In conclusion, cultivating virtues, understanding ethical frameworks, and reflecting on personal values are vital for ethical decision-making in criminal justice. Upholding integrity, justice, and responsibility ensures that professionals serve the community ethically and responsibly, even amid challenging situations involving colleagues' misconduct or cultural pressures.

References

  • Alder, C. A. (2020). Foundations of Ethical Practice in Criminal Justice. Routledge.
  • Brennan, T. (2015). Ethical dilemmas in law enforcement: a comprehensive overview. Journal of Criminal Justice Ethics, 34(2), 109-124.
  • Hartley, M. (2017). The role of virtues in criminal justice ethics. Ethics & Behavior, 27(5), 389-404.
  • Kant, I. (1785). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals.
  • Pollock, J. M., & Cruz, M. (2018). Ethical dilemmas in criminal justice and how to handle them. Routledge.
  • Rest, J. R. (1984). Morality and character. In Morality, Moral Behavior, and Moral Development (pp. 61-81). Morgan Kaufmann.
  • Ryan, M. (2019). Building virtues in law enforcement. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 34(3), 237-245.
  • Walker, S. (2014). Cost of Justice: Ethical Challenges in Law Enforcement. Sage Publications.
  • Williams, B. (2008). Ethics and integrity in criminal justice. Critical Criminology, 16(4), 301-316.
  • Young, R. (2016). Community trust and the ethics of policing. Public Integrity, 18(4), 324-334.