Exercise Content In Ophthalmology Practice Is Deciding Wheth

Exercise Contentan Ophthalmology Practice Is Deciding Whether To Offer

An ophthalmology practice is considering whether to offer prescription eyeglasses for sale directly within the practice. The new service would involve additional training and hiring of staff, inventory costs for glasses and frames, and minor modifications to the existing space, with a portion of the office space costs being allocated to this program. The costs associated with this new service include variable costs of $80 per pair of eyeglasses (covering electricity, labor, and supplies) and total fixed costs of $36,000.

The practice is evaluating the break-even point for selling glasses at two different price points: $100 and $200 per pair. The key questions are: How many pairs must they sell to break even at each price? Additionally, considering the total community market for eyeglasses is 2,400 pairs, what market share percentage does the practice need to capture to break even at each price point?

The break-even calculation uses the formula: Break-even point = Fixed costs / (Price – Variable cost).

Paper For Above instruction

The decision for an ophthalmology practice to venture into selling prescription eyeglasses involves a comprehensive analysis of costs, market potential, and pricing strategies. The core financial concern is determining the volume of sales required to cover both fixed and variable costs—known as the break-even point—and assessing what share of the local market this entails at different price points. This analysis provides the foundation for making an informed decision about the viability and profitability of offering this new service.

Break-even Analysis at Different Price Points

Understanding the break-even point is crucial, as it indicates the minimum sales volume necessary to prevent losses. The formula, as given, is: Break-even volume = Fixed costs / (Price – Variable cost). Using the specific numbers provided, we can calculate the required sales volumes at both price points.

At a price of $100 per eyeglass:

  • Fixed costs = $36,000
  • Variable cost per unit = $80
  • Price per unit = $100

Substituting into the formula:

Break-even volume = $36,000 / ($100 - $80) = $36,000 / $20 = 1,800 pairs

Thus, the practice needs to sell at least 1,800 pairs at $100 each to break even.

At a price of $200 per eyeglass:

  • Fixed costs = $36,000
  • Variable cost per unit = $80
  • Price per unit = $200
Break-even volume = $36,000 / ($200 - $80) = $36,000 / $120 = 300 pairs

At this higher price point, only 300 pairs need to be sold to reach the break-even point.

Market Share Analysis for Breakeven

To understand whether these sales volumes are feasible within the community, the practice must consider the total market for eyeglasses, which is 2,400 pairs.

Market share percentage required to break even at each price point can be calculated as follows:

At a $100 price:

Market share = (Break-even volume / Total market) × 100 = (1,800 / 2,400) × 100 = 75%

This means the practice must capture at least 75% of the local eyeglasses market at the $100 price point to break even.

At a $200 price:

Market share = (300 / 2,400) × 100 ≈ 12.5%

So, only approximately 12.5% of the community's market share at the $200 price point is necessary to reach the break-even threshold.

Implications and Considerations

The analysis suggests that pricing significantly impacts the potential market share needed to be profitable. Selling at a higher price reduces the volume needed and makes a smaller market share sufficient, which might be advantageous if the practice can position itself as a premium provider or if the community’s demand at higher prices is strong. Conversely, pricing at $100 would require capturing a vast majority of the local market, which could be unrealistic or induce competitive pressures. The practice should consider local demand elasticity, consumer preferences, and competitive landscape when making its final decision.

Additionally, other factors such as marketing strategies, customer service, and the convenience offered by in-house sales could influence actual sales volume and market share capture. The operation's success depends on effectively reaching and convincing community members to purchase glasses from this new in-house service.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the practice needs to sell at least 1,800 pairs at $100 each or 300 pairs at $200 each to break even. Correspondingly, they must target a market share of 75% at the lower price point or approximately 12.5% at the higher price. These calculations provide clear benchmarks for assessing the feasibility of the new service based on pricing strategy and market penetration potentials. Real-world application would also require considering demand elasticity, competitive dynamics, and operational capacity to meet these sales targets.

References

  • Blocher, E., Stout, D., Juras, P., & Cokins, G. (2019). Cost Management: A Strategic Emphasis. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Drury, C. (2018). Management and Cost Accounting. Cengage Learning.
  • Horngren, C. T., Datar, S. M., & Rajan, M. (2015). Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis. Pearson Education.
  • Kaplan, R. S., & Atkinson, A. A. (2018). Advanced Management Accounting. Pearson.
  • Miller, T. W., & Vollmann, T. E. (2017). Manufacturing Planning and Control for Electronics. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Noreen, E., Brewer, P., & Garrison, R. (2017). Managerial Accounting. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Shim, J. K., & Siegel, J. G. (2019). Budgeting and Financial Management for Nonprofit Organizations. Wiley.
  • Weygandt, J. J., Kimmel, P. D., & Kieso, D. E. (2018). Managerial Accounting. Wiley.
  • Whitecotton, D., & Suttles, D. (2017). Managerial Cost Accounting. Cengage Learning.
  • Hilton, R. W., & Platt, D. (2017). Managerial Accounting: Creating Value in a Dynamic Business Environment. McGraw-Hill Education.

Related Assignments