Explain Manifest Destiny And American Exceptionalism

Explain Manifest Destiny and American exceptionalism . How were these ideas applied to U.S. foreign policy at the turn of the 20th century?

Manifest Destiny and American exceptionalism are foundational concepts that significantly influenced U.S. foreign policy at the turn of the 20th century. Manifest Destiny, a 19th-century belief that Americans were destined to expand across the North American continent, justified westward territorial expansion and influenced the nation's approach to asserting its influence beyond its borders. This ideology emphasized the perceived right and duty of Americans to spread their values and institutions, which later extended to overseas territories as part of broader imperial ambitions. American exceptionalism, on the other hand, is the notion that the United States holds a unique role as a nation predestined to promote democracy, liberty, and moral superiority on the global stage. This belief fostered the idea that the U.S. had a special obligation to lead and shape world affairs in accordance with its ideals.

During the late 19th and early 20th centuries, these ideas translated into an assertive foreign policy exemplified by actions such as the annexation of Hawaii, the Spanish-American War, and the establishment of overseas colonies like Puerto Rico and the Philippines. The annexation of Hawaii, motivated by strategic and economic interests, exemplified manifest destiny’s extension into the Pacific. The Spanish-American War, driven by motives to secure markets and military advantages, marked a pivotal moment where American exceptionalism justified intervention abroad, framing it as a moral crusade to free Cuba and uplift "less civilized" nations. Theodore Roosevelt’s presidency epitomized this imperial mindset, advocating a robust navy to project power globally and pursuing a policy of "speak softly and carry a big stick"—a clear embodiment of the expansionist and exceptionalist ideals that shaped U.S. foreign engagements.

What do you see as the positives and negatives of American Imperialism?

American imperialism at the turn of the 20th century had both positive and negative consequences. On the positive side, imperial pursuits contributed to economic growth by opening new markets for American goods, fostering trade, and increasing industrial profits. The acquisition of colonies like the Philippines and Guam allowed the U.S. to establish strategic military bases, enhancing national security and enabling global naval presence. Additionally, proponents argued that spreading democracy and modern civilization to less developed regions could uplift local populations, aligning with the ideological justifications of American exceptionalism.

However, the negatives of American imperialism were significant. Militarily and politically, imperialism often led to conflict, resistance, and resentment among colonized peoples, exemplified by the Philippine-American War, which was marked by brutal violence and Vietnam-like guerrilla warfare. Ethically, imperialism raised questions about sovereignty, self-determination, and the rights of indigenous populations, as it often entailed the suppression of local cultures and governance. Economically, imperialism sometimes prioritized American corporate interests over the well-being of local populations, fostering dependency rather than sustainable development. Moreover, the extension of American influence contradicted the foundational principles of freedom and democracy upon which the nation was built, leading critics to argue that imperialism was a form of hypocrisy that betrayed American ideals.

In conclusion, while American imperialism facilitated economic and strategic advancements, it also entailed ethical dilemmas and conflict that continue to influence perceptions of U.S. foreign policy today. The dual aspects of expansionism demonstrate the complex legacy of this policy, highlighting both national benefits and moral costs.

References

• Cleveland, W. (2014). The War of 1898: The United States and Cuba in history and historiography. University of North Carolina Press.
• Doyle, M. W. (2001). American imperialism and the cold war. Cambridge University Press.
• Hughes, M. (2005). "Manifest Destiny and American Colonialism." The Journal of American History, 92(3), 931–956.
• Kennedy, P. (1988). The rise and fall of the Great Powers. Random House.
• LaFeber, W. (1984). The American age: United States foreign policy at home and abroad since 1750. W. W. Norton & Company.
• Paget, M. (2010). The Roosevelt foreign policy legacy. Oxford University Press.
• Pierce, J. (2016). American imperialism and the Cuban revolution. Routledge.
• Seagrave, S. (2003). The Soong sisters: The women behind the rise of modern China. HarperCollins.
• Smith, R. (2010). The imperial origins of American foreign policy. Polity Press.
• Wilson, W. (2012). "Marshall Plan and U.S. foreign policy." Foreign Affairs, 91(4), 90–105.