Explain The Abbreviation For A Group Author 588532

Explain The Abbreviation For A Group Author

Question 11 Explain The Abbreviation For A Group Author Question 11 Explain The Abbreviation For A Group Author QUESTION . Explain the abbreviation for a group author ______________ once in the text twice in the text third in the text fourth in the text fifth in the text 1 points could use the materials, tables, figures, and images without crediting prior authors. 1 points QUESTION . Use _________________ for works that have been accepted for publication but have not yet been published. in publication in progress in press in review in peer review 1 points QUESTION . The year in the in-text citation should _____________________ Not match the year in the reference list entry match the year in the reference list entry Not match the year in the body of the paper match the year in the body of the paper match the year in the conclusion of the paper 1 points QUESTION . In-text citations could be parenthetical or narrative. centered or parenthetical narrative or centered one author or two authors narrative or parenthetical parenthetical or informational 1 points QUESTION . Some kinds of works that are not included in a reference list because readers do not need a reference list entry to understand the use. The following are some works that can be excluded from a reference list except? Personal communications such as emails, phone calls, and text messages General mentions of websites, periodicals, and common software, and apps Borrowed material, including direct quotes, paraphrasing, and summaries Quotations from research participants in a student's own study Epigraphs not cited elsewhere in the text of the paper 1 points QUESTION . In scholarly research, a secondary source reports content not reported in another source content first reported in a new source content first reported in another source content reported three times in another source content reported four times in another source 1 points QUESTION . If the reference list has a more specific date (e.g., year, month, and day), how could the in-text citation be listed? Use all the more specific dates listed in the in-text citation Use only the year and month in the in-text citation Use only the year and day in the in-text citation Use only the year in the in-text citation Avoid using the year in the in-text citation 1 points QUESTION . When multiple references have similar or identical authors and publication year include an uppercase letter after the year include a lowercase letter after the year include both uppercase and lowercase letter after the year include the word "similar" after the year include the word "identical" after the year 1 points QUESTION . For prior works with no date, __________________ Do not Use "n.d." in the in-text citation Avoid using "date" in the in-text citation Use "n.d." in the in-text citation Makeup a "date" in the in-text citation Use "any date and n.d." in the in-text citation 1 points QUESTION . Id communications are recoverable only in an archive (for example, a presidential library)___________ cite the communications as presidential materials cite the communications as non-archival materials cite the communications as archival materials cite the communications as special reference materials cite communications as personal materials 1 points QUESTION . Undercitation can lead to ______________________ and overcitation can lead to ________________ plagiarism and distraction non-plagiarism and scholarly support plagiarism and scholarly paper plagiarism and nondistraction non-plagiarism and distraction 1 points QUESTION . For works or research with an unknown author do not include the title and year of publication in the in-text citation include only the title in the in-text citation include the title and year of publication in the in-text citation include only the year of publication in the in-text citation include the only unknown author in the in-text citation 1 points QUESTION . In scholarly research, a primary source reports personal content original content identical content vital content archived content 1 points QUESTION . Allowed Formatting in APA should be consistent throughout the document and could be all of the following except? The font should be consistent throughout the document and can be any of the following except: 12 pt.

Times New Roman 11 pt. Georgia or Calibri or Ariel 10 pt. Computer Modern or Lucida Sans Unicode 11 pt. Ariel 14 pt. Times New Roman or Ariel 1 points QUESTION . Which of this is the correct APA Level 1 Format Left-aligned, Boldface, Uppercase, and Lowercase Heading Indented, boldface, standard case heading with a period (only the first word is capitalized)? Indented, boldface, italicized, lowercase heading with a period. Centered, Boldface, Uppercase and Lowercase Headings Indented, italicized, lowercase heading with a period. 1 points QUESTION . In research paper, each in-text citation must correspond __________ one reference list entry two reference list entry three reference list entry four reference list entry five reference list entry 1 points QUESTION . Include in-text citations for _______________________ Either paraphrases or quotations Neither paraphrases and quotations both paraphrases and quotations both paragraphs and comments only for multiple authors 1 points QUESTION . Which of this is the correct APA Level 5 Format Indented, italicized, lowercase heading with a period Left-aligned, Boldface, Uppercase, and Lowercase Heading Indented, boldface, standard case heading with a period (only the first word is capitalized). Indented, boldface, italicized, lowercase heading with a period. Centered, Boldface, Uppercase and Lowercase Headings 1 points QUESTION . Margins are _________________ 1.5 inch on all sides 2.5 inch on all sides 1 inch on all sides 2 inch on all sides 0.5 inch on all sides This assignment will incorporate a common practical tool in helping clinicians begin to ethically analyze a case.

Organizing the data in this way will help you apply the four principles and four boxes approach. Based on the "Case Study: Healing and Autonomy" and other required topic study materials, you will complete the "Applying the Four Principles: Case Study" document that includes the following: Part 1: Chart This chart will formalize the four principles and four boxes approach and the four-boxes approach by organizing the data from the case study according to the relevant principles of biomedical ethics: autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice. Part 2: Evaluation This part includes questions, to be answered in a total of 500 words, that describe how principalism would be applied according to the Christian worldview.

Remember to support your responses with the topic study materials. APA style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected. Case Study: Healing and Autonomy Mike and Joanne are the parents of James and Samuel, identical twins born 8 years ago. James is currently suffering from acute glomerulonephritis, kidney failure. James was originally brought into the hospital for complications associated with a strep throat infection. The spread of the A streptococcus infection led to the subsequent kidney failure. James’s condition was acute enough to warrant immediate treatment. Usually cases of acute glomerulonephritis caused by strep infection tend to improve on their own or with an antibiotic. However, James also had elevated blood pressure and enough fluid buildup that required temporary dialysis to relieve. The attending physician suggested immediate dialysis. After some time of discussion with Joanne, Mike informs the physician that they are going to forego the dialysis and place their faith in God. Mike and Joanne had been moved by a sermon their pastor had given a week ago, and also had witnessed a close friend regain mobility when she was prayed over at a healing service after a serious stroke. They thought it more prudent to take James immediately to a faith healing service instead of putting James through multiple rounds of dialysis. Yet, Mike and Joanne agreed to return to the hospital after the faith healing services later in the week, and in hopes that James would be healed by then. Two days later the family returned and was forced to place James on dialysis, as his condition had deteriorated. Mike felt perplexed and tormented by his decision to not treat James earlier. Had he not enough faith? Was God punishing him or James? To make matters worse, James's kidneys had deteriorated such that his dialysis was now not a temporary matter and was in need of a kidney transplant. Crushed and desperate, Mike and Joanne immediately offered to donate one of their own kidneys to James, but they were not compatible donors. Over the next few weeks, amidst daily rounds of dialysis, some of their close friends and church members also offered to donate a kidney to James. However, none of them were tissue matches. James’s nephrologist called to schedule a private appointment with Mike and Joanne. James was stable, given the regular dialysis, but would require a kidney transplant within the year. Given the desperate situation, the nephrologist informed Mike and Joanne of a donor that was an ideal tissue match, but as of yet had not been considered—James’s brother Samuel. Mike vacillates and struggles to decide whether he should have his other son Samuel lose a kidney or perhaps wait for God to do a miracle this time around. Perhaps this is where the real testing of his faith will come in? Mike reasons, “This time around it is a matter of life and death. What could require greater faith than that?â€

At the top, the instructions have been cleaned to focus solely on the core assignment. The text is formatted accordingly in HTML with clear semantic structure, covering the case study and ethical considerations.