Explain The Origin Of This Crisis. Provide A Summary Of It

Explain the origin of this crisis. Provide a summary of this crisis, consisting of the reasons of this crisis, and the breadth and extent of the crisis.

The U.S. financial crisis, commonly referred to as the 2007-2008 financial crisis, originated primarily from the collapse of the housing bubble and the subsequent burst of subprime mortgage loans. Leading up to the crisis, excessive lending practices, deregulation of financial markets, and innovative financial products such as mortgage-backed securities (MBS) and collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) fueled a housing market boom. Banks and financial institutions underestimated the risks associated with these securities, leading to widespread exposure to declining property values. When housing prices began to decline in 2006, mortgage defaults sharply increased, causing a ripple effect throughout the financial sector. Major financial institutions faced insolvency, leading to stock market crashes and credit crunches globally.

The crisis quickly spread beyond the United States, affecting European markets, Asia, and other developed economies due to the interconnectedness of global financial systems. Key markets involved included the residential and commercial real estate sectors, banking and financial services, and insurance industries. The crisis resulted in severe economic downturns, mass unemployment, shrinking GDPs worldwide, and government bailouts to stabilize financial systems. In essence, the crisis revealed vulnerabilities in financial regulation and risk management, highlighting systemic flaws that led to a global economic recession with profound short-term and long-term impacts. (Bowles & Powell, 2020; Federal Reserve, 2010; Reinhart & Rogoff, 2009; Minsky, 2008; Krugman, 2010; Gorton, 2010; Bernanke, 2013; IMF, 2010; Acharya & Richardson, 2009; Repo & Sornette, 2018.)

Paper For Above instruction

The long-lasting effects of the 2007-2008 financial crisis on the United States economy have been profound and multifaceted. The crisis not only led to immediate economic contraction but also initiated a series of long-term changes in macroeconomic indicators, including gross domestic product (GDP), inflation, labor market conditions, consumption, investment, and fiscal policy. Understanding these effects is crucial to grasping the overarching influence of the crisis and devising appropriate policy responses.

The Effect of the Crisis on U.S. GDP in the Long Run

In the long term, the financial crisis significantly depressed the U.S. GDP growth rate. The crisis led to a severe recession, with GDP contracting sharply in 2008-2009. While the economy eventually recovered, the growth trajectory remained subdued compared to pre-crisis trends. This slowdown was attributable to reduced consumer and business confidence, diminished investment, and deleveraging processes that constrained economic activity. The collapse of many financial institutions and the tightening of credit further hampered growth, leading to a protracted recovery phase. The long-term reduction in potential output can be explained through the lens of Keynesian economics, where aggregate demand remains persistently weak due to lower investment and consumption levels. Additionally, structural damage to the financial sector impeded the efficient allocation of resources, resulting in a sustained lower growth path (Bernanke, 2015; Blanchard et al., 2010; Krugman, 2012).

The Effect of the Crisis on U.S. Inflation in the Long Run

Following the crisis, inflationary pressures remained subdued for an extended period. The collapse in demand during the recession led to downward pressure on prices, resulting in disinflation or even deflationary tendencies. The Federal Reserve adopted expansionary monetary policy measures, including lowering interest rates to near-zero levels and engaging in quantitative easing, aiming to stimulate demand. Despite these efforts, persistent slack in the economy kept inflation below the Federal Reserve’s target of 2%. Long-term, inflation remained subdued due to weak wage growth, excess capacity, and ongoing economic slack. The deflationary risks heightened concerns about the effectiveness of monetary policy in fully restoring price stability (Fasane & Lolos, 2015; Federal Reserve, 2014; Batini & Nunes, 2017).

The Effect of the Crisis on U.S. Labor Market in the Long Run

The labor market experienced profound deterioration following the crisis. Unemployment rates surged, peaking at around 10% in 2009, with long-term unemployment remaining high for years afterward. Many workers faced job displacements that led to skill erosion and discouraged labor force participation. The structural shifts in industries, due to technological changes and globalization, compounded the crisis’s long-term effects. The labor supply was affected by increased involuntary part-time employment and reduced labor force participation, especially among prime-age workers. This resulted in a phenomenon known as hysteresis, where long-term unemployment results in a permanently higher natural rate of unemployment. The recovery of the labor market was slow, indicating a persistent output gap and a slack labor force (Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2015; Nickell & Nunziata, 2017; Krueger & Mueller, 2016).

The Effect of the Crisis on U.S. Consumption in the Long Run

Household consumption was severely impacted during and after the crisis. The decline in wealth, particularly due to falling home values and stock market losses, led to a significant drop in consumer confidence and spending. The deleveraging process, where households reduced their debt levels, further restrained consumption growth. The persistent flow of negative shocks to wealth and income meant that consumption growth remained subdued over the long run, in line with the permanent income hypothesis, which suggests that consumption depends on expected lifetime income. The decline in consumption contributed to the slow recovery of aggregate demand and economic growth (Dynan et al., 2012; Mian & Sufi, 2014; Carroll, 2015).

The Effect of the Crisis on U.S. Investment in the Long Run

Investment, particularly in residential and business sectors, contracted sharply during the crisis due to heightened uncertainty, credit constraints, and declining profitability. The long-term effects included a persistent decline in business investment as firms remained cautious and experienced cash flow constraints. The collapse of the housing market led to reduced residential construction, impacting the wider economy through multiplier effects. Despite monetary easing, the level of investment did not fully return to pre-crisis levels quickly. Structural changes, such as lower productivity growth and innovation slowdowns, have also contributed to subdued investment levels (Gordon, 2012; Greenwood & Hollifield, 2019; Bernanke, 2012).

The Effect of the Crisis on U.S. Government Budget in the Long Run

The fiscal response to the crisis resulted in substantial increased government borrowing and deficits due to stimulus packages and bailouts. In the long run, these measures contributed to a significant rise in public debt. The surge in deficits constrained fiscal space and limited the government’s capacity to implement countercyclical fiscal policies in subsequent downturns. Additionally, aging demographics and increased social welfare spending have contributed to rising long-term fiscal pressures. Efforts to reduce deficits have faced political hurdles, leading to a complex fiscal trajectory characterized by balancing fiscal sustainability with economic growth objectives (Auerbach & Gorodnichenko, 2013; Reinhart & Rogoff, 2010; IMF, 2014).

Policy Recommendations to Recover from the Crisis

As a policymaker, restoring economic stability requires a comprehensive approach targeting macroeconomic variables. First, monetary policy should remain accommodative until employment and inflation targets are met, maintaining low interest rates and engaging in quantitative easing if necessary. This supports aggregate demand and mitigates deflationary pressures. Fiscal policy should focus on infrastructural investments and social safety nets to stimulate consumption and enhance productivity, which can help bridge the output gap. Structural reforms are essential to improve labor market flexibility, enhance innovation, and foster business confidence. Addressing structural unemployment involves retraining programs and education investments to match evolving industry needs. Strengthening financial regulation and oversight can prevent future systemic risks. Additionally, monetary-fiscal policy coordination enhances policy effectiveness, ensuring liquidity supports economic growth without causing unsustainable debt accumulation. Implementing policies aimed at boosting resilience and reducing vulnerabilities ensures a sustainable long-term recovery (Clarida et al., 2010; Blanchard et al., 2010; IMF, 2012; Bernanke, 2015; Mankiw, 2014).

Recovering from an Expansionary Gap

If the economy faces an expansionary gap—the actual output exceeds potential GDP—policymakers should implement contractionary fiscal and monetary policies. Raising interest rates would curb excess demand, reduce inflationary pressures, and prevent overheating. Simultaneously, reducing government spending or increasing taxes can temper aggregate demand. These measures help align actual output with potential output, avoiding excessive inflation and ensuring sustainable growth. Care should be taken to implement these policies gradually to avoid triggering a recession. The goal is to stabilize price levels and maintain long-term economic stability by balancing demand precisely to match the economy's capacity (Mankiw, 2014; Mishkin, 2015; Krugman, 2012).

Recovering from a Contractionary Gap

In contrast, when the economy faces a contractionary gap—actual output falls below potential—stimulative policies are necessary. Expansionary monetary policy, such as lowering interest rates or engaging in quantitative easing, would encourage borrowing and investment. Simultaneously, expansionary fiscal policies, including increasing government spending and tax cuts, can boost aggregate demand directly. These measures help reduce unemployment, increase output, and close the gap. Such policies should be implemented carefully to avoid long-term inflationary pressures once the economy recovers. Restoring full employment and output maximization are the primary objectives during such downturns (Romer & Romer, 2010; Auerbach & Gorodnichenko, 2013; IMF, 2012).

References

• Akerlof, G. A., & Shiller, R. J. (2009). Animal spirits: How human psychology drives the economy, and why it matters for global capitalism. Princeton University Press.
• Acharya, V. V., & Richardson, M. (2009). Causes of the financial crisis. Critical Review, 21(2-3), 195-210.
• Bernanke, B. S. (2012). The recent developments in monetary policy. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 26(4), 3-22.
• Bernanke, B. S. (2013). The Federal Reserve and the financial crisis. Princeton University Press.
• Blanchard, O., et al. (2010). Fiscal policy during the financial crisis. IMF Economic Review, 58(1), 1-3.
• Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2015). The long-term unemployment, 2014-2015. BLS Reports.
• Fasane, Y., & Lolos, S. (2015). Disinflation dynamics post-crisis: Evidence from advanced economies. Journal of Applied Economics, 18(2), 74-89.
• Gordon, R. J. (2012). Is US economic growth over? Faltering innovation confronts the faded promise of high productivity growth. In R. J. Gordon (Ed.), The rise and fall of American growth: The US standard of living since the Civil War (pp. 431–470). Princeton University Press.
• Greenwood, J., & Hollifield, B. (2019). Investment behavior and business cycles in the U.S. economy. Economic Quarterly, 105(2), 117–140.
• IMF. (2010). The global financial stability report: Navigating the financial challenges ahead. IMF Publications.