Explain Various Approaches To Building High-Performing Teams

Explain various approaches to building high-performing teams. Summarize the benefits of cohesive groups.

Explain various approaches to building high-performing teams. Summarize the benefits of cohesive groups. Reviewing the description, type, and deliverables. Explain your proposed approach for conducting research necessary to develop quality deliverables and explain how the information gleaned will support your career development in management. Please review the approach proposed by other students, providing objective feedback on opportunities for improvement. Consider the following: Assume your role in management, and discuss the scenario with your fellow managers. Spend some time discussing your position and feelings, including opinions, hurt feelings, problems caused in your group, etc. Discuss the model that Bruce Tuckman designed decades ago that is still considered a major work and is used today. Use the Library to review the Tuckman model and decide what phase you are in and the reasons for your conclusion.

Paper For Above instruction

Building high-performing teams is a cornerstone of effective management, requiring varied approaches tailored to specific organizational contexts and team dynamics. The primary strategies include forming clear goals, fostering open communication, establishing trust, promoting mutual accountability, and encouraging continuous development. Implementing team-building activities, leveraging diverse skills, and providing decisive leadership are also critical for cultivating high performance. These strategies contribute to cohesive groups, which enjoy numerous benefits, including increased productivity, enhanced morale, innovation, and resilience in facing challenges. Cohesion promotes trust and cooperation, creating an environment conducive to achieving common objectives efficiently.

The description, type, and deliverables of a high-performing team depend on organizational goals. For instance, project teams deliver specific outputs within deadlines, while functional teams maintain ongoing operations. Regardless of type, the deliverables should align with strategic objectives, measurable in terms of quality, efficiency, and effectiveness. Ensuring clarity of roles and expectations, along with fostering a collaborative culture, supports the development of successful teams.

My proposed research approach involves a mixed-methods strategy combining qualitative interviews and quantitative surveys to gather comprehensive insights into team dynamics and performance. Qualitative interviews with team members and leaders will uncover nuanced perceptions of team functioning, while surveys will quantify factors such as communication patterns, trust levels, and motivation. Analyzing this data will highlight strengths and areas for improvement, informing targeted interventions. This approach will not only help develop high-quality deliverables aligned with organizational goals but also advance my management skills by understanding the underlying mechanisms of team success.

Supporting my career development, this research will refine my skills in data collection, analysis, and evidence-based decision-making. It will enhance my ability to diagnose team issues accurately and implement effective strategies to foster high performance, which are crucial competencies for advanced management roles.

Reviewing other students' proposed approaches provides valuable opportunities for refinement. Objective feedback might suggest expanding the scope of research to include external factors affecting team dynamics or incorporating longitudinal studies to assess changes over time. Constructive critique helps fine-tune methodologies, ensuring more robust findings that can directly influence leadership practices.

Assuming a management role involves reflective practice and honest communication about team challenges. For instance, I might discuss feelings of frustration when team members miss deadlines or misunderstand responsibilities, acknowledging how such issues hinder progress. Sharing these sentiments with colleagues fosters a collaborative problem-solving environment.

Bruce Tuckman’s model, developed in the 1960s, describes four fundamental team development phases: forming, storming, norming, and performing. Recently, some scholars expanded this model to include a disbanding phase. Currently, I perceive my team is in the norming stage, characterized by the establishment of roles, development of cohesion, and increased collaboration. This conclusion is based on observed behaviors such as open communication, shared leadership, and conflict resolution, indicating progress toward high performance.

Understanding which phase my team occupies enables targeted interventions to facilitate the next stage—performing—where productivity is high, and team members operate independently toward shared goals. Recognizing the phase also allows for strategic management tailored to team needs, fostering continuous growth and success.

References

• Bell, S. T. (2007). Deep-Level Composition Variables as Predictors of Team Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3), 594–615.
• Goleman, D. (2000). Leadership That Gets Results. Harvard Business Review, 78(2), 78–90.
• Hersey, P., Blanchard, K. H., & Johnson, D. E. (2012). Management of Organizational Behavior: Utilizing Human Resources. Pearson Education.
• Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). Joining Together: Group Theory and Group Skills. Pearson Education.
• Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (1993). The Wisdom of Teams: Creating the High-Performance Organization. Harvard Business Press.
• McShane, S. L., & Glinow, M. A. V. (2018). Organizational Behavior: Emerging Knowledge. Global Reality. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2019). Organizational Behavior. Pearson.
• Schwalbe, K. (2018). Information Technology Project Management. Cengage Learning.
• Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group Process and Productivity. Academic Press.
• Wheelan, S. A. (2005). The Handbook of Group Communication Theory and Research. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.