Explain Why Companies Continually Evaluate Their Strategies

Explain Why Companies Continually Evaluate Their Strategies Rather

1. Explain why companies continually evaluate their strategies, rather than waiting until the end of the quarter or fiscal year to engage in the three core strategy evaluation activities discussed in chapter 9. 2. How does an organization know if it is pursuing “optimal” strategies? 3. Regarding the strategic planning process, give four “should be” guidelines and four “should not be” guidelines. Please use below for reference. David, F.R. Strategic Management: Concept and Cases (17th ed.).

Paper For Above instruction

Strategic management is a dynamic and ongoing process vital to the sustained success of any organization. Companies continually evaluate their strategies rather than confining assessment to quarterly or annual reviews because the business environment is inherently volatile and unpredictable. Continuous evaluation allows organizations to adapt swiftly to internal changes, such as operational inefficiencies or shifts in organizational capabilities, and external shifts, including market dynamics, technological advancements, or competitive pressures. Waiting until the end of a quarter or fiscal year could lead to missed opportunities, the persistence of ineffective strategies, and increased risks. By constantly monitoring and adjusting their strategies, companies ensure they remain aligned with their long-term goals and external realities, fostering agility and resilience in a competitive landscape.

Regarding the pursuit of “optimal” strategies, an organization can assess whether it is on the right track by examining several indicators. First, performance metrics such as profitability, market share, and growth rate provide quantitative evidence of success. Second, external stakeholder feedback, including customer satisfaction and supplier relationships, illustrate whether the strategy aligns with external expectations and needs. Third, the organization’s internal capabilities and resources should support the strategic objectives; if they are underutilized or misaligned, the strategy may not be optimal. Lastly, strategic flexibility is crucial—an optimal strategy should be adaptable, allowing the organization to respond to unforeseen challenges and opportunities effectively. These measures collectively help determine if a company’s strategy is truly optimal in guiding it toward long-term sustainability and competitive advantage.

In the strategic planning process, establishing “should be” and “should not be” guidelines is essential for effective strategy formulation and implementation. “Should be” guidelines include: 1) Align strategies with the organization’s mission and core values to ensure consistency and purpose; 2) base strategic decisions on comprehensive external and internal environmental analyses; 3) foster stakeholder engagement and ensure diverse input to enrich strategic perspectives; 4) incorporate flexibility to allow strategic adjustments in response to changing conditions. Conversely, “should not be” guidelines include: 1) Develop strategies in isolation without considering internal capabilities or external market realities; 2) rigidly adhere to initial plans without evaluating ongoing performance and making necessary adjustments; 3) ignore stakeholder interests and feedback, risking misalignment with market or societal expectations; 4) focus solely on short-term gains at the expense of sustainable long-term growth. These guidelines help organizations craft effective strategies that are both realistic and adaptable, ultimately fostering organizational resilience and strategic success.

References

• David, F. R. (2017). Strategic Management: Concepts and Cases (17th ed.). Pearson.
• Barney, J. B., & Hesterly, W. S. (2019). Strategic Management and Competitive Advantage: Concepts and Cases (6th ed.). Pearson.
• Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.
• Johnson, G., Scholes, K., & Whittington, R. (2017). Exploring Corporate Strategy. Pearson.
• Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (1998). Strategy Safari: A Guided Tour Through The Wilds of Strategic Management. Free Press.
• Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Harvard Business School Press.
• Ansoff, H. I. (1988). The New Corporate Strategy. McGraw-Hill.
• Chaffee, E. (1985). Three Models of Strategy. Academy of Management Review, 10(1), 89-98.
• Hambrick, D. C., & Fredrickson, J. W. (2001). Are you sure you have a strategy? Academy of Management Executive, 15(4), 48-59.
• Wheelen, T. L., & Hunger, J. D. (2018). Strategic Management and Business Policy: Globalization, Innovation, and Sustainability (15th ed.). Pearson.