Extreme Nonverbals Using Communication

Extreme Nonverbalsextreme Nonverbalsusing The Communication Process

Choose a specific nonverbal code from the types listed in your course text (e.g., facial expressions, haptics, proxemics, chronemics, kinesics). Determine the unwritten social norms or rules associated with this code. Select several locations—such as on campus, at home, at work—and intentionally break these norms or rules. Observe and reflect on the reactions to your behavior, considering both your own and others’ responses. Write a detailed report describing your experiences, the social norms involved, how you broke them, the reactions observed, and your reflections on the process and its implications for communication.

Paper For Above instruction

In exploring the intricacies of nonverbal communication, this study focuses on kinesics—the use of body language, gestures, posture, and facial expressions—as a vital nonverbal code deeply embedded within social norms. Kinesics plays an integral role in conveying attitudes, emotions, and social cues, often operating outside conscious awareness of both sender and receiver. The unwritten rules governing kinesics vary across cultures and contexts, dictating acceptable physical behaviors and gestures during interactions in different settings such as academic environments, workplaces, and personal spaces.

The primary objective of this assignment was to intentionally breach specific kinesic norms in selected locations to observe the resultant reactions and deepen understanding of nonverbal communication's role within social norms. The locations chosen were the university campus, my workplace, and my home, each representing different social contexts with distinct expectations. The norm selected for violation was maintaining a comfortable personal space distance—an unwritten rule generally dictating that individuals keep a respectful space based on cultural and situational contexts. This norm can be different culturally; for example, some cultures prefer close physical proximity, while others value more personal space.

At the university campus, I stood unusually close to a classmate during a casual conversation—reducing the typical distance by almost half of what is considered socially acceptable in Western norms. Normally, personal space in such settings ranges approximately 1.5 to 4 feet, depending on familiarity. I intentionally encroached into this personal space. The immediate reaction was noticeable discomfort; my classmate stepped back, avoided eye contact, and subtly wiped their face, indicating unease. These reactions underscored the importance of spatial norms in maintaining comfort and rapport.

At my workplace, I chose to breach the personal distance norm during a team meeting. Instead of occupying my assigned seat and maintaining appropriate space from colleagues, I moved closer to a coworker and leaned in during our discussion without invitation. The colleague looked visibly surprised, shifting slightly away and adjusting their position to regain space. This reaction showcased how breaches of kinesic norms in professional settings can disrupt rapport and create tension, emphasizing the implicit nature of these unwritten rules in maintaining professionalism and social harmony.

At my home, I broke kinesic norms by standing very close to a family member during a conversation, even when not directly invited to do so. Typically, family members are comfortable with closer proximity, but the extent of my encroachment exceeded usual comfort levels. The family member's response was a slight step back, a brief awkward silence, and a change in the tone of the conversation. This illustrated that even within familiar relationships, unwritten spatial norms are violated when boundaries are perceived as being ignored, potentially leading to discomfort or misinterpretation.

Reflecting on these experiences, it is evident that unwritten kinesic norms are fundamental for smooth social interactions. Violating these norms often elicits observable discomfort, avoidance behaviors, or subtle cues signaling unease. These reactions serve as social feedback, reinforcing the importance of respecting body language cues and personal space in various contexts. The reactions also highlight cultural variability; in some cultures, close proximity is considered normal and friendly, whereas, in others, it may be intrusive or aggressive.

This experiment underscored that nonverbal cues operate alongside verbal communication, enriching interactions while also maintaining social boundaries. The reactions observed reinforced the idea that nonverbal messages—particularly kinesics—are powerful communicative tools governed by social norms that regulate their usage. Understanding these norms is essential not only for effective communication across different contexts but also for fostering respect and cultural sensitivity in diverse social environments.

In conclusion, intentionally breaking kinesic norms allowed for firsthand observation of the subtle yet significant ways nonverbal behaviors influence social interactions. The discomfort or awkwardness resulting from norm violations exemplifies the function of unwritten social rules that preserve social harmony. Respecting personal space and other nonverbal cues is critical in establishing trust, comfort, and understanding within interpersonal communications. This experience highlights the importance of perceptiveness and cultural awareness in decoding and respecting nonverbal communicative norms.

References

• Burgoon, J. K., Guerrero, L. K., & Floyd, K. (2016). Nonverbal Communication. Routledge.
• Knapp, M. L., & Hall, J. A. (2010). Nonverbal Communication in Human Interaction. Wadsworth Publishing.
• Samovar, L. A., Porter, R. E., & McDaniel, E. R. (2016). Communication Between Cultures. Cengage Learning.
• DeVito, J. A. (2019). The Interpersonal Communication Book. Pearson.
• Pease, A., & Pease, B. (2004). The Definitive Book of Body Language. Bantam Books.
• Hall, E. T. (1966). The hidden dimension. Doubleday.
• Mehrabian, A. (1971). Silent messages. Wadsworth.
• Argyle, M. (1988). Bodily Communication. Routledge.
• Floyd, K. (2011). Interpersonal Communication. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1969). The repertoire of nonverbal behavior: Categories, origins, and functions. Seminar in Psychiatric Research, 3(4), 64-96.