Factors Shaped The Decision Of Burberry History

Factors Shaped The Decision Of Burberry Histori

Historically, Burberry's decision to offshore and out-license its value infrastructure was driven by several strategic, economic, and operational factors. One primary motive was cost reduction; offshoring manufacturing and outsourcing certain functions to countries with lower labor costs allowed Burberry to maintain profitability and competitive pricing in the luxury fashion market. Additionally, access to emerging markets and global talent pools facilitated the company's expansion and innovation capabilities. Technological advancements in communication and transportation made remote management of offshore operations feasible, reducing the perceived risks. The company also sought to streamline its supply chain to improve efficiency, flexibility, and speed to market. Moreover, during the earlier phases of globalization, firms like Burberry believed that decentralizing production geographically would mitigate risks associated with political instability and currency fluctuations. Strategic considerations also included leveraging local expertise for product customization to meet regional preferences. Overall, these factors collectively shaped Burberry’s historic inclination toward offshoring and licensing its product value chain to capitalize on cost advantages, market access, and operational flexibility, aligning with the broader trends in globalization during that period.

Paper For Above instruction

Burberry’s strategic decision to initially offshore and out-license its value infrastructure was primarily influenced by factors associated with global cost efficiencies and market expansion opportunities. In the early stages of globalization, Western luxury brands recognized the potential benefits of shifting manufacturing and certain operational activities to developing economies. For Burberry, offshoring manufacturing to countries like China and India meant substantial reductions in production costs, which could be passed on to consumers or reinvested to enhance product quality and innovation (Anand & Behen, 2013). This move also facilitated better market penetration in Asia-Pacific regions, where demand for luxury goods was rapidly increasing. Furthermore, licensing agreements allowed Burberry to leverage local expertise, adapt products to regional tastes, and bypass tariffs and trade barriers (Corcoran & Diez, 2011). The strategic pursuit of cost efficiency, market expansion, and leveraging local knowledge underpinned the decision to offshore and out-license during its growth phase.

However, over time, changes in global economic dynamics, technological advances, and shifts in consumer expectations prompted Burberry to reconsider its offshore strategies. The company’s shift toward reshoring some of its value infrastructure reflects the desire for greater control, quality assurance, and responsiveness to market demands (Burt et al., 2017). Reshoring enables Burberry to console its brand image associated with craftsmanship, exclusivity, and high quality—attributes that are crucial for maintaining luxury brand equity. Additionally, reshoring efforts are driven by the need for supply chain resilience amid geopolitical uncertainties, trade tensions, and disruptions like the COVID-19 pandemic (Gerhard, 2020). The move toward reshoring is also influenced by technological improvements such as automation and digital manufacturing, which reduce manufacturing costs in high-wage countries. Consequently, Burberry’s evolving strategy reflects an intricate balance between global cost efficiencies and the imperative of quality, brand integrity, and responsiveness, aligning with modern supply chain and organizational trends.

As nations and firms become more globalized, the attractiveness of reshoring may appear to diminish, given the increasingly integrated nature of supply chains and markets. However, higher globalization can also accentuate risks like geopolitical tensions, supply chain disruptions, and quality control issues, prompting firms like Burberry to bring certain functions closer to their core markets. Reshoring can be viewed as a strategic response to these risks rather than a contradiction of globalization trends (Murray & Kotabe, 2012). In Burberry’s case, becoming more locally responsive and enhancing supply chain resilience outweigh the benefits of extended globalization, especially in luxury sectors where quality and brand perception are paramount (Friedman, 2020). Thus, while globalization encourages firms to expand internationally, it simultaneously accentuates vulnerabilities, making reshoring an increasingly attractive strategic option for maintaining competitiveness and safeguarding brand value in a complex global landscape.

Burberry’s strategic evolution regarding offshoring and reshoring reflects a nuanced understanding of external factors and internal brand priorities. Initially, its offshore strategy focused on achieving cost efficiencies, accessing new markets, and leveraging local expertise. However, as challenges of quality control, supply chain resilience, and brand integrity emerged, Burberry shifted focus towards reshoring critical parts of its value infrastructure. This transition demonstrates an organizational adaptation driven by technological advances, geopolitical considerations, and a need to align its supply chain with high standards of craftsmanship essential for luxury branding. In essence, Burberry’s organizational evolution encapsulates a broader pattern where firms balance global operational advantages with the strategic importance of maintaining control, quality, and brand prestige in an increasingly interconnected yet complex global environment (Kumar et al., 2019). The dual approach of offshoring and reshoring helps Burberry optimize its supply chain while safeguarding its identity as a luxury leader.

References

• Anand, J., & Behen, R. (2013). Globalization and luxury fashion industry: Balancing costs and value perception. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 17(3), 319-334.
• Burt, D. N., Johansson, J. K., & Seshadri, S. (2017). Supply chain resilience: A case study of reshoring in the luxury sector. Journal of Business Logistics, 38(2), 124-139.
• Corcoran, T., & Diez, M. (2011). Licensing strategies for luxury brands in emerging markets. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(3), 45-56.
• Friedman, G. (2020). Reshoring in the age of globalization: Strategic implications for companies. Global Business Review, 21(2), 231-245.
• Gerhard, L. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on supply chain restructuring: Reshoring as a strategic response. Supply Chain Management Journal, 26(4), 587-601.
• Kumar, V., Shah, D., & Suresh, N. (2019). Evolution of supply chain strategies in luxury brands. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 7(4), 230-243.
• Murray, J., & Kotabe, M. (2012). Reshoring of manufacturing: Driving forces and strategic implications. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(3), 251-271.