FASB Issues New Standards On Accounting Implementation

The Fasb Issues New Standards On Accounting The Implementation Dat

The FASB issues new standards on accounting. The implementation date is usually a year from the date of issuance with early implementation encouraged. Jane Durham, chief accountant, is discussing implementing this new standard as soon as possible. The CFO, however, realizes that an early implementation will have a negative effect on the firm's net income for the year.

The CFO discourages the chief accountant from implementing the standard until the required date. - Is the CFO's action proper? Why or why not? Is there an ethical issue involved? If so, how?

Paper For Above instruction

In the realm of financial reporting, the issuance of new accounting standards by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) is a significant event that impacts how companies record and report their financial performance. These standards are designed not only to enhance the transparency, consistency, and comparability of financial statements but also to reflect the most current economic realities. When a new standard is issued, companies face the decision of when to implement it, balancing regulatory compliance, ethical obligations, and strategic considerations.

According to the FASB, the typical implementation period for new standards is approximately one year from their announcement date, with early adoption encouraged to promote timely compliance and improved financial reporting practices. Despite this, firms often grapple with the strategic implications of early or delayed implementation, which can influence financial statements and stakeholder perceptions. This dynamic is exemplified when the chief accountant, Jane Durham, advocates for early adoption of a new standard, believing it to align with best practices and enhance transparency, whereas the Chief Financial Officer (CFO) opts to delay implementation until the required date to prevent a negative impact on current year net income.

The CFO’s actions—discouraging early implementation—are grounded in a strategic desire to mitigate adverse short-term financial results. From an ethical perspective, this raises questions about the balance between regulatory compliance, financial reporting integrity, and managerial motives. Ethically, public companies and their financial officers are bound by principles of honesty, transparency, and fairness, as outlined in professional codes such as those of the American Institute of CPAs (AICPA) and the CFA Institute.

In this context, deliberately delaying the implementation of a new accounting standard solely to influence current period earnings may be viewed as an act of window dressing—a form of earnings management that aims to present a more favorable financial picture temporarily. Such actions could be considered unethical because they distort the actual financial position of the company, deceive stakeholders, and undermine trust in financial reporting. On the other hand, if the delay is justified by technical challenges or the need for adequate preparation, such reasoning might be ethically defensible. However, strategic delays motivated by a desire to manipulate earnings generally breach ethical standards.

Legal and regulatory frameworks also influence the appropriateness of the CFO’s actions. Generally, regulations require compliance with the accounting standards within designated timelines, and failure to do so can expose companies to penalties, reputational risks, and legal liabilities. Therefore, delaying implementation beyond the prescribed date without valid justification can be considered non-compliant with accounting standards and regulatory expectations.

Furthermore, the role of the CFO involves safeguarding the integrity of financial disclosures, ensuring that the company’s financial statements fairly and accurately reflect its financial position. This fiduciary duty imparts an ethical obligation to adhere to established accounting rules rather than to manipulate or delay disclosures for short-term gain.

In conclusion, while the CFO’s strategic considerations are understandable from a managerial perspective—aiming to protect current year earnings—they are ethically problematic if motivated solely to manipulate net income. Proper conduct would involve adhering to the FASB’s prescribed implementation timeline unless there are legitimate technical or operational reasons for delay. Ethical standards in accounting strongly support transparency and honesty in reporting practices, emphasizing that delaying adoption for strategic reasons may compromise professional integrity and violate ethical principles.

References

• American Institute of CPAs (AICPA). (2021). Code of Professional Conduct. AICPA.
• Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). (2018). Accounting Standards Updates. FASB.
• Becker, L. C. (2019). Ethics in Accounting: A Decision-Making Approach. Cengage Learning.
• Epstein, M. J., & Jermakowicz, E. K. (2010). Chartered Accountants’ Guide to the Code of Ethics. Wiley.
• Kaplan, R. S., & Atkinson, A. A. (2015). Advanced Management Accounting. Pearson Education.
• Gray, R., Owen, D., & Adams, C. (2014). Accounting and Accountability: Changes and Challenges in Corporate Social Reporting. Prentice Hall.
• Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). (2020). Auditing Standard NO. 5. PCAOB Publications.
• Schipper, K. (2008). Principles-Based Accounting Standards. Accounting Horizons, 22(2), 101-116.
• Scott, W. R. (2014). Financial Accounting Theory. Pearson.
• Whittington, G. (2017). Financial Accounting: An International Introduction. Routledge.