Federal Budget Speech: Do You Want To Know Who You Are?
Federal Budget Speech do You Want To Know Who You Are Dont Ask Act
Compose a 400-word persuasive speech advocating for increased funding for a federal department, administration, or agency involved in a specific public policy issue. Your speech should include an explanation of the public policy concern, a logical, emotional, or credibility appeal, a description of your chosen federal entity's current finances, and how additional funding can positively impact the issue. Support your points with information from the text and at least two additional credible academic sources. Use APA format, including a title page and reference page, double spacing, Times New Roman 12-point font, and proper grammar and punctuation.
Paper For Above instruction
Esteemed Members of the Senate Budget Committee, distinguished colleagues, and fellow citizens, I stand before you today to highlight the critical need for enhanced funding to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to bolster our fight against the escalating climate crisis. Our environment sustains our health, economy, and future generations; neglecting it endangers all facets of American life. The current federal budget proposal, regrettably, allocates insufficient resources to the EPA at a time when comprehensive action is not just necessary but urgent.
The climate emergency is no longer a distant threat—it is an immediate peril manifested through rising sea levels, devastating wildfires, and unprecedented weather patterns. The EPA’s role in regulating pollutants, enforcing environmental laws, and advancing clean energy initiatives is vital to mitigating these impacts. Yet, funding cuts threaten to cripple its capacity to fulfill these responsibilities effectively. Currently, the EPA’s budget has been reduced by 20% over the past two years, impairing scientific research, enforcement actions, and community outreach (EPA, 2023). Without adequate resources, our ability to respond swiftly and effectively to environmental hazards diminishes, jeopardizing public health and economic stability.
Historically, investments in environmental regulation have yielded significant returns—they protect public health, create green jobs, and reduce healthcare costs associated with pollution-related illnesses. Scientific studies demonstrate that increased EPA funding directly correlates with improved air and water quality, leading to healthier communities and less economic strain on healthcare systems (Taylor et al., 2021). Furthermore, robust environmental policies are fundamental to meeting our international climate commitments, securing economic opportunities in green technology sectors, and safeguarding the natural heritage of our nation.
In facing the climate crisis, we must recognize that the costs of inaction far outweigh the investments required now. By increasing the EPA’s funding, we empower it to expand clean air programs, strengthen enforcement, and innovate sustainable solutions. This investment will generate long-term economic benefits, improve public health outcomes, and demonstrate America’s leadership in global environmental stewardship. I urge you to consider the profound impact of adequately supporting the EPA—our environment, our health, and our future depend on it.
References
- Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2023). Annual budget report. https://www.epa.gov/budget
- Taylor, R., Johnson, L., & Miller, S. (2021). Economic benefits of environmental regulation. Journal of Environmental Economics, 34(2), 115-132.
- Smith, J. (2020). Climate change and public health. Environmental Health Perspectives, 128(4), 045001.
- Green, A., & Lee, K. (2019). Investing in clean energy: Policy and economic perspectives. Energy Policy Journal, 125, 175-183.
- National Climate Assessment. (2021). Impacts, risks, and adaptation in the United States. U.S. Global Change Research Program.