Federalism: Politics Yesterday, Today, And Tomorrow

Federalism2politics Yesterday Today And Tomorrow1student Namepr

Discuss the first civil liberty or civil rights event, including its name or title and date, what happened during the event, how it influenced responses by political leaders or agencies in a socially responsible manner, and how it affected their ethical or social responsibility toward the community. Repeat this process for the second civil liberty or civil rights event. Additionally, describe the first media coverage of an event, including its name/title, date, what happened, whether the media supported or opposed it and why, and how this coverage changed public perception of the responsible government agency. Then, analyze two issues supported by either the Republican or Democratic Party that may impact the American people either positively or negatively, including the reasons for the support and the effects on the community.

Paper For Above instruction

The evolution of civil liberties and civil rights in the United States has been marked by pivotal events that fundamentally altered the legal and social landscape of the nation. Understanding these events, their media coverage, and political party positions provides insight into how democracy and social responsibility have developed over time.

First Civil Rights/Event: The Brown v. Board of Education (1954)

The landmark Supreme Court case Brown v. Board of Education, decided in 1954, declared racial segregation in public schools unconstitutional. During the event, the Court's decision overturned the Plessy v. Ferguson ruling of 1896, which had established the “separate but equal” doctrine. This ruling significantly advanced civil rights by mandating desegregation, challenging systematic racial discrimination, and promoting equality in education. The decision influenced federal and state responses by encouraging civil rights activism and leading to the enforcement of desegregation orders, illustrating a socially responsible response to systemic injustice. Political leaders, recognizing the importance of racial equality, supported measures to implement desegregation, demonstrating an ethical commitment to social justice and equity. This event also prompted government agencies to promote equal access to education, fostering societal progress toward racial integration and fairness (Wilson et al., 2014).

Second Civil Rights/Event: The Civil Rights Act of 1964

Passed in 1964, the Civil Rights Act outlawed discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin, and was a direct response to the Civil Rights Movement. During its enactment, the legislation prohibited segregation in public places and employment discrimination, marking a significant shift toward legal equality. The event garnered broad support from civil rights activists and was supported by many political leaders committed to social justice. The media widely covered the passage, with positive coverage emphasizing the importance of ending racial discrimination, although some outlets criticized the legislation, reflecting societal divisions. Media support, especially from progressive outlets, helped shape public perception by reinforcing the need for equality and fair treatment. Over time, media coverage increased awareness and pressure for government agencies to enforce civil rights laws actively, highlighting the importance of social responsibility in promoting justice (Wilson et al., 2014).

Media Coverage of an Event: The Kent State Shooting (1970)

The Kent State shootings occurred on May 4, 1970, during protests against the Vietnam War at Kent State University. National media reported extensively on the incident, where the Ohio National Guard fired on protesting students, killing four and injuring nine others. The media coverage was predominantly negative, criticizing government authorities for using excessive force against students exercising free speech, which they viewed as a violation of civil liberties. This coverage significantly shifted public opinion, causing widespread outrage and decreasing trust in government responses to dissent. The media played a crucial role in exposing governmental overreach, forcing political leaders to reevaluate their approach to protest and civil liberties, thus demonstrating social responsibility by advocating for accountability and protecting democratic rights (Wilson et al., 2014).

Political Party Support: Climate Change Policy

The Republican Party generally opposed comprehensive federal policies on climate change, citing concerns over economic impacts and governmental overreach. They support policies favoring deregulation and market-based solutions, believing that free-market mechanisms can effectively address environmental issues. This stance impacts Americans by promoting economic growth and energy independence but risks downplaying the urgency of environmental sustainability. Conversely, the Democratic Party advocates for stronger federal action on climate change, supporting renewable energy initiatives and stricter environmental regulations. They argue that such policies protect public health and ensure long-term sustainability, positively impacting future generations. However, critics claim these policies could increase costs and hinder economic growth temporarily (Wilson et al., 2014). These differing approaches reflect profound ideological divides but significantly influence national policy directions and their impact on society.

References

• Wilson, J. Q., DiIulio, J. J., & Bose, M. (2014). American government: Brief version. (11th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage.