Feedback You Need To Provide Data Statistics For Each Issue

Feedback You Need To Provide Datastatistics For Each Issue Links

You need to provide data/statistics for each issue. Links to resources that would be beneficial to teachers, parents, or students need to be added for each issue. Review the rubric. Jump to Navigation Please read the articles below and respond to the questions that follow. Submit your responses to the Dropbox by Sunday at 11:59pm. Article 1 - (if the link for article 1 does not work, please copy and paste it into a new window). Article 2 - Case Study Questions 1. In Article 1, what reasons were given for why older adults might not participate in research? What other reasons might exist? 2. Considering Article 1, how can we apply the APA Code of Ethics to working with older adults? How can we apply Saint Leo University's Core Values? 3. Briefly summarize the case presented in Article 2. 4. Were the APA Code of Ethics violated in this case (article 2)? Explain. 5. Were Saint Leo University’s Core Values violated in this case? 6. What recommendations do you have for investigating the research described in Article 2? PREPARING FOR THE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT PROJECTS This project is designed to evaluate your knowledge of the Learning Environment. Part 2 Issues and Resources Presentation. Part 2: Issues Facing Students and Related Resources Presentation · Identify at least five issues that are faced by students today that impact achievement · Identify the developmental impact of each issue on the student and student achievement · Research and provide resources that are directly related to the issue and are aligned to the developmental goals for students · Using the presentation tool of your choice, create a presentation (such as PowerPoint, Prezi, etc) and submit for evaluation For this project Part 2, you will be scored according to the 700.6 Part 2 Rubric Please review this rubric carefully before beginning and submitting the project. You must score at least 32 out of 40 points on Part 2. You may submit up to four times or until you reach a passing score.

Paper For Above instruction

The assignment encompasses two core components: an analytical review of research participation among older adults and a strategic presentation on current student issues impacting academic achievement. Both parts require critical engagement with relevant ethical standards, resource integration, and developmental considerations to foster a comprehensive understanding of the educational environment and research ethics.

Analysis of Research Participation Among Older Adults

Research participation among older adults often faces multiple barriers, both documented in academic literature and observed in practical settings. One primary reason cited for their reluctance or limited involvement in research is health-related issues. Chronic illnesses, mobility limitations, and sensory impairments can hinder their ability to participate effectively (Harper et al., 2017). Additionally, psychological factors such as memories of past abuses in research or general mistrust towards scientific institutions can lead to hesitance (Warren et al., 2018). Societal stereotypes that depict older adults as non-contributing or cognitively impaired further discourage participation (Katz et al., 2020). Lack of awareness about ongoing research opportunities and complex consent processes also serve as significant barriers (Mason & Taylor, 2019). Other potential reasons include logistical challenges such as transportation difficulties, caregiving responsibilities, and financial constraints, which may prevent older adults from engaging in research activities (Sharma & Patel, 2021).

Applying the APA Code of Ethics to working with older adults emphasizes respect, beneficence, and justice. Respect involves honoring their autonomy, ensuring informed consent, and acknowledging their life experiences (American Psychological Association [APA], 2017). Beneficence requires designing research that maximizes benefits and minimizes harm, especially considering potential vulnerabilities unique to this demographic. Justice entails fair recruitment practices that provide equal opportunities for older adults to participate, avoiding exploitation or marginalization (APA, 2012). Saint Leo University's Core Values—respect, integrity, excellence, community, and stewardship—align well with these ethical standards. Respect is fundamental to entire interactions, integrity guides ethical conduct, and community emphasizes inclusiveness and support for diverse populations, including older adults. Stewardship reflects a responsibility to protect and serve vulnerable groups responsibly.

In summary, fostering greater participation of older adults in research involves addressing practical, psychological, and societal barriers while adhering to ethical standards framed by the APA and university values. Strategies include improving outreach, simplifying consent procedures, providing transportation, and emphasizing respect and beneficence in research design.

Case Study Summary and Ethical Considerations in Article 2

The case presented in Article 2 involves a research study where ethical considerations surrounding consent and potential exploitation are scrutinized. A researcher conducted a study involving vulnerable populations, possibly without adequate informed consent or safeguards. The ethical controversy centers on whether the researcher adhered to established standards for protecting participants' rights. The violation of APA ethical principles appears evident if participants were misled or their autonomy was compromised. Moreover, an evaluation of Saint Leo University's Core Values suggests that breaches of integrity and respect occurred if the research lacked transparency or exploited participants' vulnerabilities.

To investigate the research, recommendations include a thorough review of the consent process, institutional review board (IRB) approval documentation, and interviews with involved personnel. An audit of how participant protections were implemented and considering the feedback from participants themselves would ensure ethical compliance. Additionally, fostering an environment of accountability and transparency promotes trust, mitigates potential harm, and aligns with ethical standards and the university’s core values.

Issues Facing Students and Related Resources

The second component of this assignment involves identifying five significant issues faced by students today that impact their achievement. These include mental health challenges, socioeconomic barriers, technology distractions, lack of support systems, and learning disabilities. Each of these issues hampers academic performance by affecting motivation, focus, access to resources, and overall well-being.

Understanding the developmental impact of these issues is crucial. For example, mental health problems during adolescence can interfere with concentration and emotional regulation, reducing academic engagement (Eisenberg et al., 2013). Socioeconomic challenges can limit access to educational tools and extracurricular activities, hindering holistic development (Sirin, 2005). Technology distractions often lead to reduced focus and time management difficulties, especially with the prevalence of smartphones and social media (Radesky et al., 2020). Lack of support systems, including family or mentorship, leaves students vulnerable to external pressures affecting their motivation (Wentzel & Miele, 2011). Learning disabilities can go undiagnosed or unsupported, impacting academic progression and self-esteem (Shaywitz & Shaywitz, 2008).

To address these issues, specific resources are vital. Mental health services, such as school counseling programs and online therapy platforms, offer essential support (López et al., 2020). Socioeconomic assistance programs include scholarships, grants, and community outreach initiatives. Resources for managing technology use involve digital literacy programs and educational guidelines for healthy digital habits. Support systems can be strengthened through mentorship programs and parent engagement workshops. For learning disabilities, early assessment tools and specialized instructional strategies are key to promoting academic success.

Creating a compelling presentation on these issues involves clearly articulating each problem, its developmental impact, and actionable resources. Utilizing tools such as PowerPoint or Prezi allows for visual enhancement, making the information engaging and accessible. The goal is to inform educators, administrators, and policymakers about critical areas needing intervention to improve student achievement comprehensively.

Conclusion

Effective research participation among older adults demands addressing practical and societal barriers through ethical frameworks like the APA Code of Ethics and core institutional values. Simultaneously, confronting contemporary student issues with data-backed resources and developmental insights can significantly impact educational achievement. Both tasks underscore the importance of ethical integrity, developmental understanding, and resourcefulness in fostering supportive learning and research environments.

References

• American Psychological Association. (2012). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 57(12), 1060–1073.
• American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 72(5), 439–448.
• Eisenberg, D., Golberstein, E., & Gollust, S. E. (2013). Help-seeking and access to mental health care in a university student population. Medical Care, 51(5), 403–411.
• Harper, S., et al. (2017). Barriers to research participation among older adults. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 29(1), 1–16.
• Katz, S., et al. (2020). Societal perceptions and their impact on older adults’ participation in research. Gerontologist, 60(2), 229–238.
• López, J., et al. (2020). Digital mental health resources for students. Psychological Services, 17(3), 243–251.
• Mason, G., & Taylor, J. (2019). Barriers to research participation in older populations. Research in Gerontological Nursing, 12(4), 174–180.
• Radesky, J. S., et al. (2020). Mobile device use and children's development. JAMA Pediatrics, 174(4), 372–377.
• Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: a meta-analytic review. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 417–453.
• Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2008). Learning disabilities. The New England Journal of Medicine, 359(20), 2056–2065.