Final Drafts Of The Research Paper ✓ Solved

```html

Final Draft and other drafts of the research paper (inclu

Final draft and other drafts of the research paper (including writing center consultation evidence) due in a two-pocket, simple folder. Preface the portfolio with a detailed reflective analysis of your research, presentation, and revision process (500 words). The portfolio should have: a) reflective analysis of the research process written in the format of a letter addressed to the reader of your research, b) a table of contents, c) final draft of the paper (clearly mention each draft no.), d) Initial, 3-4-page draft, full draft taken to the writing center, and other drafts, e) proof of writing center visit, f) anything else that you want to include to show your work for this project.

Paper For Above Instructions

The topic of privacy in the workplace has grown increasingly important as the digital age has transformed the concept of monitoring employees. In this reflective analysis, I will detail my research process, presentation development, and the revision stages I went through while constructing my paper on this subject. Through this letter addressed to you, the reader, I aim to convey the complexities and challenges involved in addressing the balance between workplace productivity and employee privacy.

During my research, I encountered a diverse body of literature discussing workplace surveillance methods and their implications for employee privacy. I began by compiling resources that highlighted current statistics on workplace monitoring, such as the information provided by DeTienne (1993), which indicated that approximately 26 million workers in the United States were being monitored. This alarming statistic set the stage for my paper and emphasized the need for discussion regarding the extent and ethics of employee surveillance.

To better understand both the employer and employee perspectives on this issue, I explored various scholarly articles, legal frameworks, and industry reports. A major focus of my research was a survey conducted by the American Management Association, which revealed that 45% of companies practiced some form of electronic surveillance (2016). This information allowed me to provide empirical evidence within my paper, enhancing its credibility and helping to frame the conversation around accepted workplace practices.

My initial draft was approximately 3-4 pages, focusing on the theoretical underpinnings of employee monitoring and its ramifications. After completing this draft, I sought assistance from the writing center. The feedback I received was invaluable; it not only highlighted areas of improvement in my arguments but also refined my writing style to ensure clarity and conciseness. This interaction underscored the importance of peer review in the revision process and helped me to recognize biases that may influence the way monitoring is perceived.

As I moved towards drafting my final paper, I made sure to include various surveillance techniques with examples from real-life situations. For instance, I documented the methods companies have adopted, ranging from computer monitoring, video surveillance, to hiring covert operatives to observe employee behavior, as discussed by Losey (1994). While such practices may grant employers insight into their employees' performance, they raise ethical questions about privacy invasion.

One engaging element I included in my paper was the notable case of K-Mart's investigative practices in the early 1990s, where employees were monitored under the guise of friendship (Mishra and Suzanne). This extreme form of surveillance exemplifies the extremes to which employers may go, raising concerns of mistrust and workplace atmosphere. The more I delved into these scenarios, the clearer it became that transparency between employers and employees is essential in fostering a fair working environment.

The discussion around privacy in the workplace is often polarized, as employees may feel that monitoring infringes on their rights while employers defend these practices as necessary for productivity and security. The legal and ethical boundaries surrounding employee surveillance are blurry, as highlighted by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA), which governs the extent and manner of monitoring permissible in both private and public sectors. This aspect of my research allowed me to explore the intersection between legal definitions and organizational behavior.

Throughout the revision process, I found it essential to critically evaluate my arguments and incorporate feedback into each successive draft. Each revision brought me closer to achieving a balanced perspective on employee privacy; I aimed not only to present the implications of surveillance but also to explore the evolving nature of employee rights in the rapid technological landscape of the workplace.

In conclusion, my reflective analysis showcases the journey I took through research, presentation, and revision phases in discussing privacy in the workplace. The ensuing drafts encapsulated a detailed examination of electronic monitoring, backed by empirical evidence and case studies to better inform the reader. I hope this paper serves as a significant contribution to the ongoing dialogue about the importance of establishing a balance between workplace monitoring and respecting employee privacy.

References

• Amick, B. C., & Smith, M. J. (1992). Stress, Computer-based Work Monitoring, and Measurement Systems: A Conceptual Overview. Applied Ergonomics.
• Danaan, S. (1990). Stories of Mistrust and Manipulation: The Electronic Monitoring of the American Workforce. Cleveland, OH: 9to5, Working Women Education Fund.
• DeTienne, K. B. (1993). Big brother or friendly coach? The Futurist.
• Fact Sheet 7: Workplace Privacy and Employee Monitoring. (1993). Privacy Rights Clearing House.
• Levy, M. (1994). Electronic Monitoring in the Workplace: Power through the Panopticon.
• Losey, M. R. (1994). Workplace Privacy: Issues and Implications. USA Today.
• Mautner, G. E., Anderson, N. W., Haushild, S. E., & Spears Lubersky, L. (2010). Privacy in the Workplace.
• Mishra, J. & Crampton, S. (2016). Employee Monitoring: Privacy in the Workplace? SAM Advanced Management Journal.
• Nash, J. R. (2010). Workplace Privacy: Proceedings of the New York University 58th Annual Conference on Labor.
• Pillar, C. (1993). Bosses with x-ray eyes. MacWorld.

```