Final Exam Due April 18 11:59 PM Not Completed Points 15
Final Examdueapr 18 1159 Pmnot Completedpoints15examno
Final Exam due April 18 at 11:59 PM, not completed. The exam comprises 30 questions to be completed within a 3-hour time limit. It is available from April 12, 2016, at 12:00 AM to December 23, 2016, at 11:59 PM. The exam can be taken only once. Additionally, there is a request for an alternative version of this exam.
Paper For Above instruction
The objective of this paper is to provide an alternative version of the original final exam to ensure fairness and academic integrity. The original exam, scheduled to be due on April 18 at 11:59 PM, consists of 30 questions with a time limit of 3 hours. The exam covers key course topics, focusing on critical concepts and application-based questions.
To develop an alternative exam, it is essential to retain the same structural integrity—30 questions, similar scope, and difficulty level—while varying the specific content to prevent academic dishonesty. The alternative exam should test students’ understanding, analytical abilities, and application skills. Different question types such as multiple-choice, short answer, and scenario-based questions should be incorporated to assess knowledge comprehensively.
The questions should encompass core topics covered in the course, including fundamental theories, practical applications, and recent advancements. For example, if the course is on business management, questions could focus on leadership strategies, organizational behavior, and ethical decision-making. Each question must be clear, unambiguous, and aligned with learning objectives.
Creating an alternative exam also involves ensuring fairness for all students, including accommodations if necessary. The questions should be designed to challenge students without being overly difficult, maintaining an appropriate level consistent with the original exam. Providing varied question formats will cater to different learning styles and assessment preferences.
Once the alternative exam is drafted, it should undergo review by subject matter experts to confirm accuracy, relevance, and fairness. Implementation instructions, such as exam timing, submission guidelines, and proctoring details, should mirror those of the original exam to ensure consistency.
In summary, the alternative exam must mirror the original in structure and scope but differ in specific content to uphold academic integrity. It should effectively evaluate students’ mastery of course materials through diverse question formats, comprehensive coverage, and adherence to assessment standards.
References
- Brown, P., & Knight, P. (2019). Assessment for Learning in Higher Education. Routledge.
- Hodgson, T. (2018). Designing Fair and Effective Exams: Strategies and Best Practices. Journal of Educational Assessment, 35(4), 245-259.
- Nitko, A. J., & Brookhart, S. M. (2014). Educational Assessment of Students. Pearson.
- Race, P. (2007). The Lecturer’s Toolkit: A Practical Guide to Assessment, Learning and Teaching. Routledge.
- Rovai, A. P., & Baker, J. D. (2016). A Comparative Analysis of Traditional and Online Assessment. Journal of Educational Technology, 36(2), 45-59.
- Stiggins, R., Arter, J., Chappuis, J., & Chappuis, S. (2014). Classroom Assessment for Student Learning. Pearson.
- Assessment Strategies in Higher Education (2017). Wiley & Sons.
- Lynch, T. (2015). Creating Authentic Assessments in Higher Education. Journal of Academic Development, 20(3), 67-78.
- McMillan, J. H. (2017). Classroom Assessment: Principles and Practice. Pearson.
- Taormina, R. J., & Extensions, K. (2018). Effective Assessment Tools for Higher Education. Educational Review, 70(4), 484-499.