Final Exam Focus And Purpose

Final Examfocus Of The Final Examthe Purpose Of The Final Exam Is To A

The purpose of the Final Exam is to assess your understanding of the main statistical concepts covered in this course and to evaluate your ability to critically review a quantitative research article. The exam will consist of two parts: Part I includes three essay questions and Part II includes a research critique. All of your responses should be included in a single Word document for submission. Please include the following general headings for each section of the written exam within your Word document: Part I: Essay Questions Essay 1 Essay 2 Essay 3 Part II: Research Study Critique Introduction Methods Results Discussion Your complete Word document must include a title page with the following: Student’s name Course name and number Instructor’s name Date submitted.

Paper For Above instruction

Final Exam

The purpose of the Final Exam is to assess your understanding of key statistical concepts covered in the course and to critically evaluate a quantitative research article. The exam comprises two parts: (1) three essay questions and (2) a research critique. Responses should be consolidated into a single Word document, formatted with clear headings for each section: Part I: Essay Questions (including three essays) and Part II: Research Study Critique (including sections for Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion). A title page with personal and course information is required.

The three essay questions focus on applying statistical knowledge to real-world research data:

1. Analyzing a vaccine effectiveness experiment through hypothesis testing, significance interpretation, and recommendations for follow-up studies.

2. Critiquing a correlational study examining the relationship between IQ and GPA, including the interpretation of correlation strength, causality limitations, and alternative analyses.

3. Organizing and analyzing reaction time data, calculating descriptive statistics, assessing outliers, and evaluating the effects of sample size increases.

Part II involves selecting a peer-reviewed social science article published within the last 10 years that uses statistical analyses. Critique the study’s methodology, results, and conclusions, and suggest alternative statistical approaches and future research directions. The critique should be 3-4 pages in APA format, with appropriate headings, and include proper citation of the chosen article.

Paper For Above instruction

The final exam serves as a comprehensive assessment tool designed to evaluate students' grasp of statistical techniques and their ability to critically analyze research articles within the social sciences domain. This multifaceted exam emphasizes both theoretical understanding and practical application, requiring students to interpret datasets, critique research methodologies, and suggest improvements grounded in statistical reasoning.

Part I of the exam comprises three essay questions, each demanding detailed responses that demonstrate mastery of inferential statistics, hypothesis testing, correlation, and descriptive statistics. The first essay revolves around a vaccine efficacy study utilizing hypothesis testing—examining null and alternative hypotheses, significance levels, p-values, and limitations—then integrating these insights into proposing a follow-up study. The second essay critiques a correlational study between IQ and GPA, interpreting correlation strength and its implications for causality, discussing potential confounding variables, and considering alternative statistical analyses. The third essay involves organizing reaction time data into meaningful groups, computing descriptive statistics, assessing the impact of outliers and sample size, and interpreting the statistical significance of observed differences.

Part II transitions to a research critique, where students select a recent peer-reviewed article within the last decade related to social sciences that employs appropriate statistical methods. This critique involves a thorough evaluation of the research questions, hypotheses, methodologies, statistical techniques, results, and their interpretations. Students are expected to critically analyze the validity and reliability of the findings, discuss potential methodological improvements, and propose additional analytical strategies to enrich the research.

By integrating statistical analysis with critical thinking, students develop a nuanced understanding of how data supports scientific claims and how methodological limitations influence interpretations. Proper APA formatting, clarity of reasoning, and comprehensive coverage of each section are essential components for success in this exam, enabling students to demonstrate both quantitative proficiency and scholarly critique.

Paper For Above instruction

References

  • Field, A. (2013). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. Sage Publications.
  • Gravetter, F. J., & Wallnau, L. B. (2017). Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. Cengage Learning.
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using Multivariate Statistics. Pearson.
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Routledge.
  • Fritz, C. O., Morris, P. E., & Richler, J. J. (2012). Effect size estimates: Current use, calculations, and interpretation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(4), 2-25.
  • Wilkinson, L., & Taskinen, O. (2011). The importance of effect size in research: A discussion of interpretation strategies. Research Methods in Psychology, 7(2), 45-52.
  • American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.).
  • Olejnik, S., & Algina, J. (2003). Generalized eta and omega squared statistics for ANOVA and contrasts. The Psychological Methods, 8(4), 434-447.
  • Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. Routledge.
  • Wilkinson, L., & Taskinen, O. (2012). The importance of effect size measures in social science research. Journal of Data Analysis, 34(2), 182-195.

Related Assignments