Final Paper Grading Rubric Used As A Guide For Improvement

Final Paper Grading Rubric Is Used As A Guide For Improving Your Draft

Review the paper section of the lab syllabus.

Paper For Above instruction

The provided rubric outlines the essential components for writing a comprehensive scientific report, emphasizing correct formatting, clarity, methodological detail, data presentation, and proper citations. This detailed guide aims to assist students in constructing a high-quality final paper that effectively communicates their research findings and conforms to academic standards.

First, the title page must be appropriately formatted, containing all required elements such as the title, author(s), affiliation, and date, to establish professionalism and clarity. The title itself should concisely encapsulate the major theme of the project, serving as an informative and original representation of the research.

The abstract should be a single, coherent paragraph not exceeding 250 words, summarizing the objectives, methods, key results, and conclusions comprehensively. It acts as a standalone overview for readers to quickly grasp the essence of the study.

The introduction section must consist of three paragraphs. The first paragraph provides general background information relevant to the topic, establishing context and importance, supported by citations formatted according to APA standards. The second paragraph details specific information about the enzyme tested, explicitly stating the objectives of the experiment and providing a brief overview of the methods employed. The third paragraph articulates the null and alternative hypotheses, articulating specific predictions for each plant tested, which guides the experimental approach and subsequent analysis.

In Materials and Methods, detailed procedural descriptions are necessary to enable replication. This includes clearly defining the positive control and experimental groups for each plant species, summarizing standardization results and any adjustments to protocols, and linking procedures purposefully. Proper organization with subheadings for each protocol enhances clarity, and citations must adhere to APA formatting.

The Results section requires presentation of all data through well-constructed graphs, preferably created using Microsoft Excel, with each graph providing a quantitative summary highlighting major trends. Graphs should match the sequence of protocols described in Methods, and raw data tables should be included, ordered consistently with the graphs, ensuring completeness and clarity. An appendix of raw data may follow the literature cited section.

The Discussion interprets the results within a scientific context. It should span two paragraphs, discussing how the findings support or refute the hypotheses, supported by quantitative evidence, and relating results to structural changes in peroxidase. This section also compares findings with those of previous studies, citing primary sources, and clearly states accept or rejection of hypotheses with justifications.

The Literature Cited must include all references cited in the text, formatted according to APA standards. A sufficient number of primary and tertiary sources should be used to substantiate the research and discussion sections comprehensively.

The entire paper should be written in a scientific style, characterized by clarity, conciseness, and objectivity. Chemical formulas must be accurately presented and properly formatted. The manuscript should be free of spelling and grammatical errors, with correct sentence structure, and employing active and passive voice appropriately. This disciplined writing ensures professionalism and readability, essential for scholarly communication.

References

• American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.).
• Bartholomew, M. J., & Myers, S. (2010). Writing in biology: A manual for writing in science. Bedford/St. Martin’s.
• Day, R. A. (2012). How to write and publish a scientific paper. Greenwood Publishing Group.
• Gopen, G. D., & Swan, J. A. (1990). The science of scientific writing. American Scientist, 78(6), 550-558.
• Hartley, J. (2008). Academic writing and publishing: A practical guide. Routledge.
• Pechenik, J. A. (2019). A short guide to writing about biology (8th ed.). Longman.
• Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2012). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills. University of Michigan Press.
• Silvestri, L. (2014). Scientific writing and publishing: A comprehensive guide. John Wiley & Sons.
• Day, R. A., & Gastel, B. (2012). How to write and publish a scientific paper. ABC-CLIO.
• Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association. (2020). 7th Edition. American Psychological Association.