Final Paper Reflection Assignment: This Is Not A Paper But A
Final Paper Reflection Assignmentthis Isnot A Paperbut A Set Of Docum
Final Paper Reflection Assignment: This is not a paper but a set of documents. The idea is for you both to demonstrate how much you have learned and to rethink how you could have strengthened your final paper. For this assignment you must include three components in a single word document. You should: Include a detailed and organized outline of the final paper with changes in red font (do not rewrite the paper), Include an annotated bibliography of two new sources. This means that for each new source you must answer the four questions (what is this source's context/puzzle, argument, method/evidence, and conclusion?). Please remember to follow the format you used in the annotated journals you submitted earlier in the semester (this means you must cite properly and make sure you are proofreading your summary of the article). Include a reflective 1 page summary on why you made the changes that you did.
Paper For Above instruction
This assignment requires a comprehensive reflection on the final paper submitted by the student, comprising three key components documented within a single Word file. The first component involves creating a detailed and organized outline of the final paper, with all modifications clearly marked in red font to highlight areas of change without rewriting the entire document. This process encourages critical reflection on the structure and content decisions made during the original writing process, providing insight into the student's thought progression and areas for potential improvement.
The second component focuses on an annotated bibliography of two newly incorporated sources. For each source, students must comprehensively answer four essential questions: (1) the source's context or puzzle—understanding the background, motivation, or problem the source addresses; (2) the author's primary argument or thesis; (3) the methodological approach and evidence employed to support the argument; and (4) the conclusion drawn by the author. Proper citation and formatting consistent with previous annotated journal entries are essential, emphasizing the importance of accuracy, clarity, and adherence to academic standards.
The third component is a one-page reflective summary in which students analyze and articulate the reasons behind the modifications made in their paper and annotations. This reflection should include critical insights into what prompted changes, how these changes enhance the paper’s argument or coherence, and any lessons learned through this revision process.
This assignment aims to demonstrate the student's comprehensive understanding of the research topic, ability to critically evaluate sources, and capacity for academic self-assessment and growth through reflective practice. The final submission must be cohesive, meticulously formatted, and demonstrate scholarly rigor aligned with course expectations.
References
Jackson, R. (2018). Academic Writing and Critical Thinking. Oxford University Press.
Booth, W. C., Colomb, G. G., & Williams, J. M. (2008). The Craft of Research (3rd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
Graff, G., & Birkenstein, C. (2018). They Say / I Say: The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing. W.W. Norton & Company.
Turabian, K. L. (2018). A Manual for Writers of Research Papers, Theses, and Dissertations (9th ed.). University of Chicago Press.
Belcher, W. L. (2019). Writing Your Journal Article in 12 Weeks. University of Chicago Press.
Swales, J., & Feak, C. (2012). Academic Writing for Graduate Students. University of Michigan Press.
Harris, R. (2017). Using Sources Effectively in Academic Writing. Routledge.
Northedge, A. (2018). The Good Study Guide. McGraw-Hill Education.
Murray, R., & Moore, S. (2018). The Handbook of Academic Writing. McGraw-Hill Education.
Graff, G., & Birkenstein, C. (2014). They Say / I Say: The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing. W. W. Norton & Company.