Final Paper: Section Two Of The Five Sections Of A Po 667319

Final Papersection Twoof The Five Sections Of A Political Science Res

Final Paper Section Two [Of the five sections of a political science research paper, the structure of Section Two is the most variable. The heading in Section Two will be specific to the content of the chapter, as it is related to the research topic and proposed study. However, the following elements should be included in Section Two, regardless of the subsections. Section Two is a presentation of a review of the literature. The researcher accomplishes three things during the process of developing Section Two: a) the researcher develops subject matter expertise in the topics relating to his/her research, b) the researcher identifies and substantiates a gap in the body of knowledge (your topic) that will be addressed by the study, and c) the researcher develops a conceptual framework which informs the research design.

Section Two shall contain the following content (although headings may vary): The introduction to Section Two tells the reader what the chapter is to be about, and tells the reader how the chapter will be organized. According to APA sixth edition, this section should not have a heading.

Review and Discussion of the Literature

The researcher presents and discusses key literature related to his/her topic and makes the connection between these and his/her research topic. The sections in the Review and Discussion of the Literature should demonstrate the researcher’s mastery of the literature in his/her area(s) of study. The subsections throughout Section 2 should be descriptive of the material being shared.

A synthesis of the literature should also be included. The synthesis is a purposeful organization of information that reflects the researcher’s critical thinking that supports the direction that this specific research takes. The synthesis provides the foundation for the conceptual framework which is a narrative (and visual, if desired) picture of how the literature examination and subsequent critical thinking combine to form a “whole” which represents the researcher’s intellectual approach to the study. As a result, it is clear to both the researcher and readers how the topics discussed are seen in relationship to each other from the unique perspective of the researcher, and supported by the literature. This synthesis may be presented in a variety of ways, but often is topological or chronological, or both.

Conceptual Framework and Summary of Literature Review

The researcher provides a summary of the key elements of Section Two and provides a brief transition to Section Three.

Paper For Above instruction

The second section of a political science research paper is crucial as it provides the foundation for understanding the scholarly context of the study. It involves a comprehensive review of existing literature, identification of research gaps, and the development of a conceptual framework that guides the entire research process. This section allows the researcher to demonstrate expertise, critically analyze prior works, and establish how their study will contribute new insights to the field.

The introductory part of Section Two sets the stage for the reader, outlining the organization and focus of the chapter without an explicit heading, in accordance with APA sixth edition guidelines. Within the review and discussion of the literature, the researcher systematically presents and analyzes key theories, empirical findings, and conceptual debates relevant to their research topic. The goal is to provide a thorough understanding of the current state of knowledge, highlighting areas of agreement, controversy, and gaps that warrant further investigation.

A critical component is the synthesis of the literature, which involves integrating various sources to create a cohesive narrative. This synthesis reflects the researcher’s critical thinking, showing how disparate pieces of literature connect and inform the research direction. It often employs topological or chronological organization to illustrate how ideas or findings have evolved over time or how they relate thematically, offering a comprehensive picture that underpins the conceptual framework.

The conceptual framework itself emerges from this synthesis, depicting the relationships between key concepts, variables, and theories. It articulates the researcher’s scholarly perspective and provides a blueprint for data collection, analysis, and interpretation. Concluding this section, a succinct summary distills the main points discussed and smoothly transitions to the next part of the research paper, maintaining logical flow and coherence.

References

• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
• Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Sage publications.
• Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. Free Press.
• Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage publications.
• Booth, W. C., Colomb, G. G., & Williams, J. M. (2008). The craft of research. University of Chicago Press.
• Hart, C. (1998). Doing a literature review: Releasing the social science research imagination. Sage.
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2017). Research methods in education. Routledge.
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Sage.
• Schindler, P. S., & Dibb, S. (2017). Business research methods. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Wallace, M., & Wray, A. (2016). Critical reading and writing for postgraduates. Sage.