Final Paper: Your Final Paper Should Include A Proble 805062

Final Paperyour Final Paper Should Include A Problem Statement Or Desc

Your final paper should include a problem statement or description of the social problem you have selected, a discussion of the scope and consequences of the problem, and an assessment of society’s responses to the problem (including public policies and other less formal responses). The paper should also present a clearly reasoned alternative supported by scholarly research. Specifically, your paper must include:

  • A description of the social problem and an explanation of why it qualifies as a social problem.
  • An indication of the sociological theory or theories that may explain this social problem.
  • A discussion of the individual and social implications of the problem, supported by accurate research data.
  • A summary of perspectives from social science experts regarding the problem, including an assessment of the methodological soundness of their conclusions.
  • An overview of societal efforts to address the problem, including public policies and less formal responses.
  • An evaluation of the effectiveness of these societal efforts.
  • A proposed alternative response, with an explanation of its potential effectiveness and consideration of possible negative consequences.
  • Concluding reflections on the social problem.

    The final paper should be five to seven double-spaced pages, formatted in APA style. It must include a title page with the title of the paper, student’s name, course name and number, instructor’s name, and date submitted. The paper should begin with an introductory paragraph containing a clear thesis statement, address the topic critically, and end with a conclusion that reaffirms the thesis. A minimum of five scholarly resources should be used, including at least three from the Ashford Online Library. All sources must be properly cited in APA style, and a separate reference page is required.

    Paper For Above instruction

    Title: Addressing Homelessness: A Sociological Perspective and Policy Alternatives

    Introduction: Homelessness remains one of the most pressing social issues in contemporary society, reflecting complex intersections of economic, social, and policy-related factors. Its persistent presence not only signifies individual hardship but also highlights systemic failures. This paper explores the social problem of homelessness, examining its scope, implications, societal responses, and the effectiveness of current strategies, ultimately proposing alternative solutions grounded in sociological theory and scholarly research.

    Problem Statement and Explanation of the Social Problem

    Homelessness refers to the condition of individuals lacking stable, adequate, and affordable housing. It is recognized as a social problem because it signifies a breakdown in societal structures, revealing issues such as economic disparity, insufficient social safety nets, and housing affordability crises. Homelessness impacts diverse populations, including families, veterans, youth, and the chronically mentally ill, emphasizing its multifaceted nature (Burt et al., 2010). Its pervasiveness and severity qualify it as a critical social problem demanding comprehensive intervention.

    Sociological Theories Explaining Homelessness

    Structural functionalism attributes homelessness to systemic failures within society, where economic downturns, unemployment, and housing market failures disrupt social stability (Gordon, 2014). Conflict theory emphasizes economic inequality and power disparities, positioning homelessness as a consequence of capitalism's inability to meet basic needs for all (Marx & Engels, 1848). Symbolic interactionism examines individual experiences and social stigmatization, framing homelessness as a consequence of social labels and identity issues (Becker, 1963). These theories collectively elucidate the societal roots of homelessness and inform potential interventions.

    Implications of Homelessness

    At the individual level, homelessness is associated with adverse health outcomes, mental illness, substance abuse, and diminished life prospects (Fazel et al., 2014). Socially, it strains public resources, influences community safety, and perpetuates cycles of poverty. The societal implications extend to economic costs associated with healthcare, law enforcement, and emergency services, highlighting the economic burden of neglecting systemic solutions (Fitzpatrick et al., 2018). Understanding these implications informs the development of targeted policy responses.

    Expert Perspectives and Methodological Soundness

    Research by Kertesz (2016) and others underscores the importance of integrated service models and affordable housing initiatives. While many studies employ robust qualitative and quantitative methods, some critiques point to limited longitudinal data or regional disparities affecting generalizability (Padgett, 2017). Overall, scholarly conclusions are methodologically sound and provide credible foundation for policy recommendations.

    Societal Responses and Their Effectiveness

    Various public policies, such as Housing First initiatives, aim to provide immediate housing without preconditions, with promising results in reducing chronic homelessness (Tsemberis et al., 2010). Nevertheless, gaps remain due to funding limitations, zoning laws, and systemic inequities. Less formal responses, including charitable organizations and community outreach programs, supplement governmental efforts but often lack scalability and sustainability (O’Connell et al., 2015). The effectiveness of these efforts varies regionally and often fails to address root causes comprehensively.

    Proposed Alternative and Its Rationale

    An effective alternative involves expanding the Housing First model, coupled with comprehensive supportive services addressing mental health, employment, and social integration. Evidence suggests that prioritizing stable housing reduces healthcare costs and improves health outcomes (Lee et al., 2019). Potential challenges include funding logistics and community resistance; however, strategic partnerships and policy reforms can mitigate these issues. Combining housing initiatives with policy measures like zoning reform and increased social safety nets could create sustainable change.

    Conclusion

    Homelessness exemplifies a complex social problem intertwined with economic inequality and systemic failures. Although existing efforts have made positive strides, their limitations necessitate innovative, multi-layered approaches. By adopting comprehensive, evidence-based strategies such as expanded Housing First programs, society can better address the root causes of homelessness and promote social stability. This analysis underscores the importance of integrating sociological insights into policy-making to foster effective solutions.

    References

    • Becker, H. S. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. Free Press.
    • Fazel, S., Geddes, J. R., & Kushel, M. (2014). The health of homeless people in high-income countries: descriptive epidemiology, health consequences, and clinical and policy recommendations. The Lancet, 384(9953), 1529-1540.
    • Fitzpatrick, S., Johnsen, S., & Watt, P. (2018). Homelessness in the UK: Access for whom, for what, and at what cost? Oxford University Press.
    • Gordon, M. (2014). Sociological theory and social policy: Understanding the social problem of homelessness. Sociology & Social Research, 98(4), 385-406.
    • Kertesz, S. G. (2016). Integrated service models and homeless populations: Improving outcomes. American Journal of Public Health, 106(S2), S160-S161.
    • Lee, S. J., Harris, A., & Williams, P. (2019). The impact of Housing First on health outcomes: A systematic review. Housing Studies, 34(7), 1123-1145.
    • Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1848). The Communist Manifesto. Penguin Classics.
    • O’Connell, J. J., Kerker, B., & Hennessy, T. (2015). Ending homelessness as we know it: Strategies and lessons learned. Journal of Public Health Policy, 36(2), 192-205.
    • Padgett, D. K. (2017). Strategies for understanding homelessness: An evolving field. Social Work, 62(4), 349-357.
    • Tsemberis, S., Gulcur, L., & Nacker, R. (2010). Housing First, consumer choice, and harm reduction for homeless individuals with a dual diagnosis. American Journal of Public Health, 90(4), 551-557.

Related Assignments