Final Project Milestone One: Jim Aiken Instructions

2 2 Final Project Milestone One Jim Aikeninstructionsin This Mileston

In this milestone, you will complete the first in a series of reviews challenging you to wear the hat of a criminal justice practitioner and offer analysis of the situation based on case law research. Read the scenario provided and respond to the questions that follow. This assignment serves as the first milestone toward completion of your final project. The case you will address in this milestone is Section VII of the final project. To complete this assignment, review the Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric document.

Paper For Above instruction

The final project in a criminal justice program requires a comprehensive analysis of a specific case scenario, emphasizing practical application of legal principles, critical thinking, and case law research. For Milestone One, the focus is on evaluating Section VII of the case, adopting the perspective of a criminal justice practitioner, and providing an informed analysis based on relevant legal precedents.

First, it is essential to understand the context of the scenario provided. The scenario typically involves a law enforcement or criminal justice situation that raises key legal issues such as searches and seizures, Miranda rights, due process, or the admissibility of evidence. As a practitioner, analyzing these issues involves applying applicable case law to determine whether actions taken in the scenario align with constitutional rights and legal standards upheld by courts.

In preparing the Milestone One submission, the initial step is to carefully review the scenario and identify the legal questions at play. For example, if the scenario involves an illegal search, relevant case law such as Mapp v. Ohio (367 U.S. 643, 1961) becomes critical to examine. The case established the exclusionary rule, which prevents illegally obtained evidence from being used in court. Recognizing such legal precedents ensures that your analysis remains grounded in established legal principles.

Secondly, research is vital in supporting your analysis. Use reputable legal databases such as LexisNexis, Westlaw, or government websites to locate case law, statutes, and legal commentary pertinent to the issues identified. Your research should aim to clarify how courts have ruled in similar circumstances and what standards they apply. For instance, if the scenario relates to Miranda rights, reference Mapp v. Ohio or Miranda v. Arizona (384 U.S. 436, 1966), to illustrate the legal protections afforded suspects and the requirements for law enforcement to adhere to during interrogations.

After thorough research, craft your response to the questions provided. Typical questions might involve evaluating whether law enforcement's actions comply with constitutional protections, whether evidence obtained should be admissible, or what the legal implications of the scenario are for the criminal justice process. Your answers should incorporate case law references, demonstrating how legal precedents support your analysis and conclusions.

Additionally, demonstrate critical thinking by considering possible counterarguments or alternative interpretations of the law. This shows a nuanced understanding of the legal issues and enhances the depth of your analysis.

Finally, ensure your submission is well-organized, clearly written, and adheres to academic standards of citation and referencing. Use proper APA or Bluebook citation formats for all legal sources consulted. Include a reference list of all cases, statutes, and legal texts you cite.

This milestone not only develops your analytical skills but also prepares you for subsequent stages of the final project, which will require an even more detailed exploration of criminal justice issues using case law research. Remember to review the Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric to ensure your response aligns with the expectations and criteria outlined for grading.

References

  • Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966).
  • Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961).
  • Arizona v. Gant, 556 U.S. 332 (2009).
  • Illinois v. Wardlow, 528 U.S. 119 (2000).
  • Nix v. Williams, 467 U.S. 431 (1984).
  • Snuggs, J. (2019). Criminal Law and Procedure. Cambridge University Press.
  • LaFave, W. R., Israel, J. H., King, N. J., & Kerr, O. S. (2019). Criminal Procedure. West Academic Publishing.
  • Legal Information Institute. (n.d.). Supreme Court Cases. Cornell Law School. https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/home
  • U.S. Department of Justice. (2023). Criminal Justice Resources. https://www.justice.gov/criminal
  • FindLaw. (n.d.). Criminal Procedure. https://criminal.findlaw.com/criminal-procedure/

Related Assignments