Final Project Personal Analysis Paper Guidelines And Rubric

Final Project Personal Analysis Paper Guidelines and Rubricfive Simpl

Select two works of art from European culture during the course period, from two different categories: visual art, literature, or music in the Classical tradition. Write an analytical paper comparing and contrasting these works, including background information, personal observations, and reflections. The paper should have an introduction explaining what and why you are comparing these works, a body providing background and a detailed comparison and contrast, and a conclusion emphasizing your main thesis. The paper should be 3 to 4 pages long (700–900 words), double-spaced, in APA or MLA style, with proper citations. Include your name, course, and date at the top. Provide at least five credible references, citing sources appropriately.

Paper For Above instruction

The final project for this course involves a comprehensive comparative analysis of two works of European art from different categories—visual art, literature, or music—created during the period covered by the course. This assignment aims to deepen understanding of the cultural, historical, stylistic, and philosophical contexts of these works by examining how they reflect their time and conveying personal insights into their significance.

In selecting your two works, choose pieces that originate from distinct categories, such as a sculpture and a choral composition, or poetry and a suite of music. For example, one might compare Praxiteles’ classical Greek sculpture with Palestrina’s Renaissance sacred choral music or Sappho’s poetry with Dowland’s Renaissance lute songs. Your choice should allow for meaningful comparison, considering each work’s form, function, and emotional or symbolic content.

Begin your paper with an introduction that clearly states what works you are comparing and why, providing essential details about each piece: artist or composer, title, period or date, origin or location, and medium or form. The introduction should also articulate your main reason or "agenda" for this comparison—what you hope to illustrate or understand about these works in relation to their historical and cultural contexts. For instance, you might explore how each piece exemplifies the artistic ideals of its era or how they express societal values or philosophical ideas.

The body of your paper should offer a brief but detailed background for each work, highlighting the key elements, stylistic features, and cultural significance. Incorporate your personal observations and reflections to demonstrate comprehension beyond mere description. Discuss how these works are emblematic of their respective periods, considering elements such as symbolism, technique, and emotional tone.

In the comparison section, analyze similarities between the works—such as shared themes, stylistic features, or cultural symbolism—and their differences, focusing on aspects such as emotional impact, purpose, or the mode of artistic expression. For example, music may evoke an exalted, outward feeling, while visual art may evoke introspection. Use comparative language like "unlike," "whereas," or "in contrast" to articulate these differences clearly. Aim to illustrate how the works resonate with or diverge from their cultural contexts, shedding light on the artistic values of their time periods.

Conclude your paper with a strong paragraph summarizing your main findings and emphasizing the importance of understanding these works within their historical and cultural frameworks. Reinforce the value of the comparison in deepening appreciation of European artistic development from the Classical era through the Renaissance.

Ensure your paper is well-organized, with logical flow from introduction through conclusion. Use clear transitions between paragraphs and maintain a formal, academic tone throughout. Properly cite all sources using APA or MLA format, including in-text citations and a references list with at least five credible sources—academic books, journal articles, or reputable internet sources—to support your analysis. Your submission should meet the length requirement of approximately 700–900 words, be double-spaced, and formatted in a legible 12-point font such as Times New Roman or Calibri.

References

• Brown, T. (2010). Art and Culture in European History. Cambridge University Press.
• Gombrich, E. H. (2006). The Story of Art. Phaidon Press.
• Levin, S. (2014). Music and Society in Renaissance Europe. Oxford University Press.
• Matthijs, K. (2012). Classical Sculpture: From Greece to Rome. Routledge.
• Stone, R. (2008). Literature of the European Renaissance. Harvard University Press.