Final Project: Strategic Assessment Presentation

Final Project Strategic Assessment Project Powerpoint Presentation

Develop a 20-25-slide PowerPoint presentation presenting a strategic plan for an organization, including a brief history, mission, vision, organizational analysis, environmental analysis, strategic issues, and recommendations. Support your assertions with at least five scholarly journal articles and five other sources. Include a References page in Word with at least 10 sources.

Paper For Above instruction

The final project demands a comprehensive strategic assessment of an organization, presented in a professional PowerPoint format, supplemented by a detailed references document. This paper encapsulates the core elements necessary to develop and articulate an effective strategic plan that aligns with organizational goals, external environmental factors, and industry dynamics.

Introduction and Organizational Background

The opening section of the presentation should introduce the selected organization, providing a concise yet comprehensive history, alongside its mission and vision statements. A clear understanding of the organization's foundational purpose and strategic aspirations sets the context for subsequent analyses. For instance, if analyzing a technology firm, details might include its founding date, key milestones, core business areas, and strategic objectives that guide its operations (Porter, 1980; Barney, 1991).

Organizational Analysis

This crucial section involves an in-depth internal analysis, centered on identifying the organization's strengths and weaknesses. Utilizing frameworks such as value chain analysis and functional analysis, the researcher should delineate up to five prioritized strengths and five weaknesses, with specific, quantifiable data. For example, strengths could include proprietary technology or strong brand equity, whereas weaknesses might encompass operational inefficiencies or limited market reach. Visual exhibits such as tables, charts, or diagrams should support each point, bolstering the credibility and clarity of the analysis (Hamel & Prahalad, 1994; Collis & Rukstad, 2008).

Environmental Analysis

Next, the external environment's opportunities and threats are analyzed. This involves examining industry trends, competitive forces, regulatory factors, and broader economic or social changes. Prioritizing no more than five opportunities and threats, the analysis should quantify impacts—such as market growth rates, technological advancements, or new regulatory policies—and utilize exhibits to substantiate claims. Tools like PESTEL analysis and Porter's Five Forces can be employed to structure this assessment (Porter, 1980; Johnson et al., 2017).

Strategic Issues and Recommendations

The core of the strategic plan involves identifying the organization's most critical strategic issue(s). These issues should emerge logically from the SWOT analysis, noting interrelations such as how internal weaknesses may exacerbate external threats or how external opportunities may be underutilized due to internal shortcomings. Recommendations should leverage organizational strengths, address weaknesses, capitalize on opportunities, and mitigate threats. The integration of internal and external analyses is vital, emphasizing how proposed strategies align with organizational core competencies and competitive advantages (Rumelt, 2011; Christensen et al., 2014).

Conclusion and Summary

The final slides synthesize the strategic assessment's findings, reaffirming key issues and proposed strategies. A succinct summary reinforces the value of the strategic plan and its potential to guide organizational success.

Design and Presentation Tips

To ensure professionalism, slides should be detailed yet clear, with citations embedded directly within slides per APA standards. Use exhibits effectively to illustrate key points, and avoid excessive text to facilitate engaging delivery. All referenced sources must be systematically documented in the references page, supporting the strategic assertions and analysis presented (American Psychological Association, 2020).

References

  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.
  • Christensen, C. M., Raynor, M. E., & McDonald, R. (2014). The Innovator's Dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Harvard Business Review Press.
  • Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1994). Competing for the future. Harvard Business Review, 72(4), 122–128.
  • Johnson, G., Scholes, K., & Whittington, R. (2017). Exploring Corporate Strategy (11th ed.). Pearson.
  • Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive Strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Free Press.
  • Rumelt, R. P. (2011). Good strategy, bad strategy: The difference and why it matters. Crown Business.
  • Collis, D. J., & Rukstad, M. G. (2008). Can You Say What Your Strategy Is? Harvard Business Review, 86(4), 82–90.
  • Johnson, G., Scholes, K., & Whittington, R. (2017). Exploring Corporate Strategy (11th ed.). Pearson.
  • Additional relevant sources comprised of industry reports, scholarly articles, and credible online resources should be included here, totaling at least 10 references to substantiate the strategic analysis and support recommendations.

Related Assignments