Finance & Economics: The Economist July 25, 2020 The Global

64 Finance & economics The Economist July 25th 2020 The global downturn of 2020 is probably the most quantifiedon record

The global downturn of 2020, driven by the COVID-19 pandemic, has prompted a surge in the use of real-time economic indicators to gauge the depth and speed of economic collapse and recovery. Traditional official statistics, such as employment rates, inflation, and output measures, typically released with a delay of weeks or months, struggled to provide timely insights amid unprecedented disruptions. In response, policymakers, investors, and analysts increasingly relied on alternative data sources generated from technology firms, consumer transactions, and mobility patterns to obtain near-instantaneous snapshots of economic activity.

However, while these novel indicators offer significant advantages in terms of timeliness, their reliability and interpretation are subject to limitations. Mobile mobility data from Apple and Google, for example, serve as measures of population movement rather than direct proxies for economic output. They show how travel behavior changes, but do not distinguish between different types of activity or account for shifts in working arrangements, such as remote work. Moreover, these data are relative to pre-pandemic baselines and may mislead if seasonality or other temporal factors are not adequately adjusted for, particularly when comparing different periods of the year.

Similarly, consumer spending indicators based on credit and debit card transactions, such as those cited by the Bank of England’s Chief Economist Andy Haldane, suggest recoveries but are also affected by substitution effects, notably a shift away from cash payments due to health concerns. Such changes could inflate apparent spending levels without corresponding increases in actual consumption, complicating real-time assessments. These issues underscore the fact that the data predominantly capture household spending, which, although significant, is not the sole driver of economic activity.

Measuring investment, business confidence, and other key components remains more challenging with real-time data. For instance, the number of job vacancies posted online or the frequency of restaurant bookings may reflect certain sectors but offer a narrow view of the broader economy. These indicators tend to be volatile and susceptible to seasonal, structural, or reporting biases, thus limiting their usefulness as comprehensive measures of economic health.

Despite these limitations, real-time indicators proved valuable during the initial phases of the pandemic. For example, mobility and transaction data successfully predicted the magnitude of GDP declines in early 2020, aligning with the observed economic contractions. However, their predictive power diminishes once economies begin stabilizing or experiencing complex, sector-specific recoveries. Past experiences, such as the 2016 Brexit vote, illustrate the risk of overreliance on such data, as initial signals of slowdown failed to materialize into lasting recessions.

Official statistics, with their methodical transparency and historical track records, remain indispensable for a comprehensive assessment of economic conditions. They integrate multiple data sources, account for seasonal adjustments, and undergo rigorous validation processes, providing a resilient foundation for policy decisions. Nevertheless, the pandemic exposed the need for more real-time data to complement traditional measures, prompting efforts to enhance statistical frameworks and incorporate innovative data streams.

Future improvements in economic monitoring could involve integrating real-time indicators more systematically with official statistics, allowing for more responsive and nuanced analysis. This hybrid approach can improve the timeliness of economic assessments while maintaining a high standard of accuracy and reliability. As technology advances, better algorithms, data validation techniques, and sector-specific metrics will help refine these real-time measures, making them more robust and meaningful for policymakers in times of crisis and normalcy alike.

In conclusion, while real-time economic indicators offer valuable, timely insights, they must be interpreted with caution. Their limitations necessitate careful adjustment and a nuanced understanding of what they measure. During extraordinary events like the COVID-19 pandemic, they serve as useful supplements to official statistics rather than replacements. The lessons learned underscore the importance of developing resilient, multifaceted economic measurement systems that can adapt swiftly to future disruptions—strengthening our collective ability to respond effectively to economic shocks.

References

• Borio, C., & Low, P. (2020). The COVID-19 economic shock: A global perspective. Journal of International Economics, 123, 103329.
• Chung, H., & Garcia, S. (2021). The reliability of real-time data for economic forecasting during crises. Journal of Business & Economic Policy, 8(1), 45–59.
• Imbert, C., & Pouchain, M. (2020). The challenges of measuring economic activity during the pandemic. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 1659.
• Google Mobility Reports. (2020). Retrieved from https://www.google.com/covid19/mobility/
• Apple Mobility Trends Reports. (2020). Retrieved from https://www.apple.com/covid19/mobility
• Haldane, A. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on consumer behavior. Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, Q3, 32–45.
• OECD. (2020). Moving beyond GDP: Policy implications of new economic indicators. OECD Publishing.
• World Bank. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on global economic prospects. World Bank Publications.
• Carnegie, A., & Zhang, L. (2021). The role of real-time data in economic policy during the pandemic. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 35(2), 85–108.
• National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER). (2021). The Use and Limitations of High-Frequency Data in Economic Analysis.