Finance Final Exam Student

Finance Finalexamstudent

Identify and analyze mutually exclusive projects, calculate internal rate of return and net present value, understand operating cash flow, assess risk and returns, and evaluate expected stock returns based on beta and market information. Apply relevant financial formulas and theories to solve specific project evaluation and investment return questions.

Paper For Above instruction

Financial decision-making often involves evaluating multiple projects and investments to determine their viability and potential returns. This process requires an understanding of various financial concepts, including net present value (NPV), internal rate of return (IRR), operating cash flow (OCF), risk assessment, and expected stock returns based on models like the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM). This paper explores these concepts through practical problems and examples, demonstrating their application in real-world financial analysis.

Firstly, selecting between mutually exclusive projects often involves identifying the crossover point—the discount rate at which the project's NPVs are equal. For instance, when comparing two projects, the crossover point can be mathematically derived by equating their NPVs and solving for the discount rate. The project with the higher NPV at a given discount rate should be accepted, and the crossover point indicates the rate at which preferences switch. For example, one problem asks which project should be accepted at a 17% discount rate, given the crossover point calculated at approximately 16.67%. Generally, when the discount rate exceeds the crossover point, the project with the higher NPV should be selected, guiding strategic investment decisions.

Second, the Internal Rate of Return (IRR) provides a metric for project viability by indicating the discount rate at which the project's NPV equals zero. Calculating IRR involves estimating cash flows over the project's life, considering initial investments, operating cash flows, salvage values, and changes in net working capital. For example, a wine-expansion project with straight-line depreciation and salvage value yields an IRR of around 16.67%, suggesting the project returns are acceptable if this exceeds the company's required rate of return. A higher IRR generally signifies a more attractive investment opportunity.

Third, Net Present Value (NPV) calculations incorporate the discount rate to determine the present value of future cash flows, considering depreciation, salvage value, and working capital. When solving for NPV, the initial investments, operating cash flows, terminal salvage, and recovery of working capital are all factored in. For example, a project with an initial investment of $230,000, operating cash flow of $290,000 annually, and a 16% discount rate could yield an NPV of approximately $820,000, indicating a highly favorable investment.

Next, operating cash flow (OCF) measures the cash generated by ongoing business operations and is crucial for evaluating project profitability and cash availability. OCF is calculated using the formula: Operating Cash Flow = EBITDA + Depreciation – Taxes. Alternatively, it can be expressed as EBIT (Earnings Before Interest and Taxes) minus taxes plus depreciation. This calculation considers the impact of taxes and non-cash expenses, providing a clearer picture of cash available for reinvestment or distribution to shareholders.

Risk and return analysis involves quantifying the variability of returns and understanding the relationship between risk and expected returns. Calculating the standard deviation of historical returns, such as a six-year return series, can provide insight into return volatility. For instance, Felix's annual returns lead to a standard deviation of approximately 11.02%, depicting the investment's risk profile. Similarly, evaluating stock beta—measuring sensitivity to market movements—is essential for expected return estimation through the CAPM model.

Beta plays a central role in risk assessment. A risk-free security has a beta of 0, indicating no correlation with market movements, while the overall market has a beta of 1. Stocks with betas greater than 1 are more volatile than the market, whereas those less than 1 are less volatile. For example, Delta Electrical’s beta of 0.98, combined with a market risk premium of 9%, yields an expected return of approximately 13.22%, supporting investment decisions based on risk-adjusted returns.

The CAPM also estimates the expected return of a stock based on its beta, the risk-free rate, and the market return. For instance, given a stock with a beta of 1.3 and an expected return of 13.6%, the implied market return can be back-calculated, which in turn helps in assessing whether a stock is over- or undervalued relative to its risk profile.

Furthermore, portfolio diversification can reduce risk, which can be measured by the portfolio's standard deviation. Combining stocks A, B, and C in specific proportions—such as 30%, 20%, and 50%—allows calculation of overall portfolio risk, considering individual stock variances and covariances. The resulting portfolio standard deviation, approximately 8.99%, provides insight into diversification benefits.

Finally, expected returns and stock prices can be projected using models like the Expected Return Formula and dividend discount models. For example, GE’s expected rate of return, given a beta of 1.1 and the market’s expected return of 12%, is around 13.22%. Based on this, if GE’s current stock price is $35 with quarterly dividends, future stock prices can be estimated using dividend growth assumptions and expected return, assisting investors in making informed decisions.

In conclusion, these financial concepts and calculations are integral to making sound investment and project decisions. They enable firms and investors to evaluate profitability, weigh risks, and align investments with strategic objectives effectively. Mastery of these analytical tools enhances the ability to interpret market signals, forecast returns, and optimize investment portfolios in dynamic financial environments.

References

  • Brealey, R. A., Myers, S. C., & Allen, F. (2020). Principles of Corporate Finance (13th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Damodaran, A. (2011). Investment Valuation: Tools and Techniques for Determining the Value of Any Asset (2nd ed.). Wiley Finance.
  • Ross, S. A., Westerfield, R. W., & Jaffe, J. (2019). Corporate Finance (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1993). Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 33(1), 3–56.
  • Sharpe, W. F. (1964). Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium Under Conditions of Risk. The Journal of Finance, 19(3), 425–442.
  • Lintner, J. (1965). The Valuation of Risk Assets and the Selection of Risky Investments in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 47(1), 13–37.
  • Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1992). The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns. The Journal of Finance, 47(2), 427–465.
  • Brigham, E. F., & Houston, J. F. (2019). Fundamentals of Financial Management (15th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  • Damodaran, A. (2012). Investment Philosophies: Successful Investment Philosophies and the Greatest Investors Who Made Them Work. Wiley.
  • Siegel, J. J. (2014). Stocks for the Long Run (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Related Assignments