First Name Last Name Walden University Policy And Advocacy
First Name Last Namewalden Universitypolicy And Advocacy For Impr
This paper investigates the role of policy and advocacy in addressing a key population health issue, focusing on how presidential agendas influence resources, priorities, and strategies. It includes an agenda comparison grid that analyzes how different administrations have approached the issue, identifies relevant agencies, champions, and the political processes involved. The objective is to understand the nuances of policy development in population health and how advocacy efforts can shape or influence presidential priorities to promote improved health outcomes.
Paper For Above instruction
In the realm of public health, policy and advocacy are vital tools for addressing complex population health issues. This paper examines a specific health concern—mental health disparities among underserved populations—and analyzes how different presidential administrations have prioritized and managed this issue. By exploring the approaches of Presidents Trump, Obama, and Bush, we can better understand the mechanisms through which political agendas influence health policy, resource allocation, and advocacy efforts. This analysis involves a detailed agenda comparison grid, which serves as a foundation for discussing the roles of relevant agencies, champions, and the sustainability of agenda items across administrations.
The selected population health concern—mental health disparities—represents an ongoing challenge in the United States, affecting millions who lack access to adequate care. Contributing factors include socioeconomic barriers, stigma, inadequate funding, and systemic inequities that prevent vulnerable populations from receiving essential services. Addressing this concern requires understanding the political landscape, identifying key stakeholders, and fostering advocacy aligned with presidential priorities to motivate policy change and resource diversion.
Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid
| Administration | Population Health Concern | Factors Contributing to the Concern | Administrative Focus on Issue | Funding and Resources |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| President Trump | Decreased emphasis on mental health; focus on law enforcement and crisis response | Policy shifts favoring criminal justice over mental health treatment; budget constraints | Limited expansion of mental health programs; emphasis on reduction of federal spending | Budget cuts to SAMHSA; reallocating resources towards law enforcement and border security |
| President Obama | Significant focus on expanding mental health access and integration | Affordable Care Act inclusion; increased funding for community mental health services | Implementation of mental health parity laws; initiatives for deinstitutionalization | Increased allocations to SAMHSA; health insurance reforms to cover mental health |
| President Bush | Early attention to mental health, mainly via crisis intervention | Focus on emergency response and stabilization | Funding for crisis services; limited long-term programs | Allocations to mental health block grants; emphasis on crisis-only services |
Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis
Responsible Agency
The most appropriate agency to oversee efforts addressing mental health disparities is the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). This federal agency specializes in improving access to mental health care, reducing stigma, and funding community programs. It is central to implementing policies, funding initiatives, and coordinating with state and local entities to address mental health needs comprehensively.
Getting the Issue on the Presidential Agenda
For the issue of mental health disparities to reach the presidential agenda, it must align with broader policy priorities, such as healthcare reform, public safety, or social justice. Advocacy groups and professional organizations can influence this process through lobbying, public awareness campaigns, and presenting evidence-based solutions. Media attention and crises, like mass shootings or high-profile suicides, often catalyze political will, pushing mental health higher on the national agenda. Maintaining prominence requires sustained advocacy, demonstrating the economic and human costs of inaction, and framing mental health as integral to overall population health.
Agenda Maintenance and Champion
The persistence of mental health disparities on presidential agendas depends on effective champions—individuals or organizations promoting and framing the issue compellingly. Historically, advocacy coalitions involving professional associations such as the American Psychiatric Association, mental health nonprofits, and patient advocacy groups act as champions. These groups serve as entrepreneurs or sponsors, providing expertise, lobbying efforts, and public education. Under Obama, the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy and SAMHSA played crucial roles as champions, whereas under Trump, shifted priorities diminished advocacy momentum. For sustained change, dedicated champions must continually engage policymakers, highlight successful programs, and mobilize public support across administrations.
Conclusion
Addressing mental health disparities requires a strategic understanding of how presidential policies influence health priorities. Each administration’s focus, resource commitment, and advocacy climate significantly impact progress. Agencies like SAMHSA serve as pivotal entities in translating policy into action. Champions and advocates effectively keep issues alive and influence the political agenda by engaging stakeholders, framing issues compellingly, and mobilizing public opinion. Effective advocacy and political awareness are essential for securing sustained attention and resources toward reducing mental health disparities and promoting equitable population health outcomes.
References
- Costello, E. J., & Angold, A. (2007). Community mental health services in the United States. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 41(10), 886-895.
- Carliner, H., et al. (2016). Trends in mental health screening and utilization among US adults: Evidence from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2004–2014. Psychiatric Services, 67(8), 840–846.
- Galea, S., & Vlahov, D. (2002). Social determinants of health: The urban environment. Journal of Urban Health, 79(1), 1-12.
- Kansagara, D., et al. (2011). Risk prediction models for hospital readmission: A systematic review. JAMA, 306(15), 1678–1688.
- Kaiser Family Foundation. (2020). Mental health coverage under the Affordable Care Act. Retrieved from https://www.kff.org
- Insel, T. R. (2014). Mental health: A report of the Surgeon General. New England Journal of Medicine, 371(9), 832–841.
- McGinty, E. E., et al. (2019). The changing landscape of mental health funding and policy in the United States. Psychiatric Services, 70(2), 122–125.
- National Institute of Mental Health. (2023). Mental health statistics. Retrieved from https://www.nimh.nih.gov
- Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). (2022). National disparities in mental health treatment. HHS.gov.
- Woolf, S. H., et al. (2015). The health equity principle and policy framework for reducing disparities. Health Affairs, 34(8), 1309–1316.