First Part Read The Instructions Below And Answer It ✓ Solved

First Partread The In Instructions Below And Answer It With Two Full

First Partread The In Instructions Below And Answer It With Two Full

Read the in instructions below and answer it with two full paragraphs. Please cite sources from and use info for answers as much as possible from the two books below: A minimum of 150 words each question and References (questions #1 - 4) KEEP QUESTION WITH ANSWER EACH QUESTIONS NEED TO HAVE A SCHOLARY SOURCE with a Hyperlink

1. The current DSM(5) supports a dimensional approach to abnormality, whereas the previous DSM(IV-TR) supported a categorical approach. Some psychologists have suggested that a dimensional model (where behavior exists on a continuum and "abnormal" is simply an extreme form of normal behaviors) may be more accurate. Do you support the categorical or the dimensional approach? Which one do you feel is best for classifying personality disorders? Explain.

2. Choose between autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and discuss the proposed causes, symptoms, and treatments.

3. What disorders are common in later adulthood, and how can you tell the difference between the symptoms of these disorders and “normal” aging? What can we do as a society to help individuals who suffer from disorders of aging?

4. Under what conditions could someone use the insanity defense? Support your response with factual information from your textbook or additional resources.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

In contemporary psychology, the debate between categorical and dimensional models of mental disorders remains central. The DSM-5 primarily advocates for a dimensional approach, recognizing that many mental health conditions exist on a continuum with normal functioning, rather than in discrete categories. This perspective aligns with research indicating that psychiatric symptoms often exist on a spectrum, making the dimensional model potentially more accurate for diagnosis and treatment. Supporters argue that a dimensional approach allows for a more nuanced understanding of individual differences and severity levels, leading to more tailored interventions (Krueger & Markon, 2014). Conversely, the categorical approach, utilized traditionally, simplifies diagnosis by classifying disorders as present or absent, which can facilitate quicker clinical decisions and insurance reimbursements. However, it may oversimplify complex human behaviors and overlook the subtleties of comorbidity and symptom severity, especially in personality disorders where traits may overlap across different diagnoses (Krueger & Markon, 2014).

When considering personality disorders, a dimensional approach seems particularly advantageous. Personality traits tend to exist on continua, with "disorder" representing extreme ends of these trait dimensions. For example, traits such as neuroticism, extraversion, and agreeableness vary widely among individuals, and personality disorders often reflect maladaptive extremes of these traits rather than distinct categories. Implementing a dimensional framework allows clinicians to assess the severity and trait configuration, providing a more personalized treatment plan. It also reduces the stigma associated with labeling someone as having a "disorder," which can be an issue in categorical diagnoses. Empirical evidence suggests that personality pathology is best understood dimensionally because it captures the complexity and heterogeneity of human personality, ultimately leading to more effective interventions and better outcomes (Widiger & Simonsen, 2005). Support for this approach is also reflected in the emerging ICD-11 classifications, which are increasingly adopting dimensional models for personality disorder diagnosis.

References

Related Assignments