Fixed Overhead Costs - Brandon Gardner, Owner Manager

Fixed Overhead Costsbrandt Gardner The Owner Manager Of A Small Firm

Fixed Overhead Costs Brandt Gardner, the owner-manager of a small firm that manufactures feed processing equipment and round-hay bailers, is unhappy with the latest report on financial performance in the Kansas City, Missouri, plant. The company had recently installed a standard cost system in the Kansas City plant with the objective of controlling manufacturing costs. The performance report for the year ended revealed that the variances for materials, labor, and variable overhead were all within the desired ranges, but the fixed overhead spending and volume variances were both significantly unfavorable. Brandt wanted an explanation of the fixed overhead variances and a recommendation. Which do you think is more important for control of fixed overhead costs: the spending variance or the volume variance? Explain.

Paper For Above instruction

The evaluation of fixed overhead variances is crucial for understanding and controlling manufacturing costs within a production environment. Particularly in a setting where a standard cost system has been implemented, differentiating between spending and volume variances provides insights into operational efficiencies and financial management. In this analysis, the focus will be on comparing the significance of spending variance versus volume variance in controlling fixed overhead costs, and offering recommendations for managerial action based on these differences.

Understanding Fixed Overhead Variances

Fixed overhead costs are expenses that remain relatively constant regardless of production volume in the short term, such as depreciation, salaries of supervisory staff, and maintenance costs. In a standard costing system, variances in fixed overhead are usually classified into two categories: spending variance and volume (or efficiency) variance.

- Fixed Overhead Spending Variance: This variance indicates whether the actual fixed overhead costs incurred deviated from what was budgeted or expected. It reveals factors such as unexpected increases in fixed costs or savings that occurred during the period. An unfavorable spending variance suggests overspending, which could be due to inefficient use of resources, increased overhead rates, or unforeseen expenses.

- Fixed Overhead Volume Variance: This variance reflects the difference between the budgeted fixed overheads for actual production volume and the standard fixed overheads allocated based on actual units produced. It signifies whether the production volume was higher or lower than expected, affecting the allocation of fixed overheads to units of output.

Importance for Control:

The control and management of fixed overhead costs depend on understanding which variance can be influenced and controlled more effectively. Typically, fixed costs are considered less flexible in the short term because they are often committed expenses, but they can still be managed through strategic decisions.

Spending Variance: Since it directly relates to the actual amount spent versus what was planned, controlling the spending variance often involves scrutinizing supplier contracts, operational efficiencies, or administrative expenses. Managers can take immediate actions to curb unnecessary expenses if the variance is unfavorable. Therefore, spending variance provides insights into how well the company is managing its fixed costs financially.

Volume Variance: This variance reflects production planning and capacity utilization. Since fixed overhead costs are spread across units produced, a lower-than-expected volume results in a higher per-unit cost, which can erode profit margins. Conversely, higher-than-expected volume can spread fixed costs more effectively, lowering per-unit costs. While volume variances may be less directly controllable in the short term—since they depend on demand, market conditions, and production scheduling—they highlight underlying operational efficiency and capacity utilization issues.

Which Is More Important?

In the context of controlling fixed overhead costs within a manufacturing firm, the spending variance is generally more immediate and actionable for management. Control over fixed overhead spending involves scrutinizing contractual expenses, administrative costs, and other controllable expenses, which can often be adjusted or optimized relatively quickly. For instance, renegotiating vendor contracts or reducing discretionary expenses can prevent unfavorable spending variances.

On the other hand, volume variances are more reflective of broader operational factors such as market demand, production scheduling, and capacity planning. While these are critically important for long-term strategic management, they are less controllable on a short-term basis. Adjustments in production volume typically require longer lead times and strategic planning to influence.

Implications and Recommendations

Given this, management should prioritize controlling and monitoring fixed overhead spending variance to ensure that actual costs do not exceed budgets unnecessarily. This involves implementing tighter cost controls, regular expense reviews, and process improvements to reduce waste. Simultaneously, management should analyze the volume variance to understand capacity utilization and demand trends, informing strategic decisions such as capacity expansion, product diversification, or market development.

Furthermore, a comprehensive approach involves investigating both variances—not only to identify issues but also to implement corrective actions—bearing in mind that controlling fixed overhead costs requires balancing cost management with maintaining operational capacity. For example, if a high volume variance indicates under-utilized capacity, it might be worthwhile to explore ways to increase production or optimize resource utilization.

Conclusion

While both the spending and volume variances provide valuable insights into fixed overhead costs, the fixed overhead spending variance holds more immediate relevance for managerial control and cost management efforts within a manufacturing environment. Focused attention on controlling actual expenses ensures that fixed costs remain aligned with budget expectations, thereby safeguarding profitability. However, long-term operational efficiency and capacity utilization should not be neglected, and strategic management of volume variance remains essential for sustainable growth and cost competitiveness.

References

• Drury, C. (2018). Management and Cost Accounting (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Hilton, R. W., & Platt, D. E. (2019). Managerial Accounting: Creating Value in a Dynamic Business Environment (11th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Kaplan, R. S., & Atkinson, A. A. (2015). Advanced Management Accounting (3rd ed.). Pearson.
• Garrison, R. H., Noreen, E. W., & Brewer, P. C. (2018). Managerial Accounting (16th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Horngren, C. T., Sundem, G. L., Stratton, W. O., Burgstahler, D., & Schatzberg, J. (2019). Introduction to Management Accounting (16th ed.). Pearson.
• Anthony, R. N., Hawkins, D., & Merchant, K. A. (2014). Accounting: Texts and Cases. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Higgins, R. C. (2012). Analysis for Financial Management (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Shim, J. K., & Siegel, J. G. (2017). Financial Management (4th ed.). Barrons Educational Series.
• Merchant, K. A., & Van Der Stede, W. A. (2017). Management Control Systems: Performance Measurement, Evaluation and Incentives (3rd ed.). Pearson.
• Anthony, R. N., & Govindarajan, V. (2007). Management Control Systems. McGraw-Hill Education.