Follow The Directions Outlined In The Media Piece To Complet
Follow The Directions Outlined In the Media Piece To Complete This Lea
Follow the directions outlined in the media piece to complete this learning activity which is designed to provide practice using a rubric when peer reviewing a paper. Review the first draft of the person who posted his/her first draft directly below yours in the Peer Review forum. If your draft is still the last posted by Saturday, review the first draft posted. Complete the Peer Review Worksheet for the essay draft you reviewed. Please submit the completed worksheet to two places. As an attachment in a reply to your peer’s essay in the peer review forum. As a normal assignment submission.
Paper For Above instruction
The task of peer reviewing a draft is a crucial step in the academic writing process, fostering critical thinking and enhancing the writer's ability to improve their work. This activity involves carefully evaluating a peer’s essay draft using a specific rubric, which helps ensure that feedback is structured, objective, and comprehensive. The primary objective is to provide constructive feedback that guides the writer toward revising and strengthening their essay.
The instructions specify that students should review the first draft posted directly below their own in the peer review forum. If a student's own draft is the last one posted by Saturday, then they are instructed to review the first draft available. This ensures that every student has an opportunity to participate in the peer review process, regardless of the posting sequence. The reviewed draft is then assessed by completing a Peer Review Worksheet, which prompts the reviewer to evaluate various aspects of the essay, such as organization, clarity, argument strength, grammar, and adherence to assignment guidelines.
Once the review is completed, students are required to submit the filled-out Peer Review Worksheet in two ways. First, as an attachment in a reply to the peer's essay within the same peer review forum, fostering ongoing dialogue and feedback exchange. Second, as a formal submission through the assigned submission portal, ensuring that the review is officially recorded for grading purposes. This dual submission process helps maintain transparency and accountability in the peer review process.
Effective peer review requires students to approach their classmates' work thoughtfully and respectfully. They should identify strengths and suggest specific areas for improvement, rather than merely criticizing. Constructive feedback might include pointing out well-developed arguments, suggesting clearer thesis statements, highlighting grammatical errors, or recommending reorganization of ideas for better flow.
The use of a rubric is essential in this process because it provides clear evaluation criteria. Rubrics help reviewers remain objective and ensure that feedback covers all critical aspects of the writing assignment. They also assist writers by clearly illustrating what is expected at different levels of performance, guiding revisions toward meeting or exceeding those standards.
In addition to the technical and organizational aspects of the paper, peer reviewers should consider the coherence and engagement of the essay. Are the ideas logically arranged? Does the introduction effectively set up the topic? Is the conclusion compelling and well-supported? These elements contribute significantly to the overall effectiveness of the essay.
In conclusion, peer review is a collaborative learning activity that develops critical analysis skills and encourages reflection. By thoroughly evaluating a peer’s draft using a rubric and providing constructive feedback, students contribute to a learning community that values improvement and academic growth. This process not only benefits the writer but also enhances the reviewer’s understanding of good writing practices and standards.
References
Brown, P., & Duguid, P. (1998). Organizational learning and communities of practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 9(5), 493–505.
Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.
Lunt, P. (2007). The ethics of peer review: Promoting a culture of respect and constructive critique. Journal of Academic Publishing, 15(2), 123–130.
Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218.
Race, P. (2007). The lecturer's toolkit: A resource for developing inclusive teaching and learning. Routledge.
Topping, K. J. (2009). Peer assessment. Theory into Practice, 48(1), 20–27.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative assessment: Designing assessments to inform and improve student performance. Jossey-Bass.