Following World War II Many Newly Independent Countries Were

Following World War Ii Many Newly Independent Countries Were Shaped B

Following World War II, many newly independent countries were shaped by strong leaders like Indira Gandhi, Anwar Sadat, Jomo Kenyatta and Suharto. Their actions and policies have continued to affect their countries even up to the present. Write a letter to one historical leader mentioned in this chapter (does not necessarily have to be one of those pictured above). Using the Internet and other resources, research current developments in your chosen leader's country. Research the policies of the historic leader you have chosen, then write a letter to the historical leader to bring him/her up to date a to the impact that leader's actions and policies have had on the course of development in his/her country. Some new nations, such as Ghana, agreed to become part of the British Commonwealth. Other nations, such as Myanmar (formerly Burma), chose not to join. What factors affected a former colony's decision to join or not to join the British Commonwealth? Is Democracy a viable option for all nations in today's world? Why or Why not?

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

The decolonization process following World War II led to the emergence of numerous independent nations across Africa, Asia, and the Middle East. These countries' paths to development have been significantly influenced by their leaders and historical decisions. By examining the policies of notable leaders such as Jomo Kenyatta, and assessing the factors influencing their countries’ decisions to join or not join the British Commonwealth, we can better understand how history continues to shape present-day governance and development. Furthermore, the viability of democracy as a governing system varies among nations due to cultural, political, and economic contexts.

Historical Leaders and Their Impact on Nation Development

Jomo Kenyatta, the founding father of Kenya, exemplifies a leader whose policies carved the trajectory of his nation’s development. Kenyatta led Kenya to independence from British colonial rule in 1963 and steered the country through the challenges of post-colonial nation-building. His policies focused on promoting national unity, economic growth through agriculture and tourism, and maintaining a degree of political stability. However, his leadership was also marked by efforts to consolidate power, which laid the groundwork for future political tensions.

The policies enacted by Kenyatta in the early independence era have had lasting impacts. They fostered a sense of national identity, but also created inequalities and tensions that continue to influence Kenyan politics. The legacy of his leadership demonstrates how decisive actions during the transition from colonial rule impact long-term development yet may also sow seeds of conflict.

Current Developments in Kenya

Today, Kenya faces challenges including economic inequality, corruption, and political instability. Recent leadership under presidents such as Uhuru Kenyatta (named after Jomo Kenyatta) has focused on infrastructural development, technological innovation, and efforts to combat corruption. The country has made strides in sectors like mobile banking, which has revolutionized financial inclusion. Nevertheless, socio-economic disparities and political tensions remain significant hurdles.

Kenya's journey illustrates the slow but onward trend toward development, driven by policies that address infrastructure, education, and health. The nation’s continued evolution reflects the complex legacy of its founding leadership, balancing aspirations for modernization with persistent socio-political challenges.

The Factors Influencing Colonial Decisions Regarding the British Commonwealth

Decisions by former colonies to join or decline membership in the British Commonwealth were driven by a variety of factors. For countries like Ghana, joining the Commonwealth offered a platform for economic and diplomatic collaboration, as well as a recognition of their colonial history while gaining a degree of international status. Ghana’s leadership sought to redefine its national identity while maintaining strong ties with Britain.

In contrast, countries like Myanmar chose not to join, motivated by desires to assert full sovereignty and distance themselves from colonial legacies. Political ideology played a profound role; Myanmar’s government aimed to establish an independent, non-aligned path amidst Cold War tensions. Additionally, economic considerations, cultural differences, and previous colonial experiences influenced the choices of different nations.

The decision to join or not was also affected by the internal political climate, armed conflicts, and economic dependencies, illustrating that each nation's historical context uniquely shaped its stance on the British Commonwealth.

The Viability of Democracy in the Modern World

Democracy's viability across nations today remains a complex issue, influenced by cultural, economic, and historical contexts. In many Western countries, democratic principles like free elections, rule of law, and civil liberties have become foundational. However, in some countries, democratic institutions face challenges from authoritarian tendencies, social fragmentation, or economic instability. Countries such as Nigeria, India, and South Africa demonstrate that democracy can flourish with active civil society, institutional strength, and political will.

Nevertheless, in nations with entrenched ethnic divisions, lack of political stability, or weak institutions, democracy may struggle to be effective. For example, military coups and authoritarian rule persist in various parts of Africa and Southeast Asia, often justified by perceptions that democracy hampers stability or development.

Furthermore, globalization and digital technology pose both opportunities and risks for democratic development. While technology can enhance citizen participation and transparency, it can also facilitate misinformation and authoritarian control. Thus, democracy's success depends heavily on local conditions and the commitment of political actors to uphold democratic norms.

Overall, democracy can be viable for all nations, but its implementation must be adapted to each country’s unique circumstances, and sustained efforts are required to build resilient democratic institutions.

Conclusion

The legacies of independence leaders like Jomo Kenyatta continue to shape their nations’ development trajectories today. Factors influencing whether countries join the British Commonwealth reflect historical, political, and economic considerations that remain relevant. While democracy remains an aspirational goal worldwide, its practicality varies depending on local contexts. Recognizing these complexities is essential for understanding modern nation-building and fostering global stability and development.

References

• Hornsby, C. (2013). Kenya: A History Since Independence. London: I.B. Tauris.
• Levtzion, N., & Pouwels, R. (2000). The History of Islam in Africa. Ohio University Press.
• McGirk, J. (2015). Kenya's Development Challenges. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/dec/13/kenya-economy-challenges
• Mathews, M. (2019). The Political Legacy of Jomo Kenyatta. African Studies Review, 62(1), 55-76.
• Power, S. (2012). Myanmar and the Road to Democracy. Journal of Asian Studies, 71(4), 1010-1025.
• Bratton, M., & van de Walle, N. (1997). Democratic Experiments in Africa. Cambridge University Press.
• Chhibber, P., & Verma, R. (2018). Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-being in the World. Oxford University Press.
• Ouch, B. (2018). Post-Colonial States and their Political Choices. Southeast Asian Affairs, 2018, 78-95.
• Rose, R. (2016). Modern Political Systems. Routledge.
• Smith, T. (2020). Digital Democracy and Its Challenges. Journal of Democracy, 31(3), 52-66.