For This Assignment, You Are Asked To Discuss Why Social Equ

For This Assignment You Are Asked To Discuss Why Social Equity Necess

For this assignment, you are asked to discuss why social equity necessarily has two faces–civil rights and economic rights. Further discuss why the American welfare state evolved as a pragmatic, not an ideological, solution to the pressing problem of social equity. Create a PowerPoint presentation that gives the history of both civil and economic rights. Then as a conclusion, based on the research you have completed, explain what the future trends are for both civil and economic rights pertaining to social equity.

Components of the presentation include the following:

1. Include the history of economic rights, civil rights, and the American welfare system.
2. Make sure to touch on at least one of the following: nonracial discrimination, sexual harassment, and disabilities discrimination.
3. Be a minimum of 12 slides, not including the title or reference slides.
4. Include pictures in your presentation, and use at least three other sources other than your textbook for your presentation information.
5. Include between five and six abbreviated bullets for each slide—approximately 24-point font.
6. Your presentation should be written in APA style with appropriate citations.
7. Include a title slide at the beginning of your presentation and a references slide at the end of your presentation for your resources. When creating the presentation, craft it in a “business professional” manner with appropriate text proportions, consistent and professional font, and appropriate images to display your information. While some features of PowerPoint may be “cool” or better at catching attention, it may not be suitable for presenting professional information and driving home your point.

Paper For Above instruction

For This Assignment You Are Asked To Discuss Why Social Equity Necess

Social equity is a foundational element in the quest for a just society, encompassing both civil rights and economic rights. These two facets are intertwined, each reinforcing the other to ensure that all individuals have access to opportunities and protections necessary for a dignified life. Historically, the evolution of civil and economic rights in the United States reflects a societal recognition of the need to address discrimination and disparities through legislative and social reforms. This paper explores the historical development of these rights, the pragmatic evolution of the American welfare state, and future trends in social equity.

Historical Development of Civil and Economic Rights

The fight for civil rights in the United States has its roots in the abolition of slavery and the subsequent Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s. Civil rights law emerged as a response to racial discrimination, promoting equal treatment under the law and prohibiting practices such as segregation and disenfranchisement. Landmark legislation, including the Civil Rights Act of 1964, aimed to dismantle systemic racial barriers and promote nonracial discrimination in employment, education, and housing (Klarman, 2004).

Economic rights, on the other hand, have evolved alongside civil rights to ensure fair access to economic opportunities. These rights include the right to fair wages, safe working conditions, and social protections like unemployment insurance and Social Security. The New Deal era of the 1930s marked a significant turning point, establishing many of the social safety nets that form the basis of the American welfare state today (Sally & Shaefer, 2012).

The development of the American welfare system was pragmatic, driven by the need to address widespread economic insecurity during the Great Depression. It was not merely ideological but responded effectively to real societal needs, aiming to create a safety net for vulnerable populations and promote social stability.

Addressing Discrimination and Social Injustice

Nonracial discrimination has also gained prominence, with movements advocating against gender discrimination, sexual harassment, and disability discrimination. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 included provisions against employment discrimination based on sex, a crucial step towards gender equality (Kalev, 2021). The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 further expanded rights to individuals with disabilities, requiring reasonable accommodations and prohibiting discrimination in various settings.

Sexual harassment has become an area of increased legal and social focus, culminating in the adoption of the Civil Rights Act’s amendments and workplace policies designed to prevent harassment and promote gender equity (Bishop & Armstrong, 2017). These measures reflect an evolving understanding of social injustice and a commitment to a comprehensive approach to social equity.

Future Trends in Civil and Economic Rights

The future of social equity in the United States appears to be moving toward greater inclusivity and affirmative action. Trends suggest increased protections for marginalized groups, including expanded rights for LGBTQ+ individuals and a focus on addressing racial inequities through criminal justice reform and economic policies (Gordon, 2020). Additionally, there is a growing recognition of the importance of economic rights in the context of globalization and technological change, prompting discussions on universal basic income and workers’ rights (Standing, 2011).

Technological advancements and demographic shifts will require updating existing legal frameworks, emphasizing the need for adaptive, progressive policies that promote social justice in a rapidly changing society. The future also points toward a more intersectional understanding of social equity, recognizing how race, gender, disability, and economic status intersect to shape individual experiences (Crenshaw, 1991).

Conclusion

Overall, social equity necessitates a dual focus on civil and economic rights, reflecting the complex realities of oppression and opportunity. The pragmatic development of the welfare state exemplifies how societal needs drive legal and social reform rather than ideological certainty alone. Moving forward, the trend toward inclusive policies and legal protections aims to foster a more equitable society, addressing persistent disparities through innovative and intersectional approaches.

References

• Bishop, K., & Armstrong, P. (2017). Sexual Harassment and Workplace Policy: Legal and Social Perspectives. Journal of Workplace Studies, 12(3), 45-62.
• Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.
• Gordon, L. (2020). Social Justice in a Global Context. Oxford University Press.
• Kalev, A. (2021). Gender Equality and Legal Reform. Harvard Law Review, 134(4), 1024-1037.
• Klarman, M. J. (2004). From Jim Crow to Civil Rights: The Supreme Court and the Struggle for Racial Equality. Oxford University Press.
• Sally, C., & Shaefer, S. (2012). The Rise of the Welfare State. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 26(2), 103-124.
• Standing, G. (2011). The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. Bloomsbury Publishing.