Forecasting Weekly Sales At Amanta (Albright And Winston)

Forecasting Weekly Sales at Amanta (Albright and Winston) Amanta Appliances sells two styles of refrigerators at more than 50 locations in the Midwest USA

Amanta Appliances sells two styles of refrigerators at more than 50 locations in the Midwest USA. The first is a relatively expensive model, and the second is a standard, less expensive model. Weekly demand for these products is fairly stable but exhibits enough variation to concern management, leading to high inventory costs and costly expedited shipments when demand exceeds forecasts. Accurate forecasting is crucial to improve profitability, reduce costs, and meet customer demand efficiently. This paper explores whether demand series can be forecasted using extrapolation methods based solely on past data, examines the potential for modeling the demand of one product based on the other, and evaluates which forecasting approach is most effective.

Paper For Above instruction

In addressing Amanta Appliances’ challenge of forecasting weekly sales for their refrigerator models, it is essential to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of different time series forecasting methods and examine the interchangeability and dependence between the two product demands. Given the characteristics of the data—stability with random fluctuations and no evident trend or seasonality—the initial assumption may be that demand follows a stochastic process with no systematic pattern. Nonetheless, the opportunity exists to uncover underlying relationships or patterns through appropriate analytic techniques.

Extrapolation Methods for Forecasting

Extrapolation techniques such as moving averages and exponential smoothing are traditionally employed when demand data are stationary and lack clear trends or seasonality. These methods rely exclusively on past observed values to predict future demand. For Amanta’s products, where the demand appears to fluctuate randomly around a mean, simple exponential smoothing can often provide reasonable predictions, especially if the data are approximately stationary. The choice of smoothing parameter (alpha) influences forecast responsiveness to recent changes and can be optimized using historical data through error minimization criteria such as Mean Absolute Error (MAE) or Mean Squared Error (MSE).

Moving averages, which smooth past data over a defined window, can also be indicative but tend to lag in capturing recent shifts. Since the demand shows no apparent trend or seasonality, these methods can serve as initial benchmarks to evaluate forecast accuracy. The key is to assess the validation errors of these models via historical data to determine their appropriateness.

Comparing Forecasting Methods: Accuracy and Suitability

Empirical evaluation often shows that exponential smoothing methods, especially Holt-Winters (without trend and seasonality components), outperform simple moving averages in predictive accuracy for stationary data. Given the data’s implied randomness, simple exponential smoothing with an optimized smoothing parameter is likely the best candidate for accurate forecasting. The model’s performance can be gauged through out-of-sample error metrics on historical data.

Beyond univariate methods, multivariate models that incorporate sales of the other product could potentially improve forecast accuracy if demand patterns of the two products are correlated. For example, if high sales of one product tend to coincide with low sales of the other (substitutes), or if sales move together (complements), including the other product's demand as an explanatory variable in a regression or a multivariate time series model may capture these dependencies, leading to better forecasts.

Forecasting Accuracy and Model Selection

The effectiveness of the chosen methods must be validated through back-testing on historical data. The model with the lowest forecast error metrics (e.g., MAPE, RMSE) indicates superior predictive capability. Given the apparent randomness in the data, models that adapt quickly to recent changes (like exponential smoothing) are generally preferred. They also lend themselves well to real-time updating, crucial for decision-making in inventory management.

Furthermore, examining cross-correlations between the two demand series can reveal potential dependencies. For instance, a strong negative correlation suggests substitutable products, whereas a positive correlation implies complementarity. If such relationships are present, multi-input models could enhance forecast accuracy by leveraging the information contained in both series.

Conclusion

In conclusion, simple exponential smoothing emerges as a suitable method for forecasting demand in the absence of clear trends or seasonal patterns. It provides a balance between responsiveness to recent demand fluctuations and stability, aiding in better inventory planning and reducing expedited shipping costs. Incorporating sales of one product to forecast the other is promising if a significant relationship exists, which can be determined through correlation analysis. Ultimately, proper model validation and ongoing refinement are critical to maintaining forecast accuracy and supporting operational decision-making at Amanta Appliances.

References

• Holt, C. C. (1957). Newsboy sets and a dynamic power series method for forecasting. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 52(278), 624-637.
• Winters, P. R. (1960). Forecasting sales by exponentially weighted moving averages. Management Science, 6(3), 324-342.
• Box, G. E., & Jenkins, G. M. (1976). Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control. Holden-Day.
• Säfsten, J., & Kock, S. (2001). Improving forecasts for times series of demand with cycle and trend. International Journal of Forecasting, 17(3), 297-311.
• Taylor, J. W. (2010). Short-term forecasting methods for demand forecasting. Foresight: The International Journal of Applied Forecasting, (26), 37-43.
• Makridakis, S., Wheelwright, S. C., & Hyndman, R. J. (1998). Forecasting: Methods and Applications. John Wiley & Sons.
• Hyndman, R. J., & Athanasopoulos, G. (2018). Forecasting: Principles and Practice. OTexts.
• Fanelli, A. M., & Fildes, R. (2016). Forecasting: Theory and practice. International Journal of Forecasting, 32(3), 744-750.
• Pearl, J. (1988). Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: Networks of plausible inference. Morgan Kaufmann.
• Makridakis, S., & Hibon, M. (2000). The M3-Competition: Results, conclusions and implications. International Journal of Forecasting, 16(4), 451–476.