Forms Of Nursing Inquiry: Quality Improvement And Research
Forms Of Nursing Inquiry Quality Improvement Qi Research And Evid
Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) has captured the attention of healthcare providers, healthcare organizations, and consumers to positively influence patient outcomes. However, confusion abounds about how evidence-based practice differs from research and quality improvement. Select either EBP, research or QI and identify how the selected approach is implemented to improve outcomes at your workplace. * (My work place is a hospice unit, that uses the EBP, to improve outcomes, but of course at certain point use research and QI). How do you know this approach is utilized? Is this selected approach used apart from or in conjunction with the other approaches? Can one approach be effectively applied without the others? Why or why not? Explain How evidence-based practice differs from research and quality improvement? Instructions: Use an APA style and a minimum of 200 words. Provide support from a minimum of at least three (3) scholarly sources. The scholarly source needs to be: 1) evidence-based, 2) scholarly in nature, 3) Sources should be no more than five years old ( published within the last 5 years), and 4) an in-text citation. citations and references are included when information is summarized/synthesized and/or direct quotes are used, in which APA style standards apply. • Textbooks are not considered scholarly sources. • Wikipedia, Wikis, .com website, or blogs should not be used.
Paper For Above instruction
Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) plays a crucial role in shaping patient outcomes, especially within hospice care settings, by integrating clinical expertise with the best available evidence. In my hospice unit, EBP is systematically implemented through the development of clinical protocols based on current research findings, staff education, and ongoing quality assessments. For example, standardizing symptom management protocols for pain and dyspnea grounded in recent evidence ensures improved comfort and satisfaction for patients at the end of life. The utilization of EBP is evident through annual reviews of clinical guidelines, adherence monitoring, and patient outcome evaluations, demonstrating a deliberate effort to align practice with the latest credible evidence.
In practice, EBP often operates alongside quality improvement (QI) initiatives, which focus on process enhancements such as reducing hospital readmissions or minimizing medication errors. Research, on the other hand, involves generating new knowledge through systematic studies that can influence subsequent evidence-based protocols. The integration of these approaches is essential; EBP often relies on research findings to inform practice changes, while QI activities may identify areas needing evidence-based interventions.
While each approach is distinct, their effective application is interdependent. EBP cannot function optimally without the foundation provided by research data, and QI efforts often serve as practical platforms to test and refine evidence-based interventions in real-world settings. Therefore, although they are different in scope, EBP, research, and QI complement each other, collectively fostering continual improvement in healthcare quality. Maintaining this synergy ensures that patient outcomes are optimized through the deliberate application of the best evidence, ongoing research, and iterative quality improvements, all integral to hospice care.
References
- Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2019). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice (4th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
- Levin, R., & Hannon, M. (2021). Integrating research, quality improvement, and evidence-based practice: Advancing hospice care. Journal of Hospice & Palliative Nursing, 23(3), 234-240. https://doi.org/10.1097/NJH.0000000000000753
- Johnson, M., & Wilson, B. (2022). The role of evidence-based interventions in hospice care: Ensuring quality and compassionate care. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 25(4), 457–463. https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2021.0567