Fortunately, Theories Of Both Purchasing Power Parity And

Fortunately, the theories of both purchasing power parity and interest rate parity do not have any problems

Fortunately, the theories of both purchasing power parity (PPP) and interest rate parity (IRP) do not have any problems. Do you agree with this statement? In 350 words, defend your position. Writing should be a minimum of 350 words. This writing should contain academic references and be thoroughly researched.

Please adhere the writing rubric. Please let me know if you any questions.

Assignment Instructions 2_6b · Differentiate between the software concepts of operating systems, application programs, utility programs, and programming languages. Essay should be a minimum of 500 words. This essay should contain academic references and be thoroughly researched.

Please adhere the writing rubric. Please let me know if you any questions.

Paper For Above instruction

The assertion that the theories of purchasing power parity (PPP) and interest rate parity (IRP) are entirely devoid of problems is a contentious statement that warrants thorough examination. While both theories fundamentally provide crucial insights into exchange rate behaviors and international finance, they are not without limitations. This paper defends a balanced perspective, acknowledging their theoretical strengths and practical shortcomings, and emphasizes the importance of understanding both their economic implications and empirical challenges.

Understanding Purchasing Power Parity and Interest Rate Parity

Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) is a theory suggesting that in the long run, exchange rates should adjust to equalize the price of identical goods and services across different countries. It posits that disparities in price levels will be offset by shifts in exchange rates over time (Rogoff, 1996). Two main forms exist: absolute PPP and relative PPP. Absolute PPP assumes that the exchange rate directly reflects the ratio of price levels, while relative PPP considers inflation differentials as the driving force behind changes in exchange rates (Cuddington & Sargent, 1988).

Interest Rate Parity (IRP), on the other hand, relates to the equilibrium condition where the interest rate differential between two countries is equal to the differential between the forward and spot exchange rates. It ensures no arbitrage opportunities exist for investors engaging in covered interest arbitrage (Shapiro, 2006). The theory comprises Covered Interest Rate Parity (CIRP) and Uncovered Interest Rate Parity (UIRP), with the latter dependent on expectations about future spot rates.

Limitations and Empirical Challenges

Despite their theoretical appeal, both PPP and IRP face significant empirical challenges. For PPP, market imperfections, transaction costs, and the existence of non-tradable goods distort the long-term equilibrium. Empirical studies reveal that exchange rates often deviate from PPP predictions, especially in the short term, due to market frictions and speculative activities (Froot & Rogoff, 1991). Moreover, PPP tends to hold more reliably over long horizons, but deviations are common in the short run (Frankel, 1986).

Similarly, IRP assumes perfect capital mobility, absence of transaction costs, and rational expectations, which rarely hold in practice. Factors such as political risk, differential tax regimes, and interest rate controls introduce deviations from IRP predictions (Mishkin, 2015). Empirical tests show that while IRP is a useful benchmark, actual exchange rate movements often diverge due to these frictions and market imperfections.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while the theories of PPP and IRP are foundational and offer valuable frameworks for understanding exchange rate dynamics, claiming they are free from problems is an overstatement. Both theories provide necessary conditions but are often violated in real-world markets. Recognizing their limitations is vital for researchers and practitioners, emphasizing the need for modified models that incorporate market imperfections and behavioral factors. Thus, the statement that these theories are problem-free is inaccurate; instead, they should be viewed as idealized models that guide understanding amid complex market realities.

References

• Cuddington, J. T., & Sargent, T. J. (1988). Testing for Purchasing Power Parity under Price and Exchange Rate Nonstationarity. Review of Economics and Statistics, 70(2), 231-238.
• Froot, K. A., & Rogoff, K. (1991). Exchange Rate Volatility and Foreign Exchange Intervention: Going Back to Basics. American Economic Review, 81(2), 198-202.
• Frankel, J. A. (1986). International Capital Mobility and Relative Prices: The Law of One Price has Accepted the Wrong Hypothesis. Journal of International Economics, 21(3-4), 281-308.
• Mishkin, F. S. (2015). The Economics of Money, Banking, and Financial Markets. Pearson.
• Rogoff, K. (1996). The Purchasing Power Parity Puzzle. Journal of Economic Literature, 34(2), 647-668.
• Shapiro, A. C. (2006). Multinational Financial Management. Wiley.