Four Models For Proposal Development

Four models for proposal development The four models of proposal development are individual, consultative, cooperative, and collaborative

The four models of proposal development are individual, consultative, cooperative, and collaborative. These models offer diverse but complementary approaches to developing project ideas and grant applications (Gitlin & Lyons, 2013). The individual model involves a person working independently to develop a proposal, which is suitable for pilot projects and experienced investigators with a clear research agenda (Karsh & Fox, 2019). It is less effective for larger projects requiring diverse expertise or organizational participation, as it can lead to an isolative experience lacking intellectual stimulation.

The consultative model extends the individual approach by involving experts through assistance, hiring consultants to improve skills or expertise. This model is advantageous when external expertise enhances the proposal’s success prospects. Clear communication, open negotiations, role differentiation, and trust are vital for success. Limitations include its suitability mainly for small projects and difficulty addressing complex issues, especially for novice researchers.

The cooperative model builds upon the consultative model by inviting individuals with relevant knowledge to assist in specific project aspects. The project initiator defines roles and manages activities within the group. Another variation involves experts hired to supplement the initiator’s knowledge, benefiting both parties. The cooperative approach is effective when the investigator has some knowledge but lacks skills in certain areas, promoting shared effort and resource utilization.

The collaborative model involves developing interdependent teams with diverse skills to execute tasks and problem-solving efforts collectively. It is especially suitable for complex organizational projects, fostering knowledge sharing and multidisciplinary participation. However, it tends to be more expensive due to multiple stakeholders' salaries and frequent meetings. This model promotes an integrated effort, enhancing the likelihood of producing innovative and comprehensive outcomes, especially when securing project funding.

Conclusion and recommendation

For my proposed project, I favor employing the collaborative model, as it provides opportunities for professional development, knowledge exchange, and tackling complex organizational challenges. It effectively bridges gaps between academic research and practical application, enhancing the overall quality of the research output (Karsh & Fox, 2019). While the individual approach suits small, less complex pilot projects, larger projects benefit from the structured teamwork and resource sharing inherent in the cooperative and collaborative frameworks. Selecting the appropriate model depends on project scope, complexity, available resources, and team dynamics to ensure optimal results.

References

• Gitlin, L. N., & Lyons, K. J. (2013). Successful grant writing: Strategies for health and human service professionals. Springer Publishing Company.
• Karsh, E., & Fox, A. S. (2019). The only grant-writing book you'll ever need. Basic Books.
• Fisher, R., & Ury, W. (2011). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. Penguin Books.
• Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (1993). The wisdom of teams: Creating the high-performance organization. Harvard Business Review Press.
• Vangen, S., & Huxham, C. (2003). Nurturing collaborative relationships in organizations. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 39(1), 5-31.
• Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (2017). Joining together: Group theory and group skills. Pearson Education.
• Brass, D. J. (1984). Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(4), 518-539.
• Anantatmula, V., & Shrivastav, B. (2012). Evolution of project teams for Generation Y workforce. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 5(1), 9-26.
• Leenders, R. T. A. J., & Gabbay, S. (2016). Managing groups and teams. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Williams, P., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Research in Organizational Behavior, 20, 77-113.