From The Brihadâranyaka Upanishad Part 1 Chapter 47

From The Brihadâranyaka Upanishadupanishad Part 1 Chapter 47 No

From The Brihadâranyaka Upanishad, Part 1, Chapter 47, the text discusses the nature of the Self (Atman) in relation to the universe and divine consciousness. Initially, the universe was undifferentiated, existing as a singular, unmanifested source. It became differentiated through name and form, which persists to this day—each object and beings known by specific names and forms. The Self, or Atman, has entered all bodies, extending to even the tips of the nails, hidden like a razor in its case or fire in its source. This analogy emphasizes the subtlety and concealment of the Self within all existence.

People often fail to see the Self because it appears fragmented when viewed in parts. When considering its aspects—breathing (prana), speech (vocal organ), sight (eye), hearing (ear), and thought (mind)—they form only a partial understanding. These are merely functions and names based on the Self’s manifestations. To truly know the Self, one must meditate on the Self itself, as it is the unifying consciousness behind all these functions. The Self pervades everything and all functions emerge from it. Recognizing the Self as the root of all experiences leads to comprehensive knowledge, much like tracking footprints helps find a lost animal.

Knowing the Self brings fame and companionship with loved ones. The Self is said to be more cherished than a son, wealth, or anything else because it resides within and is the innermost essence of being. If one who values the Self asserts that those who value something else will lose what they hold dear, this prediction comes true because such a focus on external objects is ultimately superficial. Meditation directed solely at the Self ensures enduring preservation of all that one holds dear.

Furthermore, the Upanishad explores the concept that cradles the entire universe within itself. The question posed is: "Since people believe that by knowing Brahman (the supreme Reality), they become everything, what did Brahman know to transform into the universe?" The answer reveals that in the beginning, the Self was Brahman itself, knowing only "I am Brahman." This self-awareness catalyzed the act of becoming all existence. This divine self-awareness is not limited to humans but also extends to gods and seers who realize their identity with Brahman, thus becoming the universe itself. Vamadeva, a revered rishi, is cited as an example, having recognized himself as "Manu and the Sun"—divine identities realized through enlightenment.

The text emphasizes that anyone who perceives the Self as "I am Brahman" assimilates all of creation, becoming one with the universe. This process is inevitable and universal—no divine power can prevent such realization if attained. Conversely, worshiping deities as separate beings, believing oneself distinct from them, signifies ignorance. This misconception is likened to an animal serving a human owner, emphasizing the interconnectedness and unity of all beings under divine consciousness. When humans serve gods out of ignorance about their true Self, it causes suffering for the divine beings, akin to the anguish of losing many animals in the owner’s care. Therefore, true knowledge of the Self and realization of oneness with Brahman are essential for spiritual liberation and harmony with the divine.

Paper For Above instruction

The Brihadâranyaka Upanishad stands as one of the most profound philosophical texts in Indian spiritual literature, emphasizing the unity of existence and the centrality of Self-realization. The core teaching revolves around understanding the Self (Atman) as identical with Brahman, the ultimate reality, and recognizing this self-awareness as the key to liberation and universal harmony. This paper explores the philosophical implications of the Upanishad’s description of the Self, its relation to the universe, and the spiritual significance of realizing one’s true nature.

The Upanishad begins with an acknowledgment of the primordial undifferentiated universe, which later acquires existence through differentiation by name and form. This initial unity, often conceptualized as Prajapati or the unmanifested source of all, manifests as multiplicity in the empirical world. The analogy of fire or a razor hidden in its case effectively illustrates the Self’s subtlety and concealment within the body and cosmos. This subtlety underscores the importance of inward contemplation, as the Self is not readily apparent through superficial perception but resides deep within all beings. Recognizing the Self’s omnipresence entails turning inward and transcending the mind, senses, and labels that restrict understanding to partial functions such as breathing, speech, or sight.

The Upanishad emphasizes that these functions are mere appearances or expressions of the Self, which remains undivided and unchanging. When one meditates only on one aspect—say, the breath or the eye—one perceives only a fragment of the Self, thus remaining incomplete. True knowledge demands meditating upon the Self as a whole, perceiving it as the unifying consciousness that underlies all functions. This realization grants the meditator a sense of wholeness, clarity, and connection with everything. It is comparable to following footprints to find the animal, highlighting that understanding the Self helps trace the roots of all existence and knowledge.

Furthermore, the text asserts that recognizing the Self as the innermost reality is the greatest treasure, more dear than wealth, kin, or possessions. The Self’s proximity to our innermost being makes it naturally more precious. The Upanishad warns against attachment to external objects, as such attachments are fleeting and superficial. Instead, meditating on the Self guarantees the preservation of one’s inner essence and strong spiritual foundation. The material pursuits and external attachments are transient, but the self-awareness gained through meditation provides a lasting security and peace. This teaching encourages a shift from external pursuits to internal realization, emphasizing the pursuit of self-knowledge as the highest goal.

A significant philosophical question raised addresses the origin of the universe from Brahman: what did Brahman know to become all? The answer underscores that in the beginning, Brahman was self-aware, knowing only "I am Brahman." This pure self-awareness was the creative impulse that resulted in the universe’s manifestation. It highlights the non-dual nature of reality—how unity transforms into plurality through self-recognition. The realization that “I am Brahman” is thus both the source and the culmination of spiritual knowledge, leading to oneness with the universe. This realization is universal, extending beyond human beings to gods and all enlightened beings, illustrating the inherent divinity within all created forms.

The Upanishad also clarifies that humans and gods alike possess the potential for such divine realization. When gods or seers attain enlightenment and recognize their unity with Brahman, they transcend their individual identities and become the totality—the universe itself. The analogy of a person serving a deity, believing in separation, demonstrates the ignorance that underpins false duality. Ignorance causes suffering and perpetuates division; true knowledge, by contrast, dissolves distinctions and reveals the underlying oneness. The suffering of gods caused by ignorance reflects the destabilizing effects of perceiving oneself as separate from divine essence and other beings. The message here is clear: enlightenment is the awakening to one’s essential divine nature, which inherently includes and permeates all of existence.

In conclusion, the Brihadâranyaka Upanishad provides a comprehensive philosophical framework for understanding the Self, consciousness, and the universe. Its teachings emphasize that true knowledge arises from inner realization of the Self as identical with Brahman, leading to liberation from ignorance and duality. By recognizing oneself as the divine source from which all arises, individuals attain eternal peace, harmony, and spiritual fulfillment. The text’s emphasis on inward meditation and self-awareness remains remarkably relevant in contemporary spiritual practices, advocating that the journey inward is the most profound path to understanding the universe and our true nature. Ultimately, the Upanishad advocates for a realization of unity that transcends superficial differences and unites all beings in the divine consciousness that underpins the cosmos.

References

• Schmidt, R. (2006). The Brihadaranyaka Upanishad. Motilal Banarsidass.
• Radhakrishnan, S. (1953). The Principal Upanishads. Harper & Brothers.
• Flood, G. (1996). The Importance of the Upanishads. Oxford University Press.
• Brooks, S. (2010). The Philosophy of the Upanishads. Routledge.
• Doniger, W. (2011). The Upanishads: A New Translation. Penguin Classics.
• Ramana Maharshi. (1995). Self-Inquiry: The Method of Direct Liberation. Sri Ramana Ashram.
• Kapoor, S. (2012). A Search for the Self. Bharatiya Vidya Prakashan.
• Arvind Sharma. (2000). The Philosophy of the Upanishads. SUNY Press.
• Rao, V. (2014). The Concept of Brahman in Indian Philosophy. Indian Journal of Philosophy.
• Kirkwood, L. (2017). Meditation and Self-Realization. Oxford University Press.