From The Goldsmith Carter Textbook Select Either The Avon Pr

From The Goldsmith Carter Textbook Select Either The Avon Products

From the Goldsmith & Carter textbook, select either the Avon Products (Chapter 1) or GE Money Americas (Chapter 6) case study for this assignment. Write a five (5) page paper in which you: Provide a brief description of the status of the company that led to its determination that a change was necessary. Identify the model for change theory typified in the case study of your choice. Discuss what led you to identify the model that you did. Illustrate the types of evaluation information that were collected and how they are used to benefit the company. Speculate about the success of the changes within the next five (5) years and how adjustments could be made if the results become less than ideal. Use at least five (5) quality academic resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources. Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements: Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions. Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required page length. The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are: Explore how to identify and develop high-potential talent. Analyze behavior change theories and their impact on talent management processes. Determine the effects of leadership in the management of talent pools and the talent review process. Use technology and information resources to research issues in talent management. Write clearly and concisely about talent management using proper writing mechanics.

Paper For Above instruction

The case study selected for this analysis is Avon Products, as detailed in Chapter 1 of the Goldsmith & Carter textbook. Avon, historically a leading direct-selling beauty brand, faced significant challenges in maintaining its market position due to shifting consumer preferences, increased competition, and internal strategic misalignments. These issues prompted the company's leadership to recognize the need for substantial organizational change aimed at revitalizing the brand and improving operational efficiency. The recognition of the necessity for change was rooted in declining sales figures, a stagnating product portfolio, and increasing customer attrition, which collectively indicated that Avon’s existing business model was no longer sustainable in the evolving marketplace.

Avon’s status prior to the change initiative was characterized by a robust direct-sales network, but it was increasingly hampered by outdated marketing approaches and internal inefficiencies. The company’s leadership determined that a comprehensive transformation was essential to adapt to modern retail trends, digital engagement, and emerging consumer behaviors. This strategic impasse prompted Avon to embark on significant change initiatives focusing on digital transformation, restructuring sales strategies, and revitalizing product innovation to appeal to contemporary consumers. Thus, the company’s urgent need for change was driven by internal and external pressures demanding a shift from traditional sales channels to more integrated, technology-driven approaches.

The change management model most exemplified in Avon's case is Kotter’s 8-Step Change Model. This model’s emphasis on creating urgency, forming guiding coalitions, developing and communicating a vision, empowering broad-based action, generating short-term wins, consolidating gains, and anchoring new approaches aligns well with Avon’s comprehensive transformation efforts. The leadership’s recognition of external threats and internal weaknesses created the sense of urgency necessary to propel the change process forward. By establishing a guiding coalition composed of senior leaders and key stakeholders, Avon was able to more effectively develop a clear vision for digital integration and modernization. The phased approach of Kotter’s model was evident as the company implemented pilot initiatives, collected feedback, and progressively scaled successful innovations.

The identification of Kotter’s model was informed by the nature of Avon’s change process—large-scale, strategic, and requiring strong leadership to overcome resistance and sustain momentum. Avon’s change involved cultural shifts, technological adoption, and process improvements, all of which are central elements in Kotter’s framework. The model’s focus on communication and involvement was crucial, given Avon’s dispersed salesforce and internal resistance to change. The leadership team used the model’s principles to break down the complexity of the transformation into manageable steps, ensuring employee engagement and buy-in at multiple levels.

Evaluation data collected during Avon's change process included sales performance metrics, digital engagement analytics, customer satisfaction surveys, and internal employee feedback. These data points were instrumental in assessing the effectiveness of different initiatives, such as digital marketing campaigns and salesforce training. For example, tracking digital engagement helped measure the success of new e-commerce platforms and social media outreach, which correlated with an increase in sales conversions. Customer satisfaction surveys provided insights into product appeal and service quality, guiding ongoing adjustments. Internal feedback mechanisms revealed resistance points and areas requiring further support or communication, facilitating iterative improvements.

These evaluation metrics not only helped monitor the immediate impact of change initiatives but also informed strategic adjustments to ensure sustained growth. For instance, if digital sales did not meet targets, Avon could recalibrate its marketing strategies, enhance training programs, or modify product offerings accordingly. The real-time analysis allowed the company to remain agile, testing new approaches, learning from failures, and refining processes to optimize outcomes. This evaluative approach contributed significantly to the strategic learning curve, fostering a culture of continuous improvement and innovation.

Looking ahead, the success of Avon’s transformation over the next five years hinges on several factors, including ongoing adaptation to technological advancements, market trends, and consumer preferences. If the current initiatives continue to be refined and aligned with broader industry shifts, Avon has the potential to regain market share and strengthen brand loyalty. However, should the results falter, adjustments such as intensified digital marketing, increased personalized offerings, or enhanced training for sales representatives could be implemented. Additionally, reinforcing customer engagement through innovative channels or strategic partnerships might further stabilize and accelerate growth. Flexibility and proactive management will be crucial in navigating any potential setbacks.

In conclusion, Avon's change effort exemplifies a strategic application of Kotter’s 8-Step Change Model driven by internal and external pressures. The company’s comprehensive evaluation strategies provided vital insights for iterative improvements, fostering resilience and adaptability. While future success is contingent on continuous innovation and strategic agility, the foundation established by the recent transformation positions Avon well for a competitive resurgence in the evolving marketplace. Sustained commitment to monitoring, assessing, and adjusting strategies will be essential for realizing long-term success and embedding meaningful change within the organizational culture.

References

• Burnes, B. (2017). Managing change (7th ed.). Pearson.
• Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Harvard Business Review Press.
• Goldsmith, M., & Carter, L. (2010). Best practices in talent management. Jossey-Bass.
• Hiatt, J. (2006). ADKAR: A model for change in business, government, and our community. Prosci.
• Choi, S. L., Goh, C. F., Adam, M. B., & Tan, T. M. (2016). The impact of human resource management practices on firm performance in a highly regulated emerging market. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(9), 987-1008.
• Appelbaum, S. H., Habashy, S., Malo, J.-L., & Shafiq, H. (2012). Back to the future: revisiting Kotter's 8-step change model. Journal of Management Development, 31(8), 764-782.
• Armenakis, A. A., & Bedeian, A. G. (1999). Organizational change: A review of theory and research in the 1990s. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 13, 235-274.
• Prosci. (2020). The ADKAR Model. Prosci Research.
• Beer, M., & Nohria, N. (2000). Cracking the code of change. Harvard Business Review, 78(3), 133-141.
• Burnes, B. (2014). Strategic change and the management of change processes. Management Decision, 52(11), 2490-2504.