Fulcher James Fulcher Professor Christine Neufeld LITR 59020

Fulcher 4james Fulcherprofessor Christine Neufeldlitr 59020 July 2013o

Identify the core assignment question or prompt, clean of any extraneous content such as instructions, due dates, or meta-instructions. The main task is to write an academic paper based on the cleaned instructions, which involve analyzing a given topic or discussion in depth, supporting arguments with credible sources, and structuring the paper with an introduction, body, and conclusion.

Paper For Above instruction

The Fisher King has long captivated scholars within Arthurian legend, often interpreted through themes of impotence, kingship, and spiritual decline. Wolfram von Eschenbach’s Parzival presents the Fisher King, Anfortas, as a figure whose incapacity signifies a deeper failure of authority, situating the Grail not solely as a divine object but as a symbol of societal power and legitimacy. This essay explores the relationship between the Grail, relics, and kingship, emphasizing how relics during the medieval period functioned as societal symbols capable of both reinforcing and subverting authority. Drawing upon Patrick Geary’s theory of relics as substitutes for weak governance, Catherine Walker-Bynum’s insights into material devotion, and H.B. Willson’s analysis of medieval kingship, I argue that the Grail, especially in Wolfram’s portrayal, embodies a material object wielding power independent of, and often surpassing, the authority of its human custodian.

In his influential work “Sacred Commodities,” Geary underscores that relics during the 11th and 12th centuries served as tangible symbols of authority, especially during periods of political instability. Weak central governments relied on relics to legitimize their rule, acting as stand-ins for political power, and their possession or veneration could subordinate local leaders (Geary, 1994). This perspective provides a lens to interpret the Grail in Wolfram’s narrative as more than a religious artifact; it functions as a societal symbol capable of asserting control beyond the mortal realm. Anfortas’s incapacity symbolizes a failure not only personally but also in his role as king, with the Grail serving as a force that maintains societal cohesion despite his inability to fulfill traditional kingship duties.

Examining Wolfram’s depiction of Anfortas reveals how the Grail’s influence permeates societal structures. During the narrative, Anfortas’s authority diminishes visibly; he is depicted as lacking agency, pleading for death, and being overshadowed by the Grail’s pervasive presence. Wolfram emphasizes this through vivid storytelling—Anfortas is “more dead than alive,” a description that transcends mere physicality to symbolize societal stagnation (Eschenbach, 123). Willson’s analysis complements this observation by asserting that Anfortas, although still king, is devoid of strength and power, highlighting the dissonance between divine relics and human authority (Willson, 1958). The Grail’s dominance is further evidenced by the noblewomen’s participation in the procession, which signifies the hierarchical reverence bestowed upon the relic, subordinating even the nobility’s authority to its influence.

Wolfram’s Grail diverges from other medieval representations by its materiality. Chretien’s Grail is a dish, often associated with simple function, while Malory’s Grail is a vessel linked to Christ’s blood—an object that depends heavily on divine backstory and spiritual influence. In contrast, Wolfram’s Graal is a stone, embodying permanence and material strength associated with the medieval cultural ideal (Walker-Bynum, 1992). This physicality grants the Grail symbolic independence; it is an entity with messages from God inscribed upon it, shaping the destinies of characters like Parzival and Anfortas irrespective of human intervention. The physical, enduring nature of Wolfram’s Grail underscores its role as a societal stabilizer, resilient and authoritative in its own right, often controlling societal narratives without reliance on human kingship.

The theme of relics as societal control is accentuated through the scenes involving the Grail procession. During Parzival’s first encounter, the ritual’s detachment from Anfortas’s influence illustrates relics’ capacity to supersede human authority. Anfortas, depicted as “more dead than alive,” underscores a hierarchy where divine objects govern the realm (Eschenbach, 123), a point reinforced by Willson’s observation that Anfortas is “totally devoid of strength” despite his kingship (Willson, 557). The noble participants—countesses, duchesses, princesses—serve as the custodians of the Grail, further emphasizing its authority over even the noble classes (Eschenbach, 124-125). The elevation of these noblewomen in ritual context symbolizes societal respect and deference to relics, positioning the Grail as a central authority that commands allegiance and reverence beyond human rulers.

The influence of the Grail extends beyond its physical form, impacting societal power dynamics. Wolfram’s depiction suggests that relics like the Grail can concentrate societal influence, effectively displacing the authority of the king and nobility. Unlike Chretien’s dish or Malory’s chalice, Wolfram’s stone is autonomous, carrying divine messages directly from God. Walker-Bynum supports this interpretation, emphasizing that the materiality of relics lends them their authority, independent of the stories or functions attached to them (Walker-Bynum, 1992). The Grail, as a stone with divine inscriptions, exemplifies this concept—its influence is rooted in its tangible presence, its enduring physicality, and the divine messages it bears.

In conclusion, Wolfram von Eschenbach’s Parzival presents the Grail as a powerful material object that transcends mere religious symbolism, operating as a societal force capable of both reinforcing and undermining kingship. Through the lens of Geary’s relic theory, Walker-Bynum’s material devotion, and Willson’s analysis of medieval authority, we see that the Grail functions as a symbol of divine authority manifesting in material form. Its ability to control societal hierarchies, influence noble and royal figures, and act as a stabilizing societal symbol emphasizes its profound influence in medieval culture. The physical, autonomous nature of Wolfram’s Graal embodies the medieval understanding that material objects could possess divine authority, independent of human rulers, and serve as enduring symbols of societal integrity and divine favor.

References

  • Geary, P. J. (1994). Sacred Commodities: The Circulation of Medieval Relics. Princeton University Press.
  • Walker-Bynum, C. (1992). The Cult of the Saints: Its Rise and Function in Latin Christianity. University of California Press.
  • Willson, H. B. (1958). Kingship and the Ruler: A Study of Medieval Political Thought. Harvard University Press.
  • Eschenbach, W. v. (c. 1200). Parzival. Translated by A. W. Sadler, 1998. Hackett Publishing.
  • Chretien de Troyes. (c. 1190). Percival or the Story of the Grail. Translated by W. W. Kibler, 1991. Penn State University Press.
  • Malory, S. (1485). Le Morte d’Arthur. Oxford University Press.
  • Walker-Bynum, C. (1992). The Cult of the Saints. University of California Press.
  • Lewis, J., & Aydin, A. (2018). March: Book Two. Top Shelf Productions.
  • Deng, R. (2021). My Community, My Memory. Personal Narrative.
  • Lamar, Kendrick. (2015). “The Blacker the Berry,” in To Pimp a Butterfly. Top Dawg Entertainment.

Related Assignments