General Guidance: The Project Has 3 Parts, Each With The Sam

General Guidancethe Project Has 3 Parts Each With The Same Number Of

Provide a comprehensive database model for a mid-size health insurance company that tracks health claims, patient information, provider details, hospital locations, prescriptions, and related data. The model should identify core entities, attributes, and primary keys, and develop an initial Entity Relationship Diagram (ERD). Subsequently, incorporate supertype and subtype structures to distinguish between different visit types, and define relationships between entities with appropriate optionality and cardinality, including resolving many-to-many relationships.

Paper For Above instruction

In modern health insurance data management, designing a robust and comprehensive database system is essential for efficient tracking and management of claims, patient records, provider information, and treatment details. The scenario described presents a mid-sized health insurance company that requires an integrated data model to support various operational and analytical needs. This paper outlines the process of developing such a database, focusing first on identifying core entities, their attributes, and primary identifiers, followed by structuring the data model to accommodate different types of visits using supertype/subtype relationships, and finally establishing and detailing the relationships among entities to ensure data integrity and operational effectiveness.

Part A: Identifying Entities, Attributes, and Primary Keys

The initial stage involves understanding the critical data components and business rules derived from the scenario. Key entities necessary for this database include Patient, Provider (Doctor), Hospital, Prescription, and Office Visit. Each entity captures specific attributes that describe their real-world counterparts, with primary keys to uniquely identify each record.

Entities and Attributes

  • Patient:
    • PatientID (UID, mandatory)
    • Name (mandatory)
    • Address (optional)
    • Phone (optional)
    • Email (optional)
    • PrimaryCareDoctorID (optional, links to Provider)
    • InsuranceIDNumber (mandatory)
    • InsuranceCompanyName (mandatory)
  • Provider (Doctor):
    • DoctorID (UID, mandatory)
    • Name (mandatory)
    • Specialty (optional)
    • Phone (optional)
    • Address (optional)
    • AffiliatedHospitals (multi-valued, optional, linked to Hospital)
  • Hospital:
    • HospitalID (UID, mandatory)
    • Name (mandatory)
    • Location (mandatory: address, city, state, zip)
    • ContactNumber (optional)
  • Prescription:
    • PrescriptionID (UID, mandatory)
    • PatientID (mandatory)
    • DoctorID (mandatory)
    • DrugName (mandatory)
    • Purpose (optional)
    • SideEffects (optional)
    • DatePrescribed (mandatory)
  • OfficeVisit:
    • VisitID (UID, mandatory)
    • PatientID (mandatory)
    • DoctorID (mandatory)
    • Date (mandatory)
    • Type (discriminator for subtypes: NEW, FOLLOW_UP, ROUTINE)

This initial set of entities forms the foundation for the conceptual data model. Relationships are to be added in Part C, but for the preliminary ERD in Part A, only entities are depicted, with attributes and potential UIDs identified to ensure unique record identification. The attributes' optionality is guided by the scenario: for instance, patient contact information may be optional, but key identifiers and essential information like insurance number are mandatory.

Part B: Supertypes and Subtypes for Office Visits

Different types of visits require tracking varying information. To manage this, a supertype/subtype structure within the OfficeVisit entity is implemented. The OfficeVisit entity acts as the supertype with common attributes, while subtypes record specifics based on visit type.

  • Supertype: OfficeVisit:
    • VisitID (PK)
    • PatientID (FK)
    • DoctorID (FK)
    • Date
  • Subtypes:
    • NewIssueVisit:
      • InitialDiagnosis
    • FollowUpVisit:
      • PatientStatus
    • RoutineCheckup:
      • BloodPressure
      • Height
      • Weight
      • ConditionDiscovered

This hierarchy allows specific attributes to be captured for each visit type, facilitating detailed and organized historical data. The ERD will be modified to include the supertype and subtypes, with correct inheritance and key constraints, enabling differentiated data tracking within the same structural framework.

Part C: Establishing Relationships and Cardinalities

Once entities and specialized structures are defined, relationships among entities must be established, capturing real-world associations with proper optionality and multiplicity. Key relationships include:

  • Patient to Provider: Each patient must have one primary care doctor. This is a one-to-one mandatory relationship from Patient to Provider, with optionality indicating optional assignment.
  • Patient to OfficeVisit: A patient can have many visits, but each visit is associated with exactly one patient (1-to-many).
  • Provider to OfficeVisit: A provider can have many visits, with each visit associated with one provider (1-to-many).
  • Provider to Hospital: Many-to-many: a provider can be affiliated with multiple hospitals, and each hospital has multiple providers. This relationship is resolved via an associative entity forming a connector table.
  • Prescription to Patient and Doctor: Each prescription is issued by one doctor to one patient (many-to-one relationships from Prescription to Patient and Provider).
  • OfficeVisit to Prescription: One visit can result in multiple prescriptions, but each prescription is linked to one visit (1-to-many).

These relationships clarify how data entities interact. The ERD must visually represent these connections with proper cardinality notation and indicate optional versus mandatory links. Resolving many-to-many relationships, such as between doctors and hospitals, ensures data compliance and integrity.

Conclusion

Designing a medical database for a health insurance company demands careful planning of entities, attributes, and relationships. The development process involves creating a foundational conceptual model, extending it with specialized structures like supertype/subtypes, and ensuring the relationships accurately reflect real-world associations while supporting operational and analytical needs. With this comprehensive model, the company can efficiently manage claims, patient histories, provider details, and prescriptions, enabling data-driven decision-making and future expansion into multi-language support.

References

  • Elmasri, R., & Navathe, S. B. (2015). Fundamentals of Database Systems (7th ed.). Pearson.
  • Database Systems: A Practical Approach to Design, Implementation, and Management. Pearson.
    • International Journal of Medical Informatics, 125, 98-106. Journal of Medical Systems, 44(3), 45. ICIS 2018 Proceedings. Health Informatics Journal, 27(2), 1-15. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 21(4), 974-985. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 35(4), 820-829. Health Data Management.
  • ISO/IEC 11179 Standards for Metadata Registries (2019).

Related Assignments