Gerontology Paper: Diversity Of The Aging Experience ✓ Solved

Gerontology Paper: Diversity of the Aging Experience. This a

Gerontology Paper: Diversity of the Aging Experience. This assignment is an opportunity to research a unique aging experience. Choose a unique aging experience (e.g., a region, culture/ethnicity, underrepresented/minority group, or unique experience). Formulate specific research question(s) focusing on one of these aging issues: chronic illness/health concerns (e.g., dementia/Alzheimer’s, Type II diabetes, heart disease, HIV/AIDS); long-term care/caregiving; loneliness/social isolation; family structures or social support; retirement or activities in old age; economic challenges (e.g., poverty); issues around death, dying, and bereavement. Find at least four peer-reviewed journal articles (additional reputable sources such as government reports are allowed as supplemental sources). Write a 4–6 page research paper organized with these headings: Introduction (1–2 paragraphs: introduce topic, provide context, state research question and what reader needs to know); Findings (literature review summarizing research from each journal article that helps answer the research question; cite sources in APA); Discussion (analysis and critical thinking connecting findings; do not use first person); Conclusion (1–2 paragraphs summarizing the paper). Do not use first person narrative or personal anecdotes.

Paper For Above Instructions

Introduction

This paper examines the diversity of the aging experience within the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ+) community, focusing specifically on social isolation and access to long-term care. Older LGBTQ+ adults represent a growing population with distinct life-course experiences that shape health, social networks, and interactions with care systems (Fredriksen-Goldsen et al., 2011). Historic stigma, family estrangement, and variable legal protections can contribute to smaller support networks and heightened vulnerability to loneliness and barriers to long-term care (Meyer, 2003).

The central research question is: How do social support networks and experiences of stigma/discrimination influence loneliness and access to long-term care among older LGBTQ+ adults? This question foregrounds two connected aging issues—loneliness/social isolation and long-term care—while allowing review of health correlates and policy implications documented in peer-reviewed literature and authoritative reports.

Findings

Fredriksen-Goldsen and colleagues (2011, 2015) provide foundational population-level evidence that older LGBTQ+ adults exhibit distinct health profiles and social support patterns. Their research indicates higher prevalence of certain chronic conditions and mental health challenges among some LGBTQ+ subgroups, alongside variable strengths in chosen-family networks that can mitigate or exacerbate isolation (Fredriksen-Goldsen et al., 2015).

Meyer’s minority stress framework clarifies mechanisms linking stigma to poorer mental health and social withdrawal. Chronic exposure to prejudice and concealment demands contributes to elevated risk for depression and anxiety, which in turn heightens perceptions of loneliness and can reduce engagement with formal care systems (Meyer, 2003).

Emlet (2016) analyzed social networks and social support among older LGBTQ+ adults, finding that while many rely on friends and partners for care, these informal networks are sometimes precarious due to aging peers, smaller families of origin, and legal barriers to caregiving recognition. Emlet reports that these network compositions influence both psychological well-being and practical long-term care planning (Emlet, 2016).

Brennan-Ing et al. (2014) explored intersections of social isolation, long-term care needs, and service access, reporting that LGBTQ+ elders often anticipate and experience discrimination in care settings, leading to delayed help-seeking or concealment of identity. This avoidance can reduce utilization of home- and facility-based services and increase risk for unmet long-term care needs (Brennan-Ing et al., 2014).

National-level assessments and advocacy reports (National Academies, 2020; AARP, 2018) corroborate peer-reviewed findings and highlight systemic gaps: limited provider training, inconsistent nondiscrimination protections, and insufficient data collection on sexual orientation and gender identity in aging services. These structural factors contribute to both isolation and barriers to quality long-term care.

Discussion

Across studies, two interrelated themes emerge: (1) social network composition and (2) structural stigma. Chosen-family networks provide resilience for many older LGBTQ+ adults, offering emotional support and informal caregiving; however, these networks can be less reliable as members age simultaneously and may lack legal recognition that facilitates caregiving (Fredriksen-Goldsen et al., 2011; Emlet, 2016). Where chosen-family care is strong, loneliness is mitigated and reliance on formal long-term care may be delayed. Conversely, where relationships are strained or absent, loneliness intensifies and unmet care needs increase.

Structural stigma—manifested through discriminatory practices, inadequate provider training, and lack of policy protections—creates barriers to accessing long-term care (Meyer, 2003; National Academies, 2020). Anticipation of prejudice can lead to concealment of identity in care settings or avoidance of services altogether, exacerbating isolation and health decline (Brennan-Ing et al., 2014). Empirical work suggests that interventions reducing stigma and ensuring legal recognition of caregiving relationships can improve service uptake and well-being (Fredriksen-Goldsen et al., 2015).

Methodological strengths in this literature include population-based analyses and mixed-methods approaches that illuminate both prevalence and lived experience. Limitations include underrepresentation of transgender, bisexual, and racially/ethnically diverse older adults in some datasets and inconsistent measures of social isolation. Additionally, much research is U.S.-centric, limiting generalizability to other sociopolitical contexts (AARP, 2018).

Implications for Practice and Policy

Findings indicate that long-term care systems should adopt LGBTQ+-inclusive policies, staff training, and data collection on sexual orientation and gender identity to identify needs and monitor disparities (National Academies, 2020). Legal recognition of non-biological caregiving relationships (e.g., visitation rights, decision-making authority) would strengthen safety nets for those relying on chosen-family care (Fredriksen-Goldsen et al., 2011). Social interventions—community-based programs to reduce isolation, peer-support models, and targeted outreach—can address loneliness while building connections to formal services (Emlet, 2016).

Conclusion

Older LGBTQ+ adults experience diverse aging trajectories shaped by resilient chosen-family networks and persistent structural challenges. Social isolation and barriers to long-term care are closely linked through pathways of stigma, legal invisibility of caregiving relationships, and provider-level discrimination. Addressing these issues requires multilevel strategies: enhancing social supports, implementing inclusive policies and training, and improving data collection to inform practice and resource allocation. Future research should prioritize longitudinal, intersectional studies that include transgender, bisexual, and racially diverse older adults to better capture heterogeneity within the LGBTQ+ aging experience.

References

  • Fredriksen-Goldsen, K. I., Kim, H. J., & Emlet, C. A. (2011). The Aging and Health Report: Disparities and Resilience among Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Older Adults. Seattle, WA: University of Washington.
  • Fredriksen-Goldsen, K. I., Kim, H. J., Shiu, C., Emlet, C. A., Hoy-Ellis, C. P., & Goldsen, J. (2015). Chronic health conditions and key health indicators among lesbian, gay, and bisexual older adults. American Journal of Public Health, 105(3), e1–e8.
  • Emlet, C. A. (2016). Social networks, social support, and health among LGBT older adults. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 59(5), 399–417.
  • Meyer, I. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129(5), 674–697.
  • Brennan-Ing, M., Seidel, L., Karpiak, S. E., & Hudson, S. (2014). Social isolation and long-term care among LGBT older adults: Implications for service delivery. Journal of Homosexuality, 61(1), 1–15.
  • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2020). The Health and Well-Being of LGBTQI+ Older Adults. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  • AARP. (2018). Out & Visible: The Experiences and Attitudes of Older LGBT Americans. AARP Research.
  • Witten, T. M. (2014). Aging in the LGBTQ community: Implications for long-term care. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 26(1-2), 1–12.
  • Kimmel, D. C., Rose, T., & David, S. (2016). Long-term care experiences of LGBT older adults. Gerontologist, 56(3), 411–420.
  • World Health Organization. (2021). Ageing and health. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-and-health

Related Assignments