Global Health Comparison Grid Template Use This Docum 923328

Global Health Comparison Grid Template Use this document to complete the Module 6 Assessment

Use this document to complete the Module 6 Assessment Global Healthcare Comparison Matrix and Narrative Statement

Describe the policy in each country related to the identified healthcare issue. What are the strengths and weaknesses of this policy? Explain how the social determinants of health may impact the specified global health issue with specific examples. Discuss how each country's government has addressed cost, quality, and access to the global health issue. Describe the impact of the health policy on the health of the global population with specific examples. Analyze the potential impact of the health policy on the role of nurses in each country. Explain how global health issues influence local healthcare organizations and policies in both countries with specific examples.

Paper For Above instruction

The global health landscape is complex, influenced by diverse policies, social determinants, and healthcare systems that differ across nations. Comparing the United States and another country—say, Canada or the United Kingdom—provides valuable insights into how policies shape health outcomes and professional roles, especially for nurses. This paper explores the healthcare policies related to a specific global health issue, such as mental health or infectious disease management, comparing their strengths and weaknesses, and considering the social determinants impacting these issues in both countries.

In the United States, healthcare policy related to mental health care is primarily governed by federal and state legislation, including the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act, which mandates parity between mental health and physical health coverage. The strengths of this policy lie in its emphasis on reducing disparities and promoting equitable access to mental health services. However, its weaknesses include uneven implementation across states, insurance coverage limitations, and disparities rooted in socioeconomic status that hinder access for vulnerable populations.

In contrast, Canada's mental health policy is characterized by publicly funded healthcare services with a universal coverage approach. The strengths here include comprehensive coverage and reduced financial barriers, leading to higher overall access. Nonetheless, weaknesses are evident in the variability of service quality across provinces and shortages of mental health professionals, which affect timely access to care.

Social determinants such as poverty, education, and social isolation significantly impact mental health in both countries. For example, socioeconomic status influences access to care, treatment adherence, and recovery outcomes. In the U.S., marginalized communities often face barriers due to systemic inequalities and insurance coverage gaps. In Canada, rural and indigenous populations experience disparities owing to geographic and cultural factors.

Each country's government has addressed cost, quality, and access differently. In the U.S., initiatives like Medicaid expansion in some states have improved access for low-income populations, albeit inconsistently. Quality assurance measures include accreditation programs and federal oversight. Conversely, Canada's universal healthcare system aims to minimize costs for individuals while maintaining quality through provincial oversight and standards, though resource limitations still challenge effective service delivery.

The health policies have profoundly impacted population health—reducing stigma, expanding access, and improving outcomes where effectively implemented. For instance, the U.S. has seen increased awareness and utilization of mental health services, yet disparities persist among racial and socioeconomic groups. Canada's universal system has contributed to better overall mental health indicators but struggles with wait times and service shortages, affecting health equity.

From a nursing perspective, these policies influence nurses' roles significantly. In the U.S., nurses often serve as advocates and care coordinators, requiring advanced skills in navigating insurance and multidisciplinary teams. In Canada, nurses operate within a more integrated system, with expanded roles in community-based mental health and primary care, emphasizing prevention and early intervention.

Global health issues such as infectious disease outbreaks, chronic disease burdens, and mental health crises impact local healthcare organizations and policies profoundly. For example, during the COVID-19 pandemic, both countries had to adapt rapidly—expanding telehealth services, reallocating resources, and implementing public health measures. These responses influenced organizational policies, staffing, and resource management, underscoring the interconnectedness of global health and local healthcare systems.

In conclusion, comparing the healthcare policies of different nations reveals critical differences and similarities in addressing global health issues. The policies' strengths and weaknesses are closely tied to social determinants and resource allocation, affecting health equity, nurse roles, and overall population health. Strengthening policy frameworks and addressing disparities remain essential for improving health outcomes globally.

References

• World Health Organization. (2019). Mental health in the Americas: Regional overview. WHO Publications.
• Canadian Institute for Health Information. (2020). Health expenditure and health system indicators. CIHI.
• Gros, J., & Gray, J. R. (2018). Understanding nursing research: Building an evidence-based practice. Elsevier.
• Galea, S., & Vlahov, D. (2005). Urban health issues and the social determinants of health. Journal of Urban Health, 82(1), 1-7.
• American Psychiatric Association. (2021). Mental health policy and practice. APA Journals.
• Health Canada. (2018). Canadian mental health strategy. Government of Canada.
• Hasan, A. A., Elsayed, S., & Tumah, H. (2018). Occupational stress, coping strategies, and psychological outcomes of nurses working in psychiatric hospitals. Perspectives in psychiatric care, 54(4), 521-528.
• Lewis, J. (2018). Gender, social care and welfare state restructuring in Europe. Routledge.
• Martin, L. et al. (2020). Impact of social determinants on health disparities. Journal of Public Health Policy, 41(2), 123-134.
• Smith, P. C., & Witter, S. (2019). Health policy: A global perspective. Oxford University Press.