Global Healthcare Comparison Matrix And Narrative

Assignment Global Healthcare Comparison Matrix And Narrative Statemen

Assignment: Global Healthcare Comparison Matrix and Narrative Statement. If you talk about a possible poor health outcome, do you believe that outcome will occur? Do you believe eye contact and personal contact should be avoided? You would have a difficult time practicing as a nurse if you believed these to be true. But they are very real beliefs in some cultures. Differences in cultural beliefs, subcultures, religion, ethnic customs, dietary customs, language, and a host of other factors contribute to the complex environment that surrounds global healthcare issues.

Failure to understand and account for these differences can create a gulf between practitioners and the public they serve. In this Assignment, you will examine a global health issue and consider the approach to this issue by the United States and by one other country. To Prepare: Review the World Health Organization’s (WHO) global health agenda and select one global health issue to focus on for this Assignment. Select at least one additional country to compare to the U.S. for this Assignment. Reflect on how the global health issue you selected is approached in the U.S. and in the additional country you selected.

Review and download the Global Health Comparison Matrix provided in the Resources. The Assignment: (1- to 2-page Global Health Comparison Matrix; 1-page Plan for Social Change)

Part 1: Global Health Comparison Matrix Focusing on the country you selected and the U.S., complete the Global Health Comparison Matrix. Be sure to address the following: Consider the U.S. national/federal health policies that have been adapted for the global health issue you selected from the WHO global health agenda. Compare these policies to the additional country you selected for study. Explain the strengths and weaknesses of each policy.

Explain how the social determinants of health may impact the global health issue you selected. Be specific and provide examples. Using the WHO’s Organization’s global health agenda as well as the results of your own research, analyze how each country’s government addresses cost, quality, and access to the global health issue selected. Explain how the health policy you selected might impact the health of the global population. Be specific and provide examples.

Explain how the health policy you selected might impact the role of the nurse in each country. Explain how global health issues impact local healthcare organizations and policies in both countries. Be specific and provide examples.

Part 2: A Plan for Social Change. Reflect on the global health policy comparison and analysis you conducted in Part 1 of the Assignment and the impact that global health issues may have on the world, the U.S., your community, as well as your practice as a nurse leader. In a 1-page response, create a plan for social change that incorporates a global perspective or lens into your local practice and role as a nurse leader.

Explain how you would advocate for the incorporation of a global perspective or lens into your local practice and role as a nurse leader. Explain how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens might impact your local practice and role as a nurse leader. Explain how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens into your local practice as a nurse leader represents and contributes to social change. Be specific and provide examples.

Paper For Above instruction

The global health landscape is deeply influenced by cultural, social, and economic factors that shape health outcomes across nations. As a nurse leader and global health advocate, understanding these dynamics is crucial in designing policies and practices that promote equitable health for diverse populations. This paper explores a significant global health issue—HIV/AIDS—comparing how the United States and Brazil address it, analyzing the policies' strengths and weaknesses, and proposing a social change plan rooted in a global perspective.

The World Health Organization (WHO) emphasizes comprehensive strategies to combat HIV/AIDS, focusing on prevention, treatment, and social support. In the United States, policies such as the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program and the Affordable Care Act aim to improve access to care, funding, and education about safe practices (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2020). Conversely, Brazil has implemented its National AIDS Program, which emphasizes universal access to antiretroviral therapy (ART), widespread testing, and destigmatization efforts (Brazil Ministry of Health, 2019).

The strengths of the U.S. policies include extensive funding, advanced medical infrastructure, and targeted prevention campaigns. However, weaknesses such as disparities in access among marginalized communities highlight ongoing challenges (Kates et al., 2020). Brazil's approach demonstrates the effectiveness of universal access and community-based programs in reducing new infections and mortality rates (World Bank, 2021). Nonetheless, weaknesses include inconsistent healthcare delivery in remote areas and limited resources for ongoing education (Silva et al., 2020).

Social determinants of health—such as poverty, education level, stigma, and access to healthcare—significantly influence HIV/AIDS outcomes. In the U.S., marginalized groups such as minorities and the LGBTQ+ community often face barriers related to discrimination, impacting testing, treatment adherence, and social support (Fleming et al., 2018). In Brazil, economic inequalities and social stigma hinder efforts to control the epidemic, especially among marginalized populations (Barbosa et al., 2021). Addressing these determinants requires multi-sectoral approaches that extend beyond healthcare services.

Both countries' governments address costs, quality, and access through policies aligned with WHO agendas. The U.S. emphasizes affordable treatment through Medicaid expansion and insurance reforms, aiming to ensure high-quality care (Kates et al., 2020). Brazil's universal health system (SUS) aims to provide free access to ART and testing, promoting equity (Brazil Ministry of Health, 2019). However, resource limitations and disparities pose challenges to achieving consistent access and quality care across regions.

The health policies influence the nursing role profoundly. In the U.S., nurses are involved in patient education, advocacy, and delivery of evidence-based interventions within complex healthcare systems. They also serve as cultural mediators, addressing stigma and barriers faced by marginalized populations (Fleming et al., 2018). In Brazil, nurses often serve as community health agents, providing outreach, testing, and treatment in underserved areas (Barbosa et al., 2021). Both roles are vital in implementing policies and ensuring equitable care.

On a local level, global health issues such as HIV/AIDS impact healthcare organizations through shifts in resource allocation, training needs, and program development. For example, U.S. clinics may prioritize culturally sensitive interventions targeted at high-risk communities, while Brazilian health centers emphasize community-based testing and treatment programs. These adaptations highlight the importance of integrating global health perspectives in local practices.

Building on this analysis, a social change plan involves advocating for the integration of a global health perspective in nursing leadership. This could involve partnering with international organizations, supporting policy reforms that address social determinants, and promoting culturally competent care. As a nurse leader, fostering educational initiatives about global health issues increases awareness and prepares nurses to serve diverse populations effectively (Shields et al., 2019). Engaging in policy advocacy and community outreach further amplifies efforts to reduce health disparities and promote health equity.

Incorporating a global perspective into local nursing practice enriches understanding, enhances cultural competence, and strengthens advocacy efforts. It encourages nurses to see health as a universal human right and to recognize the interconnectedness of health issues worldwide. As a social change agent, a nurse leader can influence policies to support health equity, develop community-based programs aimed at vulnerable populations, and promote collaborations across sectors and borders—ultimately contributing to sustainable health improvements on a global scale.

References

• Brazil Ministry of Health. (2019). National AIDS Program Annual Report. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde.
• Fleming, M. F., et al. (2018). Disparities in HIV testing and treatment among marginalized populations in the United States. Journal of Public Health Policy, 39(2), 230-245.
• Kates, J., et al. (2020). U.S. health policy and HIV/AIDS: Progress and challenges. Health Affairs, 39(4), 669-677.
• Silva, R. M., et al. (2020). Challenges in HIV prevention in Brazil: A focus on resource limitations and stigma. AIDS Care, 32(3), 315-321.
• Shields, L., et al. (2019). Global health education in nursing curricula: A pathway toward health equity. International Nursing Review, 66(2), 123-129.
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2020). The Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program. Washington, DC: HHS.
• World Bank. (2021). Brazil health sector review: Universal health and HIV/AIDS. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.