Google: The Top Topic You Will Research The Organization

Google Is The Topicoverviewyou Will Research The Organization You Sele

Google is the topic Overview You will research the organization you selected in the Week 2 activity and present your analysis and identified issue. To ensure successful completion of this and the Week 4 assignment, you will need your completed Fishbone Diagram from the Week 2 activity. Instructions For this assignment, write a 1–2 page double-spaced paper in which you will: Describe the organization you selected based on the following criteria. Identify the organization you have selected. The organization should be one you are familiar with.

You have access to internal processes. It has an organizational issue that needs to be resolved. You can think of a realistic and enforceable solution to the issue. Discuss the issue you will be analyzing. Explain why the issue hinders the organization's efficiency.

Use the description and feedback from the instructor in the Week 2 Activity. Confidentiality: Since you will be addressing real issues in real organizations in your assignments, it is important to respect confidentiality. Feel free to use an alias for any company or individuals you might mention in your assignments. Remember that all discussions about these organizations should only occur within this course and not be shared with people outside the course. This course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards (SWS).

The library is your home for SWS assistance, including citations and formatting. Please refer to the Library site for all support. Check with your professor for any additional instructions. Note: Review the instructions for the Organizational Issues and Solutions assignment due in Week 4. The specific course learning outcome associated with this assignment is: Propose a solution for an organizational culture issue.

Help Resources Check out the BUS520 Library Guide. Check out this interactive tutorial: Using Your Own Words: Preventing Plagiarism. View Rubric Week 3 Assignment - Organizational Overview Week 3 Assignment - Organizational OverviewCriteria RatingsPts Describe the organization selected that meets all the stated criteria. 30 to >27 pts.Exemplary Described the organization selected that meets all the stated criteria. 27 to >24 pts.Competent Described the organization selected but the organization does not meet all the criteria. 24 to >21 pts.Needs Improvement Described the organization selected but the organization does not meet any of the stated criteria. 21 to >0 pts.Unacceptable Did not describe the organization selected and the organization does not meet all the stated criteria./ 30 pts Discuss the organizational issue you will be analyzing. 30 to >27 pts.Exemplary Discussed the organizational issue you will be analyzing. 27 to >24 pts.Competent Discussed the organizational issue you will be analyzing, but the discussion is incomplete. 24 to >21 pts.Needs Improvement Discussed the organizational issue you will be analyzing, but the discussion is incorrect. 21 to >0 pts.Unacceptable Did not discuss the organizational issue you will be analyzing./ 30 pts Explain why the issue hinders the organization's efficiency. 30 to >27 pts.Exemplary Explained why the issue hinders the organization's efficiency. 27 to >24 pts.Competent Explained why the issue hinders the organization's efficiency, but the explanation is incomplete. 24 to >21 pts.Needs Improvement Explained why the issue hinders the organization's efficiency, but the explanation is incorrect. 21 to >0 pts.Unacceptable Did not explain why the issue hinders the organization's efficiency./ 30 pts Clarity, writing mechanics, and SWS formatting requirements. 10 to >9 pts.Exemplary 0–2 errors present. 9 to >8 pts.Competent 3–4 errors present. 8 to >7 pts.Needs Improvement 5–6 errors present. 7 to >0 pts.Unacceptable More than 6 errors present./ 10 pts

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Google Inc., a global leader in technology and innovation, has revolutionized how the world interacts with information and digital services. Established in 1998 by Larry Page and Sergey Brin, Google has grown from a simple search engine into a multifaceted organization offering diverse products such as advertising services, cloud computing, hardware, and artificial intelligence. As a highly familiar organization, Google exemplifies a complex corporate structure with internal processes that support its immense scale and scope. However, despite its success, Google faces internal organizational challenges, notably related to maintaining a cohesive corporate culture amid rapid growth.

Description of the Organization

Google's core mission is to organize the world's information and make it universally accessible and useful. Headquartered in Mountain View, California, Google's operations span across continents, employing thousands of personnel worldwide. The company's internal processes revolve around innovation, software development, data management, and customer support, which are orchestrated through an intricate organizational structure comprising various departments such as engineering, product management, marketing, and human resources. This structure promotes specialization but also introduces complexities in communication and organizational cohesion.

Google's organizational culture emphasizes openness, innovation, and a collaborative environment—a philosophy encapsulated in their famously flexible workspaces and emphasis on continuous experimentation. Nevertheless, as Google has expanded, maintaining this culture and achieving organizational alignment presents significant challenges, especially in balancing innovation with formal procedures.

The Organizational Issue

The primary organizational issue facing Google is cultural cohesion and internal communication, particularly across its diversified divisions and global locations. As the company rapidly expands and acquires new subsidiaries, there is a risk of cultural dilution and misalignment. This may result in fragmented teams, inconsistent implementation of policies, and reduced overall organizational efficiency. For instance, autonomous teams operating in siloed environments sometimes pursue conflicting objectives, undermining Google's overarching strategic goals.

Moreover, the rapid pace of innovation and the need for agility sometimes conflict with the formalized processes needed for compliance and quality control. This tension creates friction in decision-making and delays project development, impeding Google's ability to respond swiftly to market changes.

Impact on Organizational Efficiency

The issues associated with cultural fragmentation and communication breakdowns directly hinder Google's organizational efficiency. When teams operate in silos, duplicated efforts often occur, and resources are not optimally allocated. The lack of a unified organizational culture hampers collaboration, reduces motivation, and diminishes cross-functional synergy. Additionally, delays in decision-making caused by bureaucratic processes can slow down product releases or strategic initiatives, reducing Google's competitive advantage.

Furthermore, misalignment in organizational goals leads to inconsistent customer experiences and internal dissatisfaction among employees, impacting overall productivity. These inefficiencies not only waste valuable resources but also threaten Google's innovative edge, which is the cornerstone of its success.

Recommendations for Resolution

Addressing these challenges requires a comprehensive approach focused on enhancing internal communication, reinforcing organizational culture, and streamlining procedures. Implementing structured cross-departmental communication platforms and regular cultural alignment workshops can foster greater cohesion. Additionally, establishing clearer channels for decision-making will mitigate delays and confusion. Emphasizing leadership development focused on cultural integration and promoting shared values across divisions can help unify the expansive organization. By fostering a more cohesive organizational culture, Google can improve internal collaboration, accelerate innovation, and sustain its global leadership position.

Conclusion

Google's formidable success is rooted in its innovative culture and technological prowess. However, internal organizational issues such as cultural fragmentation threaten to undermine this foundation. By recognizing and strategically addressing these issues through improved communication, cultural reinforcement, and procedural efficiencies, Google can enhance organizational cohesion and sustain its growth trajectory. This analysis emphasizes the importance of cultural alignment in maintaining organizational efficiency within large, dynamic companies.

References

• Barney, J. B. (2019). Organizational Culture: An Introduction. Journal of Management.
• DeLisi, R. (2020). Google’s Organizational Culture and Its Impact on Innovation. Business Review.
• Kotter, J. P. (2012). Leading Change. Harvard Business School Press.
• Schneider, B., & Barsoux, J-L. (2014). Managing Across Cultures. Pearson.
• Google. (2023). About Google. https://about.google/
• Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational Culture and Leadership. Jossey-Bass.
• Goffee, R., & Jones, G. (2013). Why Should Anyone Be Led by You? Harvard Business Review Press.
• HBR Staff. (2019). Managing Organizational Culture. Harvard Business Review.
• Johnson, P., & Scholes, K. (2017). Exploring Corporate Strategy. Pearson.
• Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (2011). Diagnosing and Changing Organizational Culture. Jossey-Bass.