Grading Rubric For Qualitative Research Critique Pape 626636

Grading Rubric For Qualitative Research Critiquepapers Should Be No Mo

Describe the grading rubric for qualitative research critique papers, including the expectations for length, content, and specific assessment criteria for problem statement/background, review of literature, discussion, and professionalism/scholarliness.

Paper For Above instruction

The provided document outlines the grading rubric for qualitative research critique papers, emphasizing a concise length of no more than two pages (plus one page for references). It stipulates detailed criteria for evaluating four main areas: the problem statement and background, review of the qualitative article, discussion, and professionalism/scholarliness. Each section has explicit expectations and benchmarks for assessment, including clarity, justification, relevance, organization, synthesis, critique, implications, and APA formatting standards.

The problem statement should be a well-justified, clear paragraph that articulates the seriousness and relevance of the problem, specifies the target population, setting, and outcomes of interest, and documents search terms and strategies appropriately. The review of the qualitative article must demonstrate clear relevance to the problem, summarize the study’s design, methods, results, and limitations, and be well-organized. The discussion should synthesize and critique the study, assess its application to clinical practice, identify gaps in knowledge, and articulate implications for nursing, public health, or health policy. The professionalism criterion emphasizes accurate APA formatting, citations, minimal language errors, and overall scholarly presentation.

This rubric guides students to produce a precise, well-structured critique that demonstrates clarity, critical thinking, and adherence to academic standards, ensuring that each critique thoroughly assesses the study’s quality and relevance while maintaining professional presentation.

References

  • Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2021). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (11th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
  • Holloway, I., & Todres, L. (2003). The status of qualitative research. Qualitative research, 3(2), 147-163.
  • Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.
  • Bradbury-Jones, C. (2007). Qualitative research and multifaceted rigor: Developing rigor in qualitative inquiry. Nurse researcher, 15(2), 42-56.
  • Sandelowski, M. (2010). What's in a name? Qualitative description revisited. Research in Nursing & Health, 33(1), 77-84.
  • Maxwell, J. A. (2012). A realist approach for qualitative research. Sage Publications.
  • Gray, D. E. (2018). Doing research in the real world. Sage Publications.
  • Silverman, D. (2016). Qualitative research. Sage Publications.
  • Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage publications.
  • Mason, J. (2002). Qualitative researching. Sage Publications.

Related Assignments