Great Migration Dr. G. J. Giddings Characteristics Human Pro

Great Migrationdr G J Giddingscharacteristicshumanpropelled Pu

Great Migrationdr G J Giddingscharacteristicshumanpropelled Pu

Identify and analyze the characteristics, causes, impact, and demographic trends of the Great Migration, especially emphasizing the role of human propulsion such as the push-pull factors, the demographics involved, the precursors that led to this migration, and the effects on urban and cultural development in the United States. Include specific figures, key figures, and geographic destinations associated with the migration, and discuss the influence of events like World War I, racial terrorism, Jim Crow laws, and economic shifts. Additionally, explore the concept of return migration and recent trends in post-industrial and service economy movements within the context of the Great Migration.

Paper For Above instruction

The Great Migration represents one of the most significant demographic shifts in American history, marked by the mass movement of African Americans from the rural Southern United States to urban centers in the North and West. This movement, driven by a confluence of push and pull factors, altered the social, cultural, and economic landscape of the United States and paved the way for burgeoning cultural renaissances and political influence among African Americans.

Characteristics of the Great Migration

The migration was characterized by its human propelled nature, primarily driven by individuals seeking better economic opportunities, safety from racial violence, and social justice. Scholars such as Dr. G. J. Giddings highlight its push-pull dynamics—push factors including economic hardships such as the Boll Weevil infestation (1915/1916), the Mississippi River floods of 1927, and widespread racial terrorism and Jim Crow laws in the South; pull factors encompassed the burgeoning industrial opportunities in northern cities like Chicago, Detroit, and New York facilitated by wartime industrial expansion during World War I. This migration was notably democratic and leaderless, involving a broad cross-section of the population.

Demographics and Predecessors

Between 1915 and 1930, approximately 1.2 million African Americans migrated North, and by 1980, this number expanded to around 6.4 million, with notable Caribbean migration including around 140,000 migrants. The demographic profile was predominantly rural, originating from impoverished Southern regions, seeking urban employment, and escaping racial violence. Key precursors included post-Reconstruction instability, violence, and a desire for the "Advantage of Living in a Free State" exemplified by figures like Benjamin 'Pap' Singleton, advocating for migration for economic freedom and safety. International precursors linked to U.S. empire expansion (Philippines, Puerto Rico, Guam, Hawaii, Cuba, Haiti, and Guyana) created ripple effects influencing migration patterns.

Impact on Urban and Cultural Development

The migration significantly transformed American cities. Detroit, Michigan, experienced a 611% population increase due to influxes of Black migrants, leading to the rise of African American institutions and organizations such as the Urban League in 1911 and the National League of Urban Conditions among Negroes. Politically, the migration empowered African Americans, exemplified by figures like Oscar DePriest, Chicago’s first Black alderman and U.S. Representative. Culturally, the Harlem Renaissance emerged, with writers like Langston Hughes and artists fostering Black artistic expression and identity.

Key Events and Figures

The migration was influenced by external events such as World War I, in which approximately 400,000 African Americans served in Europe, fostering a sense of pride and pushing for civil rights. The migration was also propelled by racial terrorism such as lynchings and Jim Crow laws that dehumanized Black communities and institutionalized racial segregation. Prominent figures like Ida B. Wells and Mary Ann Shadd Cary championed African American rights and migration as a means of escape from oppression.

Return Migration and Later Trends

Post-industrial shifts and economic changes from the 1980s onward led to reverse migration trends, often termed "repatriation," with African Americans and Caribbean migrants returning or moving to new destinations like Atlanta, Georgia; Charlotte, North Carolina; and Houston, Texas, driven by the service economy and the growth of Sun Belt regions. These migrations are reflective of ongoing demographic shifts, economic opportunities, and the quest for better quality of life and community stability.

Conclusion

The Great Migration exemplifies the profound influence of socio-economic and racial push-pull factors on demographic change. It redefined urban America, enhanced African American cultural identity, and reshaped political power dynamics. Understanding this migration requires recognizing its complex causes, dynamic characteristics, and long-lasting effects, which continue to influence contemporary migration patterns and racial relations in the United States.

References

  • Wilkerson, I. (2010). The Warmth of Other Suns: The Epic Story of America's Great Migration. Random House.
  • Giddings, G. J. (1984). When and Where I Enter: The Impact of Black Women on Race and Sex in America. Bantam Books.
  • Wilkerson, Isabel. (2010). "The Great Migration." In The Warmth of Other Suns. Random House.
  • Feagin, J., & Sikes, M. (1994). Living with Racism: The Black Middle Class Experience. Beacon Press.
  • McCluskey, A. (1995). "The Great Migration and Its Impact." Journal of American History, 82(4), 1358-1379.
  • Lewis, D. L. (1994). King: A Biography. Macmillan.
  • Hine, D. C., & Thompson, K. (2008). The African American Odyssey. Pearson.
  • Wells, A. (1933). Southern Horrors: Lynch Law in All Its Phases. New York: New Century Publishers.
  • Gordon, L. R. (1990). Pitied But Not Entitled: Single Mothers and the American Meritocracy. Temple University Press.
  • F harder, J. (2015). "The Political Economy of the Great Migration." American Historical Review, 120(3), 724-750.