Greendale Stadium Case: Constructing The Stadium Inst 815292

Greendale Stadium Case WBSconstructing The Stadiuminstallation Of St

Part A: Create a multi-level work breakdown structure (WBS) and detailed project schedule, using the information from the “Greendale Stadium Case” located at the end of Chapter 6, and incorporating the following constraints: The project must include at least twenty tasks, each with specified start and finish dates matching their durations, assigned resources, normal weekday work schedule, and holidays when no work takes place. Part B: Respond in a 1-2 page paper addressing project completion date, critical path, slack/float, activities impacting project completion, and additional activities to improve project management.

Paper For Above instruction

The following paper provides an analysis of the project schedule for the Greendale Stadium construction project, emphasizing the development of a comprehensive work breakdown structure (WBS) and detailed project timeline, alongside a strategic review of critical project management components. The goal is to ensure the successful completion of the project within established constraints, leveraging project management best practices.

Introduction

Constructing a stadium is a complex undertaking that requires meticulous planning, resource allocation, and schedule management. The Greendale Stadium case offers valuable insights into the systematic approach needed in project management, particularly through the creation of a comprehensive WBS and detailed project schedule. This analysis details the development of these elements, integrating project constraints such as work duration, resource assignment, and scheduling considerations, including holidays. Furthermore, it evaluates the critical path, slack, and activities with potential to impact project delivery, and suggests enhancements to ensure project success.

Development of the Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)

The WBS is a hierarchical decomposition of the project scope into manageable work packages. For the Greendale Stadium, the WBS incorporates all major phases such as site clearance, foundation and support piling, stadium infrastructure, roofing, lighting, seating, luxury boxes, and final inspection. Each of these major tasks is broken down into sub-tasks, ensuring at least 20 distinct activities as required. For example, the 'Stadium Infrastructure' encompasses constructing steel supports, installing roof tracks, and erecting steel canopy, each with assigned resources such as construction crews, specialists, and electricians.

Additionally, critical activities like pouring concrete, support piling, and installation of amenities are sequenced to respect dependencies. The WBS further allocates resources based on task requirements, assigning crews such as demolition, masonry, construction, and electrical teams accordingly. This detailed structure facilitates scheduling by clarifying scope and resource requirements at every level, leading to an organized execution plan that respects the project's constraints.

Project Schedule Development

The project schedule is developed by assigning durations: 195 days for infrastructure and steel canopy, 30 days for lighting, 170 days for seats and jumbotron, 90 days for luxury boxes, 120 days for the playing field and upper steel, and others as specified. Tasks are scheduled sequentially and in parallel where dependencies permit, ensuring the total duration aligns with identified critical activities. Normal workdays exclude weekends and specified holidays, which have been incorporated into the schedule by adjusting start and finish dates accordingly.

The schedule is crafted using project management software, such as Microsoft Project, enabling visualization of task sequences, resource allocations, and critical path analysis. The critical path includes activities such as support piling, pouring of main concourse, installation of roof tracks, and final inspection—all directly influencing project completion. Slack or float is calculated for non-critical activities, typically allowing some flexibility, with activities like seating and luxury box construction having some movement potential without delaying the overall schedule.

Analysis of Critical Path and Slack

The critical path for the Greendale Stadium project predominantly involves activities essential for maintaining the project's end date. Support pile driving, concrete pouring, steel erection, roofing, and installation of primary infrastructure are key milestones. Activities on the critical path have zero slack, meaning any delay would directly impact the project completion date. Conversely, activities such as installing seats or luxury boxes have some slack, offering managerial flexibility to reallocate resources or manage delays without affecting overall delivery.

The critical path analysis reveals that delays in foundation work or steel erection could prove most detrimental. Therefore, monitoring these tasks through rigorous quality control and resource oversight is essential to prevent schedule overruns. The slack activities, while less critical, still require careful management to ensure they do not escalate into bottlenecks due to resource contention or unforeseen issues.

Activities Impacting Project Completion

The top three activities with the greatest potential to influence the project's finish date include:

1. Driving Support Pilings: As a foundational activity, delays here would cascade into subsequent tasks like concrete pouring and steel erection.
2. Pouring the Main Concourse and Lower Concrete: These tasks are time-consuming and dependent on the successful completion of foundational work.
3. Construction of the Steel Canopy and Roof Support: Steel erection and roofing are complex and weather-sensitive, with delays potentially holding up critical subsequent activities.

Proactive management, including scheduling buffer times and contingency planning, for these activities is vital to maintaining the project timeline.

Additional Activities for Improved Project Management

To enhance the project plan from a management perspective, several additional activities could be incorporated:

• Risk Management Planning: Developing comprehensive risk mitigation strategies for weather delays, resource shortages, and technical challenges.
• Quality Assurance & Control: Implementing ongoing quality checks, especially during foundation, steel erection, and roofing phases.
• Stakeholder Engagement and Communication: Regular updates and coordination meetings to preempt misunderstandings or conflicts.
• Procurement Planning: Ensuring timely procurement of materials such as steel, seating, and lighting to prevent delays.
• Health and Safety Programs: Embedding safety protocols into each phase to prevent accidents that could halt work.

Incorporating these activities ensures a holistic approach to project management, reducing risks and enhancing efficiency.

Conclusion

In summary, developing a structured WBS and detailed project schedule, inclusive of resource assignment and schedule constraints, is essential for successfully managing the Greendale Stadium project. Critical path analysis highlights focus points that require vigilant management, while slack in non-critical tasks offers flexibility. By proactively integrating risk management, quality control, and stakeholder communication activities, project managers can better assure timely delivery and quality outcomes, ultimately fulfilling the project's scope within the stipulated timeline.

References

• Kerzner, H. (2017). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. Wiley.
• PMI. (2017). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) (6th Edition). Project Management Institute.
• Larson, E., & Gray, C. (2018). Project Management: The Managerial Process. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Meredith, J. R., & Mantel Jr, S. J. (2017). Project Management: A Strategic Approach. Wiley.
• Schwalbe, K. (2018). Information Technology Project Management. Cengage Learning.
• Heldman, K. (2018). Project Management JumpStart. Wiley.
• Gray, C., & Larson, E. (2020). Project Management: The Managerial Process (7th Edition). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Harrison, F. L., & Lock, D. (2017). Advanced Project Management: A Structured Approach. Gower Publishing.
• Turner, J. R. (2016). Gower Handbook of Project Management. Gower Publishing.
• Verzuh, E. (2015). The Fast Forward MBA in Project Management. Wiley.