Group Assignment 15 Due Week 9 Students Will Be Assigned

Group Assignment 15 Due To Week 9students Will Be Assigned One Of

Students will be assigned one of the weekly topics (chapters 1–5) in the course by the course coordinator. You should locate one academic/scholarly article related to the assigned topic. The article selected must be an academic/scholarly article. Ask your librarian or your instructor for assistance if you are unsure about the type of article you have chosen. Each group of students (2-4 students) is required to prepare a critique of an academic article.

Students should present their findings to the class. You should briefly summarize the article, identifying the main points made by the author(s), and provide a critique of the article. This critique could evaluate the validity of the arguments made in the article, relate the article to the content of the course, discuss how the article supplements or challenges the viewpoints expressed in the set text, or how it otherwise contributes to knowledge of the set topic. More information related to group assignment will be posted on the course portal (MOODLE). Students should submit their critiques in hard copy format with a cover sheet (1 copy for each group) on the day of their presentation. The critique should be a maximum of 1500 words.

Paper For Above instruction

The assignment requires students to critically engage with an academic article related to their assigned weekly topic within chapters 1 to 5 of the course. The task involves selecting a scholarly article, providing a comprehensive summary of its main points, and critically analyzing its validity, relevance, and contribution to the course content. The critique should relate the article to the broader subject matter, challenge or support the viewpoints in the main textbook, and demonstrate an understanding of the theoretical frameworks involved. The review must be well-structured, thoroughly supported by appropriate references, and adhere to academic standards of language, clarity, and referencing.

Students will work in groups of 2 to 4 members, emphasizing collaboration, critical thinking, and effective communication. The presentation component involves preparing 6 to 12 PowerPoint slides, focusing on clarity, engaging delivery, and visual support that enhances understanding. The slides should be concise, focusing on key points derived from the critique, and include visual elements like graphs or relevant images to support the oral presentation.

Evaluation criteria encompass content, including the relevance and depth of critique, linkage to course material, supporting references, and overall coherence; and presentation, including delivery, technological use, and engagement with the audience. Both written and oral components are integral, with specific emphasis on clarity, logical flow, and professional presentation standards. The final submitted critique should be approximately 1000 words, with proper formatting: Times New Roman, 12-point font, 1.5 line spacing, including citations in APA style or the specified referencing format.

In preparing the critique, students should address the following aspects of the article: its title, authors, publisher, publication year, originality and value, research purpose, methodology, research type, findings, and their own critical opinions. The analysis should connect findings to course concepts, evaluate the significance of the research, and articulate the scholarly contribution. The presentation should effectively communicate the critique, engage the audience, and facilitate meaningful discussion during the Q&A session.

References

  • Author(s). (Year). Title of the scholarly article. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), pages. DOI or URL
  • Author(s). (Year). Book or article on research methodology or related theories. Publisher/Journal Name.
  • Additional credible sources relevant to scholarly critique or course topics.
  • Government or institutional publications related to research standards — if applicable.
  • Recent journal articles supporting critique points or contextual understanding.
  • Official style guides (e.g., APA Publication Manual) for formatting citation standards.
  • Textbooks referenced for research processes or theoretical frameworks.
  • Research methodology resources detailing critical analysis techniques.
  • Academic articles on effective presentation strategies.
  • Guidelines on peer-reviewed journal credibility and research quality assessment.

Related Assignments