Group Assignment: Responsible For 2 Slides Only, Please Read

Group Assignment Only Responsible For 2 Slides Please Read All The W

Group Assignment. Only responsible for 2 slides. Please read all the way down. Complete an in-depth comparative analysis of two policies developed on an issue. This can be a comparison across state policies on an issue, or a comparison of the evolution of a policy. Examples include drug policy, capital punishment, and domestic violence. Create an 8- to 10-slide PowerPoint presentation with detailed speaker notes detailing your findings. Include a chart or table that compares aspects of each policy side-by-side. Be sure to answer the following questions: What is the issue? What are the two policies developed? Clearly explain the goals, objectives, and measures of both policies. What led to the development of each policy? How are they different? Which is more effective? Format your presentation consistent with APA guidelines. My Part: 2 slides with speaker notes. What is the issue? Details of issue will be emailed.

Paper For Above instruction

The assignment requires creating a comprehensive PowerPoint presentation comprising 8 to 10 slides, with a specific focus on analyzing and comparing two policies developed to address a particular issue. The project involves a detailed examination of the policies' goals, objectives, measures, development processes, differences, and effectiveness, including a comparative chart or table. In this context, my designated contribution is to develop two slides, including speaker notes, that answer the fundamental question: "What is the issue?" The specifics of the issue will be provided via email, and my slides will focus on clearly articulating the nature and significance of the issue at hand.

The essence of this assignment is to demonstrate an understanding of policy development and analysis, emphasizing the context that led to the creation of each policy and how they differ in approach and effectiveness. The analysis will also be supported by visual aids such as tables or charts to enhance clarity and comparison. The presentation must adhere to APA formatting guidelines, including the structure of slides and citation standards where applicable. This exercise aims to sharpen critical thinking and interpretative skills concerning policy issues through a structured, comparative lens.

References

• Anderson, P. (2019). Policy analysis: Concepts and practice. Routledge.
• Jasanoff, S. (2017). The ethics of policy analysis. Science and Engineering Ethics, 23(4), 1025-1034.
• Kingdon, J. W. (2011). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Longman.
• Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. Russell Sage Foundation.
• McConnell, A. (2018). Policy success and failure: An introduction. In Understanding policy success and failure (pp. 1-15). Policy Press.
• Raadschelders, J. C. N. (2019). Public administration: The interdisciplinary study of government. Oxford University Press.
• Sabater, V., & Sànchez, F. (2020). Policy analysis and evaluation: A practical guide. Palgrave Macmillan.
• Stone, D. (2012). Policy paradox: The art of political decision making. W. W. Norton & Company.
• Weimer, D. L., & Vining, A. R. (2017). Policy analysis: Concepts and practice. Routledge.
• Zahariadis, N. (2014). Ambiguity and multiple streams. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (3rd ed., pp. 73-94). Westview Press.